[ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 119.

notblox1

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 1282

Logo Designer ⛨ BSFL Division1

Quote

This article is 30 days old

Well Obviously.... but today I read it for the first time,
and mister Calvin Ayre posted tweet about it few days ago,
and you probably know about this 'gentelmen'.

There is only ONE Grin

He seems to be Satoshi Visioner and ExBCasHer.

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

Quote from: notblox1 on September 30, 2018, 12:34:46 PM

Dramatic Comedy continues Cheesy

news about BitmainCash or BitmainABC or the real BCH or whatever...

Bitmain ABC Fork Details: BitcoinCash (BCH) Chain Split Controversy is Real

What do You Need to Know About Bitmain ABC Fork?
One of the most interesting things about Satoshi’s white paper on Bitcoin was that it deleted third party intervention to handle money from individuals. It was simple and secure. Indeed, individuals were finally able to manage their funds with freedom without intervention.

The founder of Bitmain and Bitcoin ABC, Jihan Wu is trying to add its species to the original protocols changing and adding to those original protocols. Moreover, they are trying to limit or slow any attempt of a massive on-chain scaling limiting the block size to 32 MB.

Bitcoin’s landscape is very competitive. Miners are competing at all times and trying to have a better piece of the market. If they do not invest, they lag behind and do not remain competitive.

By limiting block sizes, developers control the means of production and give subsidies to inefficient miners that do not want to invest to compete in the market.

Greg Maxwell, for example, has already warned about a Big Block Attack in which large miners wanted to take away less invested miners. That misrepresents the importance of scaling the network.

In order to improve Bitcoin’s security in the long term, it is very important to raise the block size. Miners would be forced to invest and keep being competitive. Those who do not want or cannot keep, would be outside the market. This is necessary to improve and ensure the viability and security of Bitcoin.

Bitcoin needs to reach a network operation level similar to the one of Visa or MasterCard.

Both Bitmain and ABC are trying to introduce some changes that have not considered the impact that they will have on the ecosystem.

Using Canonical Transaction Ordering Rule (CTOR), transactions would be sorted based on their identifiers. That would change the underlying protocols, which is a problem. The second problem is that the network scaling issue is not solved in this way.

This only allows chainless apps to be more capable. Something good for developers. But there are other problems for users because they need to trust a third party or software oracle.

Additionally, CTOR does not support 0-confirmation transactions. Due to the fact that Bitcoin aimed and was designed to be used as cash, BCH shows that it tried to eliminate the possibility of 0 confirmation transactions. That erodes the ecosystem

Jihan Wu is a strong supporter of CTOR and Wormhole, a second layer technology allowing for smart contracts.

On one hand, it seems that this allows the ecosystem to grow. On the other hand, it really drives innovation backward. In the end, Bitcoin Cash would be more similar to Ethereum, a developer currency, rather than electronic cash.

It seems that Bitmain and Mr. Wu are trying to fund ABC due to the fact that the mining company is a very important proponent of the CTOR and Wormhole.

Wu was an important figure that allowed Segregated Witness (SegWit) to happen and to be implemented on the Bitcoin blockchain. This has severely affected the whole network limiting it and allowing developers to start working on the Lightning Network. Until now, the Lighting Network is not implemented and is not working as expected.

BCH should work in a better way, and shouldn’t be manipulated frivolously. Developing the system is the only way to ensure that it will survive in the long term.

Source:
https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/bitmain-abc-fork-details-bitcoin-cash-bch-chain-split-controversy-is-real/

This article is 30 days old

notblox1

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 1282

Logo Designer ⛨ BSFL Division1

Dramatic Comedy continues Cheesy

news about BitmainCash or BitmainABC or the real BCH or whatever...

Source:
https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/bitmain-abc-fork-details-bitcoin-cash-bch-chain-split-controversy-is-real/

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Nice new POS

https://news.bitcoin.com/new-pos-terminal-by-pundix-allows-nigerians-to-make-purchases-in-bitcoin

vanhalendlrband

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 252

Pigeoncoin got exploited for 230 million of their coins from the bitcoin bug and they have since patched it. Thats one of the alts i know of that the exploit was active on as well.

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

Quote from: notblox1 on September 30, 2018, 05:53:35 AM

Quote from: jbreher on September 29, 2018, 08:38:17 PM

Quote from: nutildah on September 29, 2018, 07:42:50 AM

OK again, so no public proof = no proof.

Absolutely. You have no public proof that CSW is not satoshi.

For the record: I am ambivalent on the matter. He may be; he may not. But you are falling upon the argument of the most fallacious nature. Lack of proof is not proof of the converse.

If he is THE SATOSHI... then why o why Roger the Ver keeps talking about Satoshi like some spirit super creator and btc whitepaper as his gospel ?
Even Bitmain Lord JW called him Fake Satoshi.
Case closed.

The same guy also said:

‘Fuck your mother if you want fuck’

notblox1

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 1282

Logo Designer ⛨ BSFL Division1

Quote from: jbreher on September 29, 2018, 08:38:17 PM

Quote from: nutildah on September 29, 2018, 07:42:50 AM

OK again, so no public proof = no proof.

Absolutely. You have no public proof that CSW is not satoshi.

For the record: I am ambivalent on the matter. He may be; he may not. But you are falling upon the argument of the most fallacious nature. Lack of proof is not proof of the converse.

If he is THE SATOSHI... then why o why Roger the Ver keeps talking about Satoshi like some spirit super creator and btc whitepaper as his gospel ?
Even Bitmain Lord JW called him Fake Satoshi.
Case closed.

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Gemini about to launch BCH trading

https://twitter.com/GeminiTrust/status/1045000599778013184

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: bones261 on September 29, 2018, 11:16:20 PM

LOL Since when is someone being ambivalent suggest that someone "believes" anything? It's like calling someone who is agnostic a religious zealot. Cheesy

Just because you say you are something it doesn't mean you are. Obviously he cares otherwise he wouldn't have injected himself into the discussion. Not like anybody was asking him about his opinion.

Saying I have no proof that somebody isn't some anonymous person is simply rehashing the definition of what "anonymous" is. It's a rather stupid, obvious statement for him to make.

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: nutildah on September 29, 2018, 11:11:39 PM

Quote from: jbreher on September 29, 2018, 08:38:17 PM

Quote from: nutildah on September 29, 2018, 07:42:50 AM

OK again, so no public proof = no proof.

Absolutely. You have no public proof that CSW is not satoshi.

For the record: I am ambivalent on the matter. He may be; he may not. But you are falling upon the argument of the most fallacious nature. Lack of proof is not proof of the converse.

And you have no proof that I'm not Satoshi either. Neither have you proof that my grandma is not Satoshi. This is a stupid fucking argument but if you want to continue to believe that a bull-headed narcissist, an egotistical, mean-spirited sociopath is Satoshi, despite an utter lack of evidence, that's your right as a human citizen. Have at it.

There's a raging Flat Earth argument in Off Topic that could probably use your help in its defense.

LOL Since when is someone being ambivalent suggest that someone "believes" anything? It's like calling someone who is agnostic a religious zealot. Cheesy

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: jbreher on September 29, 2018, 08:38:17 PM

Quote from: nutildah on September 29, 2018, 07:42:50 AM

OK again, so no public proof = no proof.

Absolutely. You have no public proof that CSW is not satoshi.

For the record: I am ambivalent on the matter. He may be; he may not. But you are falling upon the argument of the most fallacious nature. Lack of proof is not proof of the converse.

And you have no proof that I'm not Satoshi either. Neither have you proof that my grandma is not Satoshi. This is a stupid fucking argument but if you want to continue to believe that a bull-headed narcissist, an egotistical, mean-spirited sociopath is Satoshi, despite an utter lack of evidence, that's your right as a human citizen. Have at it.

There's a raging Flat Earth argument in Off Topic that could probably use your help in its defense.

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: nutildah on September 29, 2018, 07:42:50 AM

OK again, so no public proof = no proof.

Absolutely. You have no public proof that CSW is not satoshi.

For the record: I am ambivalent on the matter. He may be; he may not. But you are falling upon the argument of the most fallacious nature. Lack of proof is not proof of the converse.

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: nutildah on September 28, 2018, 09:24:21 PM

If Craig was Satoshi, why would he need to pull an elaborate hoax on Gavin Andresen where he presented keys that were already publicly available, embedded in the blockchain?

Careful with your assumptions there.

You have absolutely _no_idea_ what evidence CSW presented to Gavin.

Well, unless you are either Gavin or CSW -- both of which I find extremely unlikely.

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: Icutgrass205 on September 28, 2018, 03:12:30 PM

So then why do so many people in the crypto community trash CSW and call him a scammer when there is legally verified evidence that he was a part of satoshi?

The community has not been presented with legally verified evidence that he was part of satoshi.

jojo69

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 4606

diamond-handed zealot

POMP NAO!

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: boomboom on September 29, 2018, 02:49:45 AM

He deliberately made the public proof in his blog unbelievable, and his private proof to Andresen believable, all Gavin says now is he regrets getting dragged into the find satoshi game where CSW is for some reason happy to antagonise guys like you. I agree with Gavin though, in retrospect he should not have posted his supportive blog until after craig made a compelling public proof. CSW wants to be the bad guy in bitcoin, who knows why, but he does.

OK again, so no public proof = no proof.

He doesn't antagonize me, its people like you who won't let reality damage their extraordinarily unfounded outlook that antagonizes me. You're free to believe what you want, but I prefer to believe in things backed by evidence. I'm sure you also believe BCH is the real bitcoin too so what's the point in continuing this silly discussion. You're only feeding the ego of one of crypto's biggest con artists.

notblox1

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 1282

Logo Designer ⛨ BSFL Division1

I think that he is the real Faketoshi,
and BitcoinCash is the real Bcash.
There can be only one...

boomboom

hero member

Activity: 1068

Merit: 523

Quote from: Icutgrass205 on September 29, 2018, 03:54:36 AM

CSW is a savant with poor social skills..and hes Australian

Aussie guys can be quite weird , CSW is pretty normal by down under standards.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-09/in-search-of-trough-man-an-icon-of-sydneys-1980s-gay-scene/8496200

Icutgrass205

jr. member

Activity: 98

Merit: 4

Bitcoin is today what the internet was decades ago

Quote from: nutildah on September 29, 2018, 02:10:54 AM

Quote from: boomboom on September 28, 2018, 11:49:13 PM

None of us knows the proof gavin saw, all we know is it satisfiec him, and then craig chose to make his public proofs dodgy, but I suspect all will be revealed eventually.

Actually its all very, very public and very easy to understand how Craig was pulling over a fast one on poor Gavin. The debate of whether Craig is a charlatan or not has long been over with. Everybody knows he was lying. Its facetious to pretend its still up in the air.

https://www.ccn.com/gavin-andersen-craig-wright-blog-mistake/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU

Besides, never in any of his public communications was Satoshi 1/10th as big an asshole as CSW is on any given day. And unless CSW has an opposite sleep pattern from 99% of all human beings on earth their sleep cycles do not match up. The reasons why CSW is NOT Satoshi are many and varied and its fallacious of you to continue pretending any doubt remains in the matter.

CSW is a savant with poor social skills..and hes Australian

boomboom

hero member

Activity: 1068

Merit: 523

Quote from: nutildah on September 29, 2018, 02:10:54 AM

Quote from: boomboom on September 28, 2018, 11:49:13 PM

None of us knows the proof gavin saw, all we know is it satisfiec him, and then craig chose to make his public proofs dodgy, but I suspect all will be revealed eventually.

Actually its all very, very public and very easy to understand how Craig was pulling over a fast one on poor Gavin. The debate of whether Craig is a charlatan or not has long been over with. Everybody knows he was lying. Its facetious to pretend its still up in the air.

https://www.ccn.com/gavin-andersen-craig-wright-blog-mistake/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU

Besides, never in any of his public communications was Satoshi 1/10th as big an asshole as CSW is on any given day. And unless CSW has an opposite sleep pattern from 99% of all human beings on earth their sleep cycles do not match up. The reasons why CSW is NOT Satoshi are many and varied and its fallacious of you to continue pretending any doubt remains in the matter.

Andresen still thinks CSW is satoshi, and states clearly he wont discuss any of the private personal details that convinced him, as I said before CSW wants guys like you to discredit and doubt him, and you're doing what he wants. He deliberately made the public proof in his blog unbelievable, and his private proof to Andresen believable, all Gavin says now is he regrets getting dragged into the find satoshi game where CSW is for some reason happy to antagonise guys like you. I agree with Gavin though, in retrospect he should not have posted his supportive blog until after craig made a compelling public proof. CSW wants to be the bad guy in bitcoin, who knows why, but he does.

Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 119. (Read 704506 times)