Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 132. (Read 704506 times)
That the I in the last time often hear and see about how that say BCH not will grow in any time soon, and will only fall down. Who that thinks on this about?
"Statement on Bitcoin Cash Forking - Bitcoin-SV (BSV)
2018-09-01 08:50:05
Dear CoinEx users:
We’ve recently noticed that nChain (https://nchain.com/en/), an influential company in Bitcoin Cash community, published an announcement of the creation of Bitcoin SV (https://nchain.com/en/blog/bitcoin-sv-launch/):
Bitcoin-SV (BSV) is the altered version of Bitcoin Cash protocols. BSV is likely to bring a potential fork of Bitcoin Cash by causing incompatibility with Bitcoin Cash network and therefore create a new cryptocurrency asset - Bitcoin-SV (Token: BSV). Should it happen, all Bitcoin Cash holders will then receive BSV assets against a 1:1 ratio on your BCH assets.
As a responsible cryptocurrency trading platform who guarantees maximum protection for customer assets, we decide to make the following precautions for a potential fork:
1. On the basis of “snapshot” during the potential forking, we will allocate BSV to your accounts against a 1:1 ratio on your BCH assets.
2. After the fork, we will release a BSV/BCH trading pair in CoinEx so you can buy or sell BSV.
3. CoinEx will not support BSV deposit and withdrawal until its chain is stabilized and all supporting services e.g. wallet are available. Please refer to our official announcement for more information.
Potential security risks
Unlike the previous forked assets, Bitcoin-SV (SV) lacks the replay protection mechanism, which will bring chaos to the entire Bitcoin Cash network, causing unnecessary asset loss for users.
Therefore, CoinEx strongly recommends that Bitcoin-SV (SV) could take the concerns into consideration and add replay protection mechanism to avoid any unnecessary loss.
CoinEx will protect your assets
Together with ViaBTC mining pool, CoinEx will guard your assets even if there’s no replay protection.
Attention
To avoid unnecessary asset loss, CoinEx recommends all users to deposit their BCH assets to CoinEx before the potential forking. We will provide 100% protection for your assets and please be assured that you will receive the forked asset of BSV as promised.
CoinEx reserves the rights of final explanation of the announcement."
- https://www.coinex.com/announcement/detail?id=124
2018-09-01 08:50:05
Dear CoinEx users:
We’ve recently noticed that nChain (https://nchain.com/en/), an influential company in Bitcoin Cash community, published an announcement of the creation of Bitcoin SV (https://nchain.com/en/blog/bitcoin-sv-launch/):
Bitcoin-SV (BSV) is the altered version of Bitcoin Cash protocols. BSV is likely to bring a potential fork of Bitcoin Cash by causing incompatibility with Bitcoin Cash network and therefore create a new cryptocurrency asset - Bitcoin-SV (Token: BSV). Should it happen, all Bitcoin Cash holders will then receive BSV assets against a 1:1 ratio on your BCH assets.
As a responsible cryptocurrency trading platform who guarantees maximum protection for customer assets, we decide to make the following precautions for a potential fork:
1. On the basis of “snapshot” during the potential forking, we will allocate BSV to your accounts against a 1:1 ratio on your BCH assets.
2. After the fork, we will release a BSV/BCH trading pair in CoinEx so you can buy or sell BSV.
3. CoinEx will not support BSV deposit and withdrawal until its chain is stabilized and all supporting services e.g. wallet are available. Please refer to our official announcement for more information.
Potential security risks
Unlike the previous forked assets, Bitcoin-SV (SV) lacks the replay protection mechanism, which will bring chaos to the entire Bitcoin Cash network, causing unnecessary asset loss for users.
Therefore, CoinEx strongly recommends that Bitcoin-SV (SV) could take the concerns into consideration and add replay protection mechanism to avoid any unnecessary loss.
CoinEx will protect your assets
Together with ViaBTC mining pool, CoinEx will guard your assets even if there’s no replay protection.
Attention
To avoid unnecessary asset loss, CoinEx recommends all users to deposit their BCH assets to CoinEx before the potential forking. We will provide 100% protection for your assets and please be assured that you will receive the forked asset of BSV as promised.
CoinEx reserves the rights of final explanation of the announcement."
- https://www.coinex.com/announcement/detail?id=124
Time shows that the coin has a good future and great prospects for rapid growth in 2019 
story time lols...DONT SUE ME PLEASE LOLS 
2015...
Me- i want to control Bitcoin...but how?...
friend- well og btc will fork sometime for segwet/ln..why not take the old chain?
me ...hmmm but why would people want to use Mr P's chain over the blockstream chain?
friend - well, og chain is satoshi's chain, without blockstream, so why not just say your satoshi lols.
me- wait a minute....damn,,,, i just realised something...I AM SATOSHI.
friend- yea, now go tell the world,lols.
2016..
me- right bbc , im going to tell you all something, bring the cameras.....
I am satoshi.
bbc- prove it...
me- ok tomorrow....(i aint showing shit lols)
friend- well done you now caught the worlds attention, now we wait for the fork.
2017..after fork..
me- damn to many people on BCH chain, stopping me from taking over ....
freind- just keep saying your satoshi, we will fork off again and then thats it...
me- wow, your right fork again from BCH and since some peeps think im satoshi they will buy and follow my vision,
im gonna call new fork...BCH MPV (Mr P's vision)
2015...
Me- i want to control Bitcoin...but how?...
friend- well og btc will fork sometime for segwet/ln..why not take the old chain?
me ...hmmm but why would people want to use Mr P's chain over the blockstream chain?
friend - well, og chain is satoshi's chain, without blockstream, so why not just say your satoshi lols.
me- wait a minute....damn,,,, i just realised something...I AM SATOSHI.
friend- yea, now go tell the world,lols.
2016..
me- right bbc , im going to tell you all something, bring the cameras.....
I am satoshi.
bbc- prove it...
me- ok tomorrow....(i aint showing shit lols)
friend- well done you now caught the worlds attention, now we wait for the fork.
2017..after fork..
me- damn to many people on BCH chain, stopping me from taking over ....
freind- just keep saying your satoshi, we will fork off again and then thats it...
me- wow, your right fork again from BCH and since some peeps think im satoshi they will buy and follow my vision,
im gonna call new fork...BCH MPV (Mr P's vision)
True story. Lol.
story time lols...DONT SUE ME PLEASE LOLS
2015...
Me- i want to control Bitcoin...but how?...
friend- well og btc will fork sometime for segwet/ln..why not take the old chain?
me ...hmmm but why would people want to use Mr P's chain over the blockstream chain?
friend - well, og chain is satoshi's chain, without blockstream, so why not just say your satoshi lols.
me- wait a minute....damn,,,, i just realised something...I AM SATOSHI.
friend- yea, now go tell the world,lols.
2016..
me- right bbc , im going to tell you all something, bring the cameras.....
I am satoshi.
bbc- prove it...
me- ok tomorrow....(i aint showing shit lols)
friend- well done you now caught the worlds attention, now we wait for the fork.
2017..after fork..
me- damn to many people on BCH chain, stopping me from taking over ....
freind- just keep saying your satoshi, we will fork off again and then thats it...
me- wow, your right fork again from BCH and since some peeps think im satoshi they will buy and follow my vision,
im gonna call new fork...BCH MPV (Mr P's vision)
2015...
Me- i want to control Bitcoin...but how?...
friend- well og btc will fork sometime for segwet/ln..why not take the old chain?
me ...hmmm but why would people want to use Mr P's chain over the blockstream chain?
friend - well, og chain is satoshi's chain, without blockstream, so why not just say your satoshi lols.
me- wait a minute....damn,,,, i just realised something...I AM SATOSHI.
friend- yea, now go tell the world,lols.
2016..
me- right bbc , im going to tell you all something, bring the cameras.....
I am satoshi.
bbc- prove it...
me- ok tomorrow....(i aint showing shit lols)
friend- well done you now caught the worlds attention, now we wait for the fork.
2017..after fork..
me- damn to many people on BCH chain, stopping me from taking over ....
freind- just keep saying your satoshi, we will fork off again and then thats it...
me- wow, your right fork again from BCH and since some peeps think im satoshi they will buy and follow my vision,
im gonna call new fork...BCH MPV (Mr P's vision)
Dr Craig S Wright
Verified account
@ProfFaustus
Follow Follow @ProfFaustus
More
I shall provide sufficent evidence to enable a criminal fraud prosecution against "Scronty".
This material shall be compiled and released in Sept. It shall include his extortion attempt and far more.
Sorry. He has nothing to do with Bitcoin, and his fall will be an example.
2:12 pm - 31 Aug 2018
Dr Jones...if your going to enable a criminal fraud prosecution against "Scronty".....
then why are you announcing it to the world before doing it?
Scronty , just like all of us has alot to do with Bitcoin...
Verified account
@ProfFaustus
Follow Follow @ProfFaustus
More
I shall provide sufficent evidence to enable a criminal fraud prosecution against "Scronty".
This material shall be compiled and released in Sept. It shall include his extortion attempt and far more.
Sorry. He has nothing to do with Bitcoin, and his fall will be an example.
2:12 pm - 31 Aug 2018
Dr Jones...if your going to enable a criminal fraud prosecution against "Scronty".....
then why are you announcing it to the world before doing it?
Scronty , just like all of us has alot to do with Bitcoin...
I guess my point of confusion was unclear. Allow me to be very specific: What do you mean by "put Bitcoin Cash in the save zone"?
You have several points of confusion. But lets clear this one up: Obviously he meant "safe zone."
How do you expect anybody to take you seriously if you actually believe Bitcoin Craig is Satoshi?
Now I know why you don't like Theymos. He has the things you crave the most, yet are sorely lacking: control and influence.
ok, try to convince you with the next consideration:
Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.
CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.
conclusion: different persons with different personalities
Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.
CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.
conclusion: different persons with different personalities
I don't have a dog in this hunt. I'm not even sure the outcome means anything.
I must admit some puzzlement, however, as to what you mean by "put Bitcoin Cash in the save zone". Care to elucidate?
The "outcome"? There is no outcome yet to be determined. Bitcoin Craig failed to provide actual proof he was Satoshi, then wormed his way out of his claim by issuing a half-apology. What he definitely is, however, is one of the biggest egomaniacs bitcoin has ever seen. Now he's hellbent on breaking Bitcoin Cash apparently. If he actually cared about anything other than himself, he would simply shut up for a bit. There's your elucidation.
I really don't give a damn about your opinion of CSW.
I guess my point of confusion was unclear. Allow me to be very specific: What do you mean by "put Bitcoin Cash in the save zone"?
ok, try to convince you with the next consideration:
Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.
CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.
conclusion: different persons with different personalities
Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.
CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.
conclusion: different persons with different personalities
I don't have a dog in this hunt. I'm not even sure the outcome means anything.
I must admit some puzzlement, however, as to what you mean by "put Bitcoin Cash in the save zone". Care to elucidate?
The "outcome"? There is no outcome yet to be determined. Bitcoin Craig failed to provide actual proof he was Satoshi, then wormed his way out of his claim by issuing a half-apology. What he definitely is, however, is one of the biggest egomaniacs bitcoin has ever seen. Now he's hellbent on breaking Bitcoin Cash apparently. If he actually cared about anything other than himself, he would simply shut up for a bit. There's your elucidation.
ok, try to convince you with the next consideration:
Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.
CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.
conclusion: different persons with different personalities
Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.
CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.
conclusion: different persons with different personalities
I don't have a dog in this hunt. I'm not even sure the outcome means anything.
I must admit some puzzlement, however, as to what you mean by "put Bitcoin Cash in the save zone". Care to elucidate?
Also, Theymos locked the satoshi account. Theymos would need undeniable proof to allow anyone to sign in. This is good, since Bitcointalk was hacked back in 2015, and I believe the e-mails and passwords were compromised along with much more personal data.
I don't really see how having an anointed gatekeeper for thought leadership on who may or may not be satoshi is goodness. Be it Theymos or anyone else.
ok, try to convince you with the next consideration:
Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.
CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.
conclusion: different persons with different personalities
OR
PS. "Most probably" is most probably the best that you are going to do with me. For me, most probably, is an even higher level of convinced than "beyond a reasonable doubt."
What kinda coin is this?
I see you are new here. In answering your question, the best place to start is with: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
ATM, I guess. The future? Perhaps not.
I swapped my bch for bitcoin at .2 so I want BTC to succeed lol
No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so.
He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date.
I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum.
I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ...
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.188
I agree that it would be best for him. However, it would then put him in an exalted position, like Vitalik Buterin. I really don't think BCH or BTC needs that. I prefer not knowing exactly who satoshi was. Also, if proof is ever provided, I hope it doesn't come in the form of a rage quit and dumping on our heads.
He is NOT Satoshi.
Quote from: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9bw2rf/if_craig_wright_is_satoshi_why_did_he_disappear/
If Craig Wright is Satoshi why did he disappear to come back?
Its totally illogical. First he gives up the project and repository and then he comes back and wants to start a hash war?
Its totally illogical. First he gives up the project and repository and then he comes back and wants to start a hash war?
I must concur that I actually believe he is most probably not Satoshi. However, the above quote from reddit does not really prove that he is not Satoshi by contradiction. Human beings are not necessarily beings who are consistent in their behavior their entire life. It's not uncommon to hear someone say in the news, "that was so unlike him."
ok, try to convince you with the next consideration:
Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.
CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.
conclusion: different persons with different personalities
No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so.
He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date.
I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum.
I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ...
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.188
I agree that it would be best for him. However, it would then put him in an exalted position, like Vitalik Buterin. I really don't think BCH or BTC needs that. I prefer not knowing exactly who satoshi was. Also, if proof is ever provided, I hope it doesn't come in the form of a rage quit and dumping on our heads.
He is NOT Satoshi.
Quote from: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9bw2rf/if_craig_wright_is_satoshi_why_did_he_disappear/
If Craig Wright is Satoshi why did he disappear to come back?
Its totally illogical. First he gives up the project and repository and then he comes back and wants to start a hash war?
Its totally illogical. First he gives up the project and repository and then he comes back and wants to start a hash war?
I must concur that I actually believe he is most probably not Satoshi. However, the above quote from reddit does not really prove that he is not Satoshi by contradiction. Human beings are not necessarily beings who are consistent in their behavior their entire life. It's not uncommon to hear someone say in the news, "that was so unlike him."
I don't imagine the real Satoshi would 'rage quit' in this regard. With a high probability the main drivers of Bitcoin (BTC) are now unfortunately no longer with us (deceased). 
Read the thoughts of some cypherpunks, these are the peers that Satoshi originally announced Bitcoin to.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypherpunk
- https://moxie.org/stories/money-machine/ <<<< really good read this one!
Peace.
Read the thoughts of some cypherpunks, these are the peers that Satoshi originally announced Bitcoin to.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypherpunk
- https://moxie.org/stories/money-machine/ <<<< really good read this one!
Peace.
he is still alive. LL@Microsoft
Therefore the first software was developed in Windows.
No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so.
He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date.
I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum.
I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ...
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.188
I agree that it would be best for him. However, it would then put him in an exalted position, like Vitalik Buterin. I really don't think BCH or BTC needs that. I prefer not knowing exactly who satoshi was. Also, if proof is ever provided, I hope it doesn't come in the form of a rage quit and dumping on our heads.
Good. Realize that he has already put himself into this exalted position (Satoshi or not), by actually claiming to be Satoshi.
I to believe that Satoshi group is/was best preserved by myth and legend alone. This was Mythopoeia.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythopoeia
I don't imagine the real Satoshi would 'rage quit' in this regard. With a high probability the main drivers of original Bitcoin (BTC) are now unfortunately no longer with us (deceased).
Read the thoughts of some cypherpunks, these are the peers that Satoshi originally announced Bitcoin to.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypherpunk
- https://moxie.org/stories/money-machine/ <<<< really good read this one!
Peace.
No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so.
He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date.
I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum.
I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ...
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.188
I agree that it would be best for him. However, it would then put him in an exalted position, like Vitalik Buterin. I really don't think BCH or BTC needs that. I prefer not knowing exactly who satoshi was. Also, if proof is ever provided, I hope it doesn't come in the form of a rage quit and dumping on our heads.
He is NOT Satoshi.
Quote from: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9bw2rf/if_craig_wright_is_satoshi_why_did_he_disappear/
If Craig Wright is Satoshi why did he disappear to come back?
Its totally illogical. First he gives up the project and repository and then he comes back and wants to start a hash war?
Its totally illogical. First he gives up the project and repository and then he comes back and wants to start a hash war?
No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so.
He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date.
I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum.
I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ...
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.188
I agree that it would be best for him. However, it would then put him in an exalted position, like Vitalik Buterin. I really don't think BCH or BTC needs that. I prefer not knowing exactly who satoshi was. Also, if proof is ever provided, I hope it doesn't come in the form of a rage quit and dumping on our heads.
https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/status/1035322235983159296?s=21
In all fairness, anyone with a background in common law will understand that no one wants to be take ownership of being Satoshi Nakamoto.
In all fairness, anyone with a background in common law will understand that no one wants to be take ownership of being Satoshi Nakamoto.
Indeed.
However, one cannot simply continue to pretend to be someone or something, especially when that very thing allows you to prove otherwise.
This is about cryptography. Financial cryptography at that. Sign and Verify.
I decided I should do this myself recently, it was really hard for me to do, not in practice (that's the really easy bit), but emotionally difficult.
Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/verifying-my-old-zero-balance-wallet-address-for-blockchain-research-etc-4630066
Ask yourselves - Why can't CSW login to this forum as Satoshi Nakamoto or just simply sign and verify somewhere? If a three letter agency has his keys or he requires a multi-party signing to do this then he needs to explain this. This is not a joke.
Like me, Craig was clearly around during Bitcoin's inception (even earlier on than myself and many others on this forum) - However, I have no knowledge of him mining. I do know that Dave Kleiman was mining.
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42180805
If he is Satoshi, it would be best for BTC and BCH that he not verify. That would give him undue influence on how things turn out. Bitcoin is supposed to be based on Nakamoto consensus, which is basically proof of work. Nakamoto consensus should not be proof of who is Satoshi Nakamoto.
Also, Theymos locked the satoshi account. Theymos would need undeniable proof to allow anyone to sign in. This is good, since Bitcointalk was hacked back in 2015, and I believe the e-mails and passwords were compromised along with much more personal data.
No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so.
He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date.
I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum.
I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ...
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.188
Jump to: