Reddit /r/Bitcoin is in high gear trying to censor the article and is coercing the writer to change that paragraph to something that conforms with their Comintern Information Bureau, as expected.
It's the only place in the world that people work 24/7 to rewrite history to conform to their alternate reality, rather than just accepting the cold hard facts: They broke Bitcoin, so it moved on without them. I don't care what you call it, BCH baby.
LOL at BlueMatt sucking up to the SEC, what a penis.
Finally, yes, the day of reckoning for Tether is here. I predict they will print a few more runs of $200 million before it dies in a fire.
From: [email protected]
Thank you for your comments. You, along with many others, expressed concern on section 8.1.2. To help foster a full transparency approach on the editing of this section, I am sending the revised section to you for further comment.
8.1.2 Bitcoin Cash (BCH or BCC1) In 2017, Bitcoin users adopted an improvement proposal for Segregated Witness (known as SegWit, where transactions are split into two segments: transactional data, and signature data) through a soft fork. SegWit made it possible to store transactional data in a more efficient form. However, a group of users had different opinions on how Bitcoin should evolve – and developed a hard fork of the Bitcoin blockchain titled Bitcoin Cash. Rather than implementing the SegWit changes, the developers of Bitcoin Cash decided to increase the maximum blocksize (additionally the developers made changes to other aspects of the system, such as the difficulty adjustment algorithm). When the hard fork occurred, people had access to the same amount of coins on Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.
1The ticker used for Bitcoin Cash differs depending on the exchange; some use BCH, some BCC
