Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 49. (Read 704506 times)

Is the war has been over between ABC and SV? I converted my coins into ABC which looking more strong and now from last few days ABC is still head and in more strong position which is so relaxed for me.

You need to rethink your assumptions. Bitcoin Cash -- neither ABC nor SV -- want anything to do with LN. However, if they did, it would be a simple matter to add support for 'Lightning Cash Network'. But what would be the point? What with LN currently unable to transact in anything more meaningful than a bumper sticker.


Support? You really do have a simplistic view of the world, don't you? Turns out Roger's offer of $1.25M USD (or whatever the sum) was insufficient for OpenNode to totally scrap their business plan, and revector entirely to a different infrastructure layer. Oh well.


Especially funny given your username. Bitcoin Cash is not the market cap leader at the moment. But it certainly is not 'next to 0'. You know what it's next to? At #4, it is next to #3 -- XRP -- which really isn't even a cryptocurrency in the true definition of the word. So it's kind of next to #2 Ethereum - which having an unbounded supply, also fails the 'money' test. Which kind of makes it #2, which would be kind of next to Bitcoin Segwit.

You know what Bitcoin Cash is not 'next to'? Bitcoin Cash is not 'next to' Bitcoin Diamond, which seems destined to always be a fourth-rate also-ran.


I would like to see evidence of that assertion. That is, if you're not just pulling shit out of your ass and throwing it. Just stop. It's unsanitary, and it just stinks up the place. Of course, that's obviously your intent.

Ask yourself, why is name calling needed at all here? What does this proof?

Go and find out yourselve what tech is working and due to Bitcoin's honest purpose..

It is difficult to be accepted but this is the reality, and we learn for each coin for the investment we will choose. BCH is learning to be the best but still needs a process for that development. Let healthy competition always exist and this will be an interesting one to consider.

BCash is having some extreme issues this sort of asset can fall to really new lowest because it cannot get any support from lightning network.
Roger Ver has been rejected for the support from the opennode
this asset is next to 0
dont put your valuable money into junk which you are unaware of .. its your hard earned money i suppose and if you gonna put something in modified source which is not scalable and have issues with coding you are making a big mistake in your life... roger ver and people like craig wright will bring you random coins for their own motives they know themselves what they are bringing to market.. roger ver has even sold most of the BCash these people are curse to crypto community dont be blind into thinking this asset will be any good..
i am just here to help our community i have no other motive then to serve people.
i would suggest anyone to get a new algo coin which are mainly under top 3

please dont burn your money and then get crazy over things that didnt work well.

takecare of your investments and rethink in 2019 this might be just be over for bearmarket and we would jump into bull market soon but not all coins will perform the same.

What matters the most is trust what plays vital role in ultimate authority and status of anything. Bitcoin is name of trust for being up and resilient to every single attack in a decade time. There can more advanced projects but they can never reach not even near of that status and trust what Bitcoin holds. This is the main thing those understand it will never believe in words of people those can't be trusted.

Silly. If a miner is slow to propagate his block, he stands a higher chance of having that block orphaned. This is true. But this is true regardless of the block size.

Which, of course, is why miners -- who tend to have relatively large investments in mining hardware (e.g. multiple millions of USD) -- tend not to skimp on the mechanisms employed to get their blocks propagated with All Due Alacrity.

If not, then too bad, so sad. They get outcompeted. Waah.


Intentionally crippling the greatest tool for liberty mankind has known in the last century, just to satisfy some Raspberry Pi fetish, is lunacy. Not to mention counterproductive. As the cost of on-chain transactions is fated to again reach stratospheric levels.

Bribecash? Really? there is no such coin. You guys getting creative 

Guy get's too emotional I guess. Roger has shit load of btc, bch and sv. But as you know sv leaders craig, calvin keeps him out of that coin.

if will add masternodes and reward for them, there will be many who want to install a full node

The reason why people don't always want bigger blocks is due to centralization risk.

Basically assume BSV has an 128MB block thats completely filled up. If a miner finds a block but he has a slow internet connection and takes him a few seconds longer to upload his block data while at the same time another miner with a faster internet connections finds it a few seconds later but gets it sent to the nodes first, his block will get accepted instead.

Another issue is that size needed to run a node. Look at ETH, I am pretty sure its almost at 1TB and because of this reason many people don't want to run a node. Since more bandwidth and more hard drive space cost more money.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wall-observer-btcusd-bitcoin-price-movement-tracking-discussion-178336

This is totally nonsense to make confuse the people with this bigger block size now that has been over with the fork. BCH ABC and SV both are fall under altcoins so this is not your problem how BTC will overcome on these issue which is not important at this point.

https://twitter.com/ari_cryptonized/status/1080454843658055681?s=21

Honest miner did apply to Nakamoto consensus  ABC did not. But cheated and grabbed the ticker.

Hm.. sounds like blockstream did before?

Bitcoin will not be able to increase the size of the block otherwise it will mean the recognition that BCH is better. But without increasing the block to solve the problem of BTC scaling is impossible

But it was nice bribe money from Roger Kver...
He showed that he is willing to spend millions of dollars for BribeCash coin.
He is also using his dollars to pay japan sockpuppets promotions

Yes, the indicator "Baseline" also shows that the equilibrium price is 0.1

I am thinking that a fair value of BCH (BAB / BSV combined) is somewhere around the 0.10 ratio compared to BTC.
Sure we might see some spikes up like we did a few times last year however I am pretty sure it will settle eventually somewhere around the 10% ratio compared to a Bitcoin.

Right now, the ratio is very very low and I hope that we hit a bottom of it last month. Basically same with the ETH ratio, its about time they rally against the BTC.

Is that false what I've said? Anyway check this out cool thing coming to BCH don't confuse with sv.
https://www.cashaccount.info/

if we break through the line, then further growth