I'm curious, does even the hardcore proponents of BCH are still holding this coin and believe something will come out of it after all this mess?
Yep.
The people using digital cash daily in 10 years will know and care about the 2017 fork and 2018 hash war as much as iPhone users know and care about what Jobs and Woz were arguing about in 1982 , most will learn the bitcoin history from a future CSW Netflix bio mini series, i kid you not.
I threw up in my mouth a little bit when I read this statement. CSW has already been proven to be a egotistical, self serving liar, years ago actually. He's a deranged nutter and his fork of a fork gets a little closer to irrelevance with each passing day. If he's ever in a Netflix show it will be called "Bitcoin's Biggest Frauds."
What a dumb cunt.
What you just said is pure hatred without any backbone in your argument and is actually less meaningful than that ridiculous email.
yep...if BTC is gonna die and go 'tulips' it will be because he really 'was' part of the satoshi group with dave and hal and really does have access
OK fine, but BTC isn't dying. There's absolutely no proof anywhere that Craig has access to those coins. He's a deep-seeded sociopath that is incapable of being honest about anything.
What you just said is pure hatred without any backbone in your argument and is actually less meaningful than that ridiculous email.
OK let's objectively break down why CSW is a dumb cunt.
1. He's dumb because he thought sheer hash power would be enough to ram SV down everybody's throats, devoid of a community, industry support or even a real plan of action. He couldn't have been any more wrong about that if he tried.
2. He's a cunt because let's face it: he's a cunt. There is a preponderance of evidence to support this statement and its pretty much common knowledge.
Let's analyze how correct he was about the statements he made in his email to Roger Ver:
"I will do 2 years of no trade. Nothing" =
FALSE"In the war, no coin can trade." =
FALSE"If you want ABC, if you want shitcoins, welcome to bankruptcy." =
FALSE"It was nice knowing you." = I highly doubt it
"Side with ABC, you hate bitcoin, you are my enemy. You have fucking no idea what that means." = I imagine its a bit like being clawed at by a ferocious, rabid weasel
"I AM Satoshi" =
FALSE"You Could have had proof" =
FALSEThere are so many ways which Craig could prove himself to be Satoshi to the public, yet he refuses to do so. Why? Because he's not Satoshi.