Topic: [ANN] BitcoinSpinner - page 5. (Read 45071 times)

It seems that the 'unexpected error' was caused because apparently the transmission fee is no longer a fixed 0.0005 but is instead calculated, and I didn't have enough in my wallet for the amount I wanted to send + the calculated TX fee. The send worked after I tried smaller values, but the TX fee was 0.01 (although, if the TX fee causes a faster transaction I guess I can't complain... would like to be able to customize it though.

I'm getting 'an unexpected error occurred' right after it says 'please wait while the network fee is being calculated' when I try to send bitcoins at the moment. Not sure why this is.

Additionally, there have been several times when I've sent or received bitcoins to a bitcoinspinner recipient of vice-versa and it's taken a half hour before it shows that the coins are on their way.

The first issue is obviously higher priority, but any feedback on either would be appreciated.

Thanks,

-bgc

Great, thanks. I am happy the way it is now, I was just confused with the description talking about "keys" in plural, and wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything.

Yes, also that.

The backup QR code contains a random 256-bit seed, not a private key. From that random seed the bitcoin 2 private keys are deterministically generated. The first key is your login key, the second one is your bitcoin private key. Gory details here: http://code.google.com/p/bccapi/source/browse/trunk/src/com/bccapi/api/BitcoinClientAPI.java
If you use a bitcoin private key as the seed it will just be treated as a 256-bit random seed from which there will be generated keys which ties up to the next question:

The BCCAPI, which BitcoinSpinner is built on top of, allows you to manage a number of Bitcoin addresses. However, the main drivers for BitcoinSpinner are security and simplicity. And managing just one Bitcoin address/private key does make the UI much simpler to use. Now, as noted above there are two private keys in play, but the other one is used for login purposes.

This being said, there is a trick you can do to manage more than one address.
1. Install BS, which automatically generates a new random account and bitcoin private key
2. Make a backup, and print it on paper
3. Uninstall BS
4. Install BS, which automatically generates a new random account and bitcoin private key
5. Make a second backup, and print it on paper.

Now you have two different wallets, and you can switch between them by restoring from your two paper backups. Whenever you do a restore the previous keys are wiped from your device, making this a very useful feature for cold storage. I do this myself for the bulk of my coins.

Yes, this could (should) be built more seamlessly into the app.

Not really, the client only uses one key at the moment but is more than capable of handling more.  The one key rule has more to do with conserving bitcoin spinner's server resources.

I've been using spinner happily for a month. One detail bugs me: descriptions on Google Play and the wiki repeatedly refer to "private keys" in plural. And yet, from what I see there is only one private key involved, and its corresponding address. The only way to obtain a new key is to erase app data folder, so the new key pair is generated on the next start.

Am I missing something here?

Fyi...

I took a peak at a back up qr..

I formatted my own personal key into the QR code..

restored the wallet..


It made a wallet, but does not have the money I had sent into it..  therefore it must be a new/diff wallet..

I grabbed a key from Vanitygen..   of course.. this is a vanity address and priv key I want to import..


I have no idea what "type" of priv key vanity spits out..


Im actually suprised it did anything let alone make a wallet that is not the intended one I want to use, mind you I never tested its functionality, I would just assume it works..   but.. not how I wanted it to...

Any tips ? 

To do this the BitcoinSpinner server back-end has to be able to determine the unspent outputs of the private key in real-time. Today it can't.
This would be an awesome feature, and my plans are actually to do something that is even more interesting. However I am sorry that I cannot reveal more details on this for the next month or two.

Will there ever be a way to redeem a private key (e.g., scan a QR and redeem?)



Because Bitcoin Spinner uses deterministic keys, it couldn't store the private keys that are scanned.  But what it could do is create the transaction that spends the private key scanned to a new bitcoin address in the Bitcoin Spinner wallet.

This will allow Bitcoin Spinner to remain the only Bitcoin app I need on my mobile.

As much as I believe he deserves some acknowledgement for this cool app I'm pretty sure all that did great stuff like this will get their fair share when the big players search for people to get them started in bitcoin.

Rolling my own spinner is high on my todo list and probably I would put it to the market under my account for my friends that might trust me more than some guy they don't know/takes money with every transaction.

I have a cool non-bitcoin app, too and really would love to make it open source but to be honest I don't see how to make money with it. One approach I was thinking about was to make the core app open source and the shiny frontend only wraps this. I would have to provide a non-shiny front-end to provide a full app others would consider worth working with, so my base framework would be there to establish a standard within this area and my nice front-end would stand out and be worth paying for.

Similarly would I not be mad if further development on the spinner-UI would be non-open-source and only available for a fee but I would find it sad if bug-fixes to the core functionality would not find its way into a lib-spinner.

Depends on the amount.

If the mandatory 0.0005 BTC fee was increased to 0.001 BTC, with half going to donations and half as a transaction fee, I doubt anyone would even notice. For that matter, I'd recommend at least a 0.0015 BTC fee, with 0.001 BTC being for donations. With current BTC prices of ~$10, that's less than 2 cents total per transaction. Extremely reasonable.

But anything more than 0.005 BTC total, it might limit my use. Anything more than 0.01 BTC would have me reconsider using BitcoinSpinner.

Thanks for the reply. What about increasing the fee a tad and make some of it go towards your reward ?

There could still be the option for the cheapskates to compile it themselves and remove that extra fee.

Not sure how the user base would respond to that. Your time and resources ain't free, so..

Thanks!

What did you do to get the 'illegal operation'? Many android devices allow you to send an error report if this happens. If you do I get a stack-dump that tells me exactly where it happened, which is very useful for debugging.

This must be when sending coins? I have added some trimming to avoid this. This will be included in the next release.


Bitcoin addresses are not very handy, and easy to get wrong. I think that this is why more and more Bitcoin sites allow you to just scan a QR code, which is by far the easiest way to get the address into your device.
There are two very easy ways of adding addresses to your address book with BitcoinSpinner:
1. Scan a QR code containing a Bitcoin address - More and more web-sites display QR codes, and if you have an address as a string you can for instance paste it in the Search field on Blockchain.info and it will display the QR code for you.
2. Add an address from 'recent receivers' - If you have sent some coins to an address this feature allows you to select the transaction and add the receivers address to your address book.

Other wallets ask you whether you would like to add the receiver to your address book whenever you do a transaction. This really annoys me as most of the time I don't want to do this as I send to one-time addresses, like when doing a purchase. This is why I made option 2 above instead.


Great, and thanks.
BTW, there is a 'Donate' option you can access if you click the option button on your phone on the main screen of BitcoinSpinner. It hasn't been tested much 

Version 0.7.1b is out. Find it on Google Play or on the BitcoinSpinner project page for Kindle and other devices that do not use Google Play.

The only change from 0.7.0b to 0.7.1b is a private key export bug fix:
It turns out that BitcoinSpinner had a bug where the exported private key some times (more often that not) is formatted for testnet instead of prodnet.
More details here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1078070

Just installed bitcoin spinner after doing some research as to which android wallet to chose. So far I'm rather impressed.

I got some 'illegal operation' message, and I didn't understand why. So I tried to quit the app, but didn't see an exit option ? Not even when clicking menu, so I rebooted the phone, and when I started bitcoin spinner again, the same error was present.

Then I checked the bitcoin address, and it seems I had pasted an extra space at the end. Perhaps it would be a good idea to trim spaces automatically ? I copied mine from an sms message, and the extra space seemed to be added automatically.

Also, perhaps there would be some very easy method of adding addresses ? As it is noe, I first typed in an a entire bitcoin address for hans, which is fine because I'm a computer geek, but would still like to have it easier, so what about some feature where you can insert an address to the bitcoin spinner website, get a short code (4 alphanumeric) in return, and you could then import this on the phone by entering that code (app would connect to server and get the address). Or there could be a registration system that could sync bitcoin addresses betwen an online wallet and the bitcoin spinner.

I like the transaction history, and overall I think the app is well made. Great that you keep the infrastructure ready for this. Perhaps it would be possible to offer premium editions with some of the features I listed above ? Will throw some coin your way if this works as good over some time as it is working currently. Impressed. I also saw the ratings on Google Play (what an odd name!), and almost all were very positive, so this was absolutely some great work!

The key format used by BitcoinSpinner when you go to Settings -> Advanced -> Export private key is the Sipa format. As far as I remember Blockchain.info used to support this format, but it seems not to support it anymore. I have PM'ed Puik on this, and asked whether he will support it.

When it comes to crypto stuff there are no dumb questions.

The technique you refer to is often called key stretching, and I would not use it in this scenario.
1. Android processor speed is varying a lot from device to device. What takes 5 seconds on one device takes 30 seconds on another and 1 second on a third. Personally I would be annoyed if I had to wait 30 seconds to send a small transaction.
2. What takes 5 seconds on some Android my desktop computer could do in a fraction of a second. Making brute force attacks very plausible.

In the end doing this would give an annoying user experience and a false sense of security (some would call it kindergarten cryptography).

Crypto-nerds?.

Personally I think that the program should be left this way, or just with encryption that protects you for like 3 days bruteforcing with several GPUs. (I think) You shouldn't break the balance between practicality and security, specially if it's a mobile system that nobody should use with 10k USD. Weak encryption is practical(using thousands of PBKDF2 rounds), specially if someone steals your device, you can get to your home and sweep your addresses easily.

Which is what?