You are affecting this project big time, which just caused a loss of 30% hashing power... and it's just starting!
Miners realise their wallets are in endless loopholes and don't get synced ... not even the seed nodes!
What are you gonna cash out if there's no coin to cash out? Stop the greediness
Topic: [ANN] BITTUBE | NOW LIVE | NO PREMINE | NO ICO | FIRST AIRTIME MEDIA PLAYER - page 84. (Read 79844 times)
February 01, 2018, 07:25:25 PM
February 01, 2018, 06:53:56 PM
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again...
To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct...
Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500...
This is not fair.
In the grand scheme of things, for a coin with an ultimate total supply of 1 Billion, the initial error is virtually negligible. Far more damage would be done to the reputation of the project by negating the work of those who saw the potential right from the start IMHO. Who would mine it if they knew that, should a bug be discovered in future and enough people complained about it not being fair, their mining time and wallets would be wiped out on a whim? And not just those who benefited from the bug either, but everyone.
Here, among the endless stream of worthless ICOs and copy/paste crap that makes up 99.9% of the Ann forum, is a project that at launch had a working product, a good whitepaper (albeit with some glaring typos), a decent website, wallets and pools ready to go, no ICO, no pre-mine, and a clear vision to be something other than a "me too" coin. You really want to risk all of that because a few people got lucky for a few hours?
Lucky for a few hours? Can you please consider browsing the blockchain explorer... just for the fun of it?
Early adopters did get lucky for a few hours. Yes, it's annoying if you weren't mining during the bug but wiping the slate clean is going to stop anyone from being involved in this project in the future. It signals that the devs will wipe the chain which is fundamentally going to kill any blockchain based technology brand. The best case scenario you could then hope for is a hard fork, however after 24 hours would basically be suicide for any new coin.
I get that it stings right now, but a bug being live for less than 24 hours is negligible in the long run.
February 01, 2018, 06:50:29 PM
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again...
To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct...
Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500...
This is not fair.
In the grand scheme of things, for a coin with an ultimate total supply of 1 Billion, the initial error is virtually negligible. Far more damage would be done to the reputation of the project by negating the work of those who saw the potential right from the start IMHO. Who would mine it if they knew that, should a bug be discovered in future and enough people complained about it not being fair, their mining time and wallets would be wiped out on a whim?
Here, among the endless stream of worthless ICOs and copy/paste crap that makes up 99.9% of the Ann forum, is a project that at launch had a working product, a good whitepaper (albeit with some glaring typos), a decent website, wallets and pools ready to go, no ICO, no pre-mine, and a clear vision to be something other than a "me too" coin. You really want to risk all of that because a few people got lucky for a few hours?
You make a valid point.
Then Dev should continue mining with Rewards set to 10000 till another 10k or 20k blocks instead of suddenly reducing it to 500.
That would give a chance to everyone to get 10k rewards.
I agree with Speedie, starting the chain over is much worse PR than just fixing a bug and moving on. An error like this can't just wait until thousands more blocks are mined in the name of "fairness", it will mess up the entire emission plan. I think a lot of people are complaining because they missed out on the higher rewards and now want everything to start over. I consider it an "early adopters bonus", sorry that not everything is 100% fair.
February 01, 2018, 06:50:14 PM
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again...
To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct...
Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500...
This is not fair.
In the grand scheme of things, for a coin with an ultimate total supply of 1 Billion, the initial error is virtually negligible. Far more damage would be done to the reputation of the project by negating the work of those who saw the potential right from the start IMHO. Who would mine it if they knew that, should a bug be discovered in future and enough people complained about it not being fair, their mining time and wallets would be wiped out on a whim? And not just those who benefited from the bug either, but everyone.
Here, among the endless stream of worthless ICOs and copy/paste crap that makes up 99.9% of the Ann forum, is a project that at launch had a working product, a good whitepaper (albeit with some glaring typos), a decent website, wallets and pools ready to go, no ICO, no pre-mine, and a clear vision to be something other than a "me too" coin. You really want to risk all of that because a few people got lucky for a few hours?
Lucky for a few hours? Can you please consider browsing the blockchain explorer... just for the fun of it?
I totally agree with Speedie.
Also, a lot of coins in which the reward with blocks decreases..
The first miners were lucky and I'm happy for them.
February 01, 2018, 06:42:52 PM
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again...
To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct...
Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500...
This is not fair.
In the grand scheme of things, for a coin with an ultimate total supply of 1 Billion, the initial error is virtually negligible. Far more damage would be done to the reputation of the project by negating the work of those who saw the potential right from the start IMHO. Who would mine it if they knew that, should a bug be discovered in future and enough people complained about it not being fair, their mining time and wallets would be wiped out on a whim? And not just those who benefited from the bug either, but everyone.
Here, among the endless stream of worthless ICOs and copy/paste crap that makes up 99.9% of the Ann forum, is a project that at launch had a working product, a good whitepaper (albeit with some glaring typos), a decent website, wallets and pools ready to go, no ICO, no pre-mine, and a clear vision to be something other than a "me too" coin. You really want to risk all of that because a few people got lucky for a few hours?
Lucky for a few hours? Can you please consider browsing the blockchain explorer... just for the fun of it?
Project was less than 24 hours old when the bug was fixed. The timestamp of the 1st post is 31st January at 8:14 AM EST. The fix was announced in post 138 on 1st February at 8:13 AM EST.
February 01, 2018, 06:37:25 PM
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again...
To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct...
Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500...
This is not fair.
In the grand scheme of things, for a coin with an ultimate total supply of 1 Billion, the initial error is virtually negligible. Far more damage would be done to the reputation of the project by negating the work of those who saw the potential right from the start IMHO. Who would mine it if they knew that, should a bug be discovered in future and enough people complained about it not being fair, their mining time and wallets would be wiped out on a whim? And not just those who benefited from the bug either, but everyone.
Here, among the endless stream of worthless ICOs and copy/paste crap that makes up 99.9% of the Ann forum, is a project that at launch had a working product, a good whitepaper (albeit with some glaring typos), a decent website, wallets and pools ready to go, no ICO, no pre-mine, and a clear vision to be something other than a "me too" coin. You really want to risk all of that because a few people got lucky for a few hours?
Lucky for a few hours? Can you please consider browsing the blockchain explorer... just for the fun of it?
February 01, 2018, 06:32:54 PM
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again...
To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct...
Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500...
This is not fair.
In the grand scheme of things, for a coin with an ultimate total supply of 1 Billion, the initial error is virtually negligible. Far more damage would be done to the reputation of the project by negating the work of those who saw the potential right from the start IMHO. Who would mine it if they knew that, should a bug be discovered in future and enough people complained about it not being fair, their mining time and wallets would be wiped out on a whim?
Here, among the endless stream of worthless ICOs and copy/paste crap that makes up 99.9% of the Ann forum, is a project that at launch had a working product, a good whitepaper (albeit with some glaring typos), a decent website, wallets and pools ready to go, no ICO, no pre-mine, and a clear vision to be something other than a "me too" coin. You really want to risk all of that because a few people got lucky for a few hours?
You make a valid point.
Then Dev should continue mining with Rewards set to 10000 till another 10k or 20k blocks instead of suddenly reducing it to 500.
That would give a chance to everyone to get 10k rewards.
February 01, 2018, 06:28:24 PM
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again...
To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct...
Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500...
This is not fair.
In the grand scheme of things, for a coin with an ultimate total supply of 1 Billion, the initial error is virtually negligible. Far more damage would be done to the reputation of the project by negating the work of those who saw the potential right from the start IMHO. Who would mine it if they knew that, should a bug be discovered in future and enough people complained about it not being fair, their mining time and wallets would be wiped out on a whim? And not just those who benefited from the bug either, but everyone.
Here, among the endless stream of worthless ICOs and copy/paste crap that makes up 99.9% of the Ann forum, is a project that at launch had a working product, a good whitepaper (albeit with some glaring typos), a decent website, wallets and pools ready to go, no ICO, no pre-mine, and a clear vision to be something other than a "me too" coin. You really want to risk all of that because a few people got lucky for a few hours?
February 01, 2018, 06:03:09 PM
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again...
To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct...
Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500...
This is not fair.
I do have pool and explorer working and ready to rumble, unfortunately at this very moment I don't know if I should continue development or not...
February 01, 2018, 05:48:28 PM
Good luck! Great project! I have been mining since yesterday and am very excited about the future of this coin!
Me too
February 01, 2018, 05:27:28 PM
Good luck! Great project! I have been mining since yesterday and am very excited about the future of this coin!
February 01, 2018, 05:08:46 PM
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again...
To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct...
Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500...
This is not fair.
February 01, 2018, 05:06:42 PM
Dear Xavieron, explain where 652 IPBC coins disappeared
Private messages are closed
Private messages are closed
February 01, 2018, 05:00:33 PM
I don't get the difference between pool.ipbc.io and support.ipbc.io.
Why has one pool 10% fee and the other 1%?
Why is the support pool showing a hash rate of 920kH/s while the whole network just has 670 kH/s?
The 10% fee pool is where the IPBC platform mediaplayer-miners mine to. The other is for people who want to mine for themselves with their own tools.Why has one pool 10% fee and the other 1%?
Why is the support pool showing a hash rate of 920kH/s while the whole network just has 670 kH/s?
Perhaps the calculations shown for the whole network, being calculated estimates, might be somewhat inaccurate. Pool rate should be right.
same, me to i have trouble
I answered this earlier. The "-allpools 1" options ought to help you out. Hi,
I can't verify my account because I ddin't get the verification email.
Will you fix this?
Thanx
You didn't get the verification email? If we notice it being broken, we will try to fix it. Can you provide any more information, perhaps PM me the email used?I can't verify my account because I ddin't get the verification email.
Will you fix this?
Thanx
wallet, not full file, what its 
Seriously, this wallet must compile manual
are you kidding?
are you kidding?
hi, thank to reply
i had error, when i compile and build this wallet
im not understand, why must compile manual??
i had error, when i compile and build this wallet
im not understand, why must compile manual??
guys wallet its hard to build, how this? why not with already wallet simple??
i use os linux
If you check carefully, there are compiled linux releases located here:i use os linux
https://github.com/ipbc-dev/ipbc-wallet/releases
They should work for you. Just extract, chmod +x, and run.
Hi good day
Reserved Russian Translate BitcoinTalk.org & MiningClub.info .... okey?
thats my Work
https://miningclub.info/threads/ann-proekt-phobos-masternodes-pow-pos-ico.31603/
Russian was already reserved, as noted here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15XkjMx6DL6LTBbIcfdRY_PGHscTTkdRg_7sxiocN7gk/edit?usp=sharing Reserved Russian Translate BitcoinTalk.org & MiningClub.info .... okey?thats my Work
https://miningclub.info/threads/ann-proekt-phobos-masternodes-pow-pos-ico.31603/
the website was pretty so slow,I try to watch a movie but waiting for a long time.
I think it need more technology update.
We are working on improving everything. I think it need more technology update.
10,000 reward for a 2mins block? means 300,000 an hour , 7mil a day , 216mil a month, total supply 1bil , so means in around 4-5 months all the coins will be mined?
+1
I, too, are interested in such an issue.
Do not you think that this is very small? If so, why?
What will be the price of IPBC when listed on livecoin?
Not exactly something I can predict, sorry.uuuh im not luckly, still like this after download and extrack and chmod +x
im save on desktop file IPBC-Wallet-linux-x64-v1.0.2.0.zip
1. extrack
2. cd IPBC-Wallet
3. chmod +x IPBC-Wallet
And then:
./IPBC-Wallet
./IPBC-Wallet: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Please dev, create wallet for simple on linux
February 01, 2018, 03:45:31 PM
Can someone tell me how I can view the balance in my IPBC paper wallet? The windows wallet doesn't work on my Windows 7 machine.
I tried adding it to my account on IPBC.io, but nothing seems to happen there.
I tried adding it to my account on IPBC.io, but nothing seems to happen there.
February 01, 2018, 03:44:31 PM
Very interesting project, I hope you will succeed
February 01, 2018, 03:37:29 PM
Good luck devs
February 01, 2018, 03:21:40 PM
blockchain
Youtube + Twitch =======> IPBC.
It seems like a great project if you're keeping track of cryptocurrencies. Unfortunately, until the people know little about the cryptocurrency, the project will remain in the shadow.
February 01, 2018, 02:44:25 PM
Russian thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-ipbc-ico-2864245
bxc3BH7p92a6ZtisPdHZCU62Fgsc9xo8KE2MKZyisjv7S1W6uNH2NazQMZAL3rkd1rA9DhQaL3bjkFb ec4PV7Acd2Fjs2AL4m
bxc3BH7p92a6ZtisPdHZCU62Fgsc9xo8KE2MKZyisjv7S1W6uNH2NazQMZAL3rkd1rA9DhQaL3bjkFb ec4PV7Acd2Fjs2AL4m
February 01, 2018, 02:18:34 PM
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Jump to: