No, Pavel is doing exactly what the coin needs. He sees a security issue and he is addressing it.
Everyone wants flashy shit, they want this feature, that feature, fireworks and parades. None of that shit matters if the coin doesn't work. Most of the other PoS coins have had severe issues with their security, even the almighty DRK had issues with it's master-nodes. XC, their Dev turned out not to be the world class programmer they made him seem.
This anonymous fad is exactly that, a fad. They will come and go, people's heads will get turned every-time one coin does something that makes a good ROI and it will get copied relentlessly by every alt coming out from that moment.
We are lucky to have Pavel, do not forget that. He is focusing on strengthening the foundation of our coin and you can have all of the features in the world, but the second your coin goes tits up and starts double spending, or screwing up the network it will forever be tainted.
The people constantly going on about new features for new features sake are watching the price and nothing more. Slow and steady wins the race and Pavel knows better than anyone what technology the coin needs at it's heart to push forward. He is not only in demand by us, but countless other communities too. Is that not enough to prove his quality? If he thinks that security is the number one concern for Blackcoin right now, then we should shut up and listen to him and stop pretending we know better.
Please explain how PoS 2.0 is not innovative?
this.
addition:
if you ever read the notes on that ponzi game (i did not like that "scheme" at all despite the fact that it explained what will happen if you play, there could have probably been a better demo use case) you'd know that it was also a test for automated mass transactions, and in the first days when it had to handle hundreds of inputs and outputs in very short time it demonstrated how quick the BC technology is and that it can be used for all kind of near real-time use-cases in a quite impressive manner.
So this ponzi game could have been marketed as a real life mass transaction test. What are the results, have these been published? Did BC prove to be better than the others? Were all participating coins and their respective communities invited to test their coins against BlackCoin? I participated in the first game with 50 BC and got my 57 BC back, but when i heard that some coder had jumped the gun a send a bunch of transactions at the start of the game then I chose to not participate due to its unfair practices.
Anyway I hope the developer of the ponzi games publishes some of the statistics showing the advantages of BC in a mass transaction test.