How did you see my response and know to un-ignore me if I was ignored in the first place? Doesn't that block you from seeing that I post? Or just from seeing what I post, but you can still see that I post? (This is an honest question, I've never ignored somebody before so I wouldn't know).
You continue to use homosexuality as an insult.
I have seen that website before, and have had lots of good laughs looking through it.
How about you scour some true scientific literature and provide some concrete examples?
Here are a few reputable journals to start your journey with:
http://pubs.acs.org/http://www.sciencemag.org/http://www.pnas.org/http://www.nature.com/http://www.cell.com/http://www.embo.org/or just use pubmed to search through the collection of all publicly accessible articles:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedGoing to retreat into the shadows again since I've already been labeled a troll for a single comment that wasn't directed at blackcoin or the community, but rather directed at an individual who I personally and professionally disagree with and whom I doubt represents the community as a whole. If nothing else, please stop using homosexual and retarded as insults- it doesn't look intelligent or professional.
Ok, so don't believe that I had ignored you? Dumbass!
I can assure you that I had, I was still able to see that you had responded. How stupid are you?
Do you really live in such a leftwing echochamber that you are unaware that many climate scientists reject the warming theory completely? I guess so.
I remember listening to a City Club of Cleveland debate in 2007 where the global warming theory was decisively rejected. But I guess you are more tuned in to MSNBC.
As far as insults are concerned, I will continue to use any fucking insults I want to. I am extremely intelligent, and have absolute contempt for whatever bourgeois values you consider 'professional'. As Flaubert said, 'Hatred of the bourgeois is the beginning of wisdom', and I couldn't be less concerned about how I am perceived by fools like you.
Read this, idiot:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/01/26/newsbytes-global-warming-downgraded-james-lovelock-recants/Your favorite site is a well known propaganda site, full of red herrings and false reporting. Link ONE peer-reviewed study (like you know what that even is) and I will be amazed...
The less than a tenth of a percent of 'climate scientists' that 'reject' global warming have a paper trail leading directly to their funding - always oil or associated businesses.
Those of us with an actual background in the sciences have no confusion about climate change, and nothing you read in your incredibly unqualified sources can change the matters we have studied and revealed over the past SIXTY years.
...but you know that, deep inside, and you will never admit it, so I am wasting my time.
