Topic: [ANN] [BLTZ] [IPO Hybrid] BlitzCoin | proof of concept coin | pure speculative - page 46. (Read 200984 times)
March 27, 2014, 01:53:41 PM
Do we need to download the new win wallet?
March 27, 2014, 01:50:41 PM
If you prefer one p2pnetwork than removing the source is not the solution
The solution is to move back to the old network prefix since this is used by almost all p2pnodes available
just my 2 cents
E: the source of omarg uses the old network prefix ...
P2Pool guys need to stick together. Just one P2Pool network.
I'll remove the code form OP to prevent new P2Pools use it.
If you can tell me where is a code most P2Pools are using, I'll publish in OP new code and delist pools using different code.
March 27, 2014, 01:48:13 PM
March 27, 2014, 01:30:41 PM
HashFever is getting a lot of DDOS 
Can someone recommend a good pool that is in the right fork and that doesn't have much attention from the DDOSers ?
Can someone recommend a good pool that is in the right fork and that doesn't have much attention from the DDOSers ?http://xhash.net
very stable, no downtime or dc's and on right chain!
Having much better time right now on https://bltz.crunchharder.net. Was fine on hashfever until about 45 minutes ago. Did crunchharder most of yesterday, it went without problems. Just bear in mind it's a smaller pool. Great interface, payouts work as they're supposed to, right fork. Alternatively, dwarf is always a solid pool. That's my next fallback if any problems arise.
Thanks I will try them out.
March 27, 2014, 01:24:35 PM
sync is stuck at 985 blocks behind. Already added the new nodes. Someone else with this problem?
March 27, 2014, 01:21:39 PM
If you prefer one p2pnetwork than removing the source is not the solution
The solution is to move back to the old network prefix since this is used by almost all p2pnodes available
just my 2 cents
E: the source of omarg uses the old network prefix ...
P2Pool guys need to stick together. Just one P2Pool network.
I'll remove the code form OP to prevent new P2Pools use it.
If you can tell me where is a code most P2Pools are using, I'll publish in OP new code and delist pools using different code.
March 27, 2014, 01:16:07 PM
HashFever is getting a lot of DDOS Can someone recommend a good pool that is in the right fork and that doesn't have much attention from the DDOSers ?
Can someone recommend a good pool that is in the right fork and that doesn't have much attention from the DDOSers ?http://xhash.net
very stable, no downtime or dc's and on right chain!
Having much better time right now on https://bltz.crunchharder.net. Was fine on hashfever until about 45 minutes ago. Did crunchharder most of yesterday, it went without problems. Just bear in mind it's a smaller pool. Great interface, payouts work as they're supposed to, right fork. Alternatively, dwarf is always a solid pool. That's my next fallback if any problems arise.
March 27, 2014, 12:57:00 PM
what am i doing wrong my wallet just syncs to block 1256 although ive deleted the blitzcoin folder 
what can i do to make it work? 
March 27, 2014, 12:56:00 PM
This coin is a perfect example of how even the worst news is good news.
Come on, 24 hours later and some pools are still forking??
Come on, 24 hours later and some pools are still forking??
March 27, 2014, 12:52:36 PM
Why are there so many people mining this? 
March 27, 2014, 12:52:30 PM
Any news regarding ipo shares?
March 27, 2014, 12:52:14 PM
looks like a lot of pools are also on the wrong fork. noone knows how to get to the correct fork. many pools already dead. well...back to another coin 
How to tell if I'm on the correct fork or not?
current block: 2182
current diff: 114.88
you can check it at http://cryptexplorer.com/chain/BlitzCoin
Block Explorer is correct
Ok so it seems like http://bltz.hashfever.com is on the correct fork, thankfully.
I think and http://bltz.okaypool.com/index.php?page=dashboard is in the correct chain
It is ridiculous. After 24hr , there is still fork???
March 27, 2014, 12:51:22 PM
what am i doing wrong my wallet just syncs to block 1256 although ive deleted the blitzcoin folder
March 27, 2014, 12:49:34 PM
checkpoints updated
https://github.com/blitzcoin/BlitzCoin
compiling win wallet win new checkpoints. In aprox 1h it will be ready
https://github.com/blitzcoin/BlitzCoin
compiling win wallet win new checkpoints. In aprox 1h it will be ready
March 27, 2014, 12:49:15 PM
The current p2pnode status is as follows
- all nodes are on the correct chain
- the largest p2pnetwork ist the one that we provide with the highest hashpower (180MH vs. 50MH)
- omarG's sourcecode still refers to the old network
- omarG refuses to switch back, even though it is easier to switch 3 nodes than 7+ total right? Especially while omarG is/was in contact with the pool owners
For the benefit of p2p it would be best to only have 1 network - and I propose to use the one with the largest amount of nodes and hashrate..
what code are you using now? do I need to remove source code from OP?
I am using the code from omarG and now it is working - but the network prefix is still on the old network.
As for now you can leave it since all nodes are on the correct chain and no more problems will occur.
I encourage omarG to move back to the old p2pnetwork and then its one big network.
Other option is that I push a new sourcecode to git and things can be resolved.
Either is fine - pm me for what solution you prefer
I prefer one P2Pool network, hence I'll remove the code if all other pools are using different
If you prefer one p2pnetwork than removing the source is not the solution
The solution is to move back to the old network prefix since this is used by almost all p2pnodes available
just my 2 cents
E: the source of omarg uses the old network prefix ...
March 27, 2014, 12:48:12 PM
HashFever is getting a lot of DDOS Can someone recommend a good pool that is in the right fork and that doesn't have much attention from the DDOSers ?
Can someone recommend a good pool that is in the right fork and that doesn't have much attention from the DDOSers ?http://xhash.net
very stable, no downtime or dc's and on right chain!
March 27, 2014, 12:46:13 PM
The current p2pnode status is as follows
- all nodes are on the correct chain
- the largest p2pnetwork ist the one that we provide with the highest hashpower (180MH vs. 50MH)
- omarG's sourcecode still refers to the old network
- omarG refuses to switch back, even though it is easier to switch 3 nodes than 7+ total right? Especially while omarG is/was in contact with the pool owners
For the benefit of p2p it would be best to only have 1 network - and I propose to use the one with the largest amount of nodes and hashrate..
what code are you using now? do I need to remove source code from OP?
I am using the code from omarG and now it is working - but the network prefix is still on the old network.
As for now you can leave it since all nodes are on the correct chain and no more problems will occur.
I encourage omarG to move back to the old p2pnetwork and then its one big network.
Other option is that I push a new sourcecode to git and things can be resolved.
Either is fine - pm me for what solution you prefer
I prefer one P2Pool network, hence I'll remove the code if all other pools are using different
March 27, 2014, 12:42:38 PM
The current p2pnode status is as follows
- all nodes are on the correct chain
- the largest p2pnetwork ist the one that we provide with the highest hashpower (180MH vs. 50MH)
- omarG's sourcecode still refers to the old network
- omarG refuses to switch back, even though it is easier to switch 3 nodes than 7+ total right? Especially while omarG is/was in contact with the pool owners
For the benefit of p2p it would be best to only have 1 network - and I propose to use the one with the largest amount of nodes and hashrate..
what code are you using now? do I need to remove source code from OP?
I am using the code from omarG and now it is working - but the network prefix is still on the old network.
As for now you can leave it since all nodes are on the correct chain and no more problems will occur.
I encourage omarG to move back to the old p2pnetwork and then its one big network.
Other option is that I push a new sourcecode to git and things can be resolved.
Either is fine - pm me for what solution you prefer
Edit: last block found by p2pool
Code:
18:41 <[CV]-BLTZ-92> BLITZCOIN BLOCK FOUND by BHGWRkznZR4dUtG4gHEqbVHtnx5L1tYSLm! http://cryptexplorer.com/block/25cb72699bccfaabaed23c7049e8121d3c8fceea4598e8825eea0abd1301661c
This was found by http://p2pools.cryptoprojects.eu:9333
March 27, 2014, 12:41:31 PM
URL: http://www.xhash.net
Pool info:
VARDIFF / Stratum / Prop / 1% fee / on the right chain / no downtime
March 27, 2014, 12:39:44 PM
[...]
I saw this post after sending out mine.... I haven't found a wallet address that has gotten paid for ALL the blocks I listed....
I checked a few others and see payments, but not for all blocks... I guess its possible they stopped minnig for a bit... but don't think so since the payouts would have deviated more I think..
which Node/Nodes were bad ?
I saw this post after sending out mine.... I haven't found a wallet address that has gotten paid for ALL the blocks I listed....
I checked a few others and see payments, but not for all blocks... I guess its possible they stopped minnig for a bit... but don't think so since the payouts would have deviated more I think..
which Node/Nodes were bad ?
Only 1 node was compromised - and it is fixed now.
Do you even know how p2pool submits its blocks?!?!?! And why this problem happened?
I guess no, so here is more clarification:
The node with the miner that finds the block submits it against his blockchain..
Thus meaning if that daemon is in the wrong chain, it is submitted against the wrong chain, even though the shares and everything was correct.
So what happened was, that in the beginning the node with the forked chain did have a high difficulty as well, thus the miners on that node did not find a block that easily and it was equal amongst the whole p2pnetwork.
Once the chain issues started to get resolved, the difficulty on that node started to decrease and apparently their miners found blocks against the wrong chain and submitted the shares of the other p2pnodes as well.
Once this issue got resolved this morning, payouts on the "old p2p network" are back to normal
Now please stop the fud - if you need analysis come to irc and talk to me- the nick is mrpj
Jump to: