Topic: [ANN]🌀 Blur Network(BLUR) 🌀 | PoW Cryptonight-Dynamic | CPU/Solo Mining | DPoW - page 20. (Read 41328 times)

Have there been any benchmarks on the kind of performance we should expect on CPUs like for an AMD Ryzen for example?

Isn't it right to say that 99% of "decentralized" platforms are rigged due to some premine, instamine or shady initial distribution?

If you join my Discord server (or Telegram), I'm very transparent about being the sole individual behind this project.  I think that your opinion there is a gross generalization, as well as an inaccurate one.  If you believe that decentralized platforms are rigged to that extent, I'm not sure why you participate in supporting any network that would have practices such as those.  I wouldn't.

It can be unlock, but as with most other coins that get launched by an unknown person the launch has been well prepared in advance and hardware has been set up to get an advantage. That is how it usually works and we all know it.

You're incorrect, there.  I don't mine the currency myself, at all, apart from testing purposes.  I simply run the seed nodes with no mining in the background even.  There is a donate option, should you decide to put any of your HR toward my development fund... However, the donate option is disabled by default...

The reason you are finding less blocks can be due to "luck" which is a component of randomness, or the fact that in any blockchain, the easiest to mine blocks are mined first.  As the network progresses, blocks become increasingly difficult to solve, on average.  With a similar hashrate on an i7-7700HQ, I have seen similar results on occasion.  It really does vary a bit.

I failed to get a single block on AMD FX6300, although h/s is not bad

I do not want to make a pool - I'm talking about some kind of decentralization, although the network capacity is unrealistically high - it's unclear what it supports. either himself on the GPU and ASIC

I do not exclude the possibility that the developer produces coins (supports the network) on the GPU
Too much power of the network, given that the coin was just launched.

============================================

nethash: ~350 kH/s
Prior to this, netnash was 550-600 kH/s
1 ryzen 1700 get - 3 kH/s
I do not think that the developer has 150 hi-end ryzen machines.
Most likely there is somewhere there is a GPU miner

The asic, GPU resistance feature looks great but how much does a person mine on an old system?

Im mine about 24 hours with 1kh/s and did not guess a any block, why? And algorithm was not good because coin was mine only hi-end equipment.

I'm not sure what you're taking issue with, here.  Given a long enough time mining, you'll have actually a greater chance of mining coins.  With pools you would need to contribute a share greater than the pool difficulty.  That's very unlikely if you're hashing 200 vs a pool of 2000s.  Luck is fair.  Diluting hashes to give fractions of coins while a pool operator takes commission, is not. 

The lesser of the two evils here results in A.) You receiving more coins.  B.) No single operator being able to launch a 51% attack and you potentially suffer a loss in an outright theft of coins.

Roadmap:
Brave claim
Given that the coin still can not normally be recovered.

At what stage will the working version of the stratum be available?
I can not make a coin without a pool.
My servers issue 100-200 hashes, while the ryzen in people under 2000

No one except you and your premine had time to get the coins, and you were already going to the stock exchange to go out!

July 2018
Exchange Listing(s)

OK, cool.  So you're right about the premine.  It was months ago that I read the Nerva announcement and I jumbled that information with another coin, so apologies.

You didn't delete my somewhat negative comment so kudos to you.  That was half of my test to see if you were legit (in my eyes).

So currently at least you feel the major - and perhaps only difference - between Nerva and Blur is the block rewards as neither your project nor Nerva have mentioned other focuses yet (which is fine, getting a truly CPU-bound algorithm down is enough to put someone into top 50 CMC after a few years).  I'll add a little hashpower to your network, though I am still *more* interested in Nerva but I am open to having you change my mind.

I would like to bring up that I am a part of the Guardian team and we just released our beta escrow platform.  It is the first piece of software we released in our ecosystem.  Over the next 12 months we're going to be releasing a rather astounding suite of programs designed to prevent fraud in cryptocurrency.  Safe P2P transactions is one of several dozen areas we are targeting.  I don't want to get into *too* much more detail until our whitepaper comes out in a few days but that's the general gist of things.

Anyway currently listing on our platform is cheap as it's a beta release (thoroughly bug tested, it's safe) and we are trying to build our userbase and awareness of our product.  Trading using our platform is also cheaper than using exchanges as we only charge the blockchain transaction fee after initial listing.  One of our beginning goals with the escrow platform is to provide coins with limited exchange access a way to safely trade/sell their coins.  Listing cost is 1000 GDNC which comes out to about 150 USD.  As our full suite of software starts coming out and the scope of Guardian is recognized we are hoping to be the tide that lifts some other smaller but *extremely* valuable projects.  I am currently working to list Nerva and I believe having Blur on the platform would be beneficial too.

If you're interested in discussing it further let me know, send me a PM.  If you like you can look at our escrow platform:

https://escrow.guardiancoin.online/