Seriously, you're tinfoil tier retarded. I'm not going to bother arguing with you since it's a complete waste of my time, so this is all I'm going to say before putting you on ignore;
If you don't like the direction we're taking, sell your coins and move on to another coin. Simple.
Mad, tinfoil retarded? I imagine you still think there were planes at 9/11.
What's wrong? You've not answered one question or legitimate challenge presented to you yet?
Dont like the direction who are taking? Who's we? Wil, Mo and a secret, not to mention, well funded, mystery investor. Ooh.
How many coins do you have? None?
How many coins do you have between you? None?
How long is the duration of the investment contract, I presume you have a copy of the contract? There isnt one?
How much are you selling the additional 10 million coins to the investor for? Oh a nice £50,000 profit each for you and Mo in 6 months perhaps?
You do realise that if other stakeholders with lots of coins agree with me, and exchanges agree with me, we can just stay on the current fork and your new coins will be worth nothing and you wont be able to dump on an exchange, you do know that right? Consensus rules.. I hope your investor knows that aswell, have you told him/her/them?
Slippery slope my friend, slippery slope...
You say "consensus rules" and that's the only thing that you said I agree with.
You are the only person who's against this, everyone else is on-board.
So everyone who has a stake in Britcoin has contacted you directly and confirmed they are on board? So you have at least over 5 million britcoin's worth (majority consensus) of stakeholder confirmations?
You must be very clear to state if you do or dont Wil.
I noted that FiftySeven has queried why you need to create more coins and I have sent him a PM.
Ok here's the thing
I am an investor with £10 million, another 9 people equally have an investment of £10 million in a bank called Wils Bank. We all have 10 million coins each. One investor Wil decides to create 100% more coins because he wants to without the permission of his fellow investors. Due to inflation/QE each of the coins in circulation becomes worth 50% of their original value, where as the investor who's investment also decreases to £5 million but from the coins he creates sits pretty with an additional £45 million from his fellow stakeholders. OOh how do you think the other stakeholders will feel with that sort of loss? There is simply no argument. It is unfair, ungentlemanly, and I dont agree with doing so. What is your impact assessment on the value and the trust of such as move? Have you researched and published a document featuring comments from stakeholders? No Wil you havnt.
Creating more coins, without 100% or as close as possible consensus, from investors/stakeholders/miners is criminal. It is in fact money laundering. It's a crime lol.
Do you for one second think if the UK Government/HM Treasury as an investor would simply allow you to create more coins and reduce their investment (without a guarantee of a significant return) you are absolutely deluded.
IF you fork simply to create more coins for no other purpose than at the instruction of an investor whom remains secret and untraceable to investors then you will have broken the trust of the chain, its investors, and more importantly you will have brought the "Brit" brand into disrepute, seriously thin ice my friend.
Ok here's my proposal;
You create a not for profit organisation of which major stakeholders of Britcoin are non paying members.
You make sure all payments from your investor go to the not for profit which then pays salaries for appointed developers so all transactions are recorded.
You make an application for a trademark as property of the not for profit on behalf of its stakeholders and members worldwide.
You do not create more coins on the chain otherwise it breaches the trust of the coin and its users.
Any coins distributed in the chain are by agreement of stakeholders and members and must be distributed by the existing POS program.
Any changes or updates must be approved in writing and advance notice to allow objection.
Remove the crown from Britcoin, it's illegal, I have advised a number of times.
You must allow a stakeholder position on the board for future independent nations of Britain - e.g. Northern Ireland, England, Scotland, Wales - as they will wish to be part of the guiding and regulating body
It is non-negotiable. As over a 5% stakeholder in Britcoin in good faith, and in the interests of fairness, I decline to support a further instamine of coins from the chain and oppose the fork. I am sure others will support such a move quite quickly once they understand the implications.
I approve increasing the coin count (possibly to 21 million) ONLY through a set period of increased POS as discussed previously.
Sorry, you cant just print coins at your discretion, and trying to persuade people who dont understand the nature of what your doing to support you is very misleading.
I don't wish to be rude, but I really think you are way out of your depth at this point, and the heat is only going to get turned up once the UK Government/HM Treasury notice Britcoin is already operating (and if Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland do not achieve financial independents from England, I am afraid you have no defence in using the Brit brand).
I am trying to be helpful!
