CSW has never presented any evidence of being Satoshi.
^ This
Article: The Craig Wright May 2016 Signing Sessions Debacle, In Full Context
- https://mylegacykit.medium.com/the-craig-wright-may-2016-signing-sessions-debacle-in-full-context-338e2b316310
by MyLegacyKit (twitter).
Excerpt: "Intro
In Bitcoin, signing a message is a cryptographical way to prove control and ownership of a public bitcoin address (using the associated private key) via a feature in the Bitcoin wallet. The procedure of signing takes less than a minute to perform, and the output -a so called digital signature, a lengthy string of letters and numbers- can be used by others to verify said ownership and control."
...
"The proof posted today by Wright and others does not meet any standard for identifying him as Nakamoto." - Nik Cubrilovic, May 2, 2016
Please read:
"The Craig Wright May 2016 Signing Sessions Debacle, In Full Context"
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1410385155085291526
...
"Facts: Craig Wright has NOT signed with the known satoshi PGP Key associated with the bitcoin whitepaper .pdf , http://bitcoin.org and satoshin @ gmx . com
- https://web.archive.org/web/20090303195936/http://bitcoin.org/
- https://web.archive.org/web/20110228054007/http://www.bitcoin.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc
Therefore, he is NOT the identity 'Satoshi Nakamoto'."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1410385155085291526
...
"Considering the above facts alone.
Would you 'trust' and judge Craig Wright to be the identity 'Satoshi Nakamoto', creator of #Bitcoin #BTC ?
Yes or No"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_XBT/status/1410559807006953472