Pretty much every part of this sentence is untrue, or at best incorrect.
- Bitcoin's block size cap is the result of consensus among the Bitcoin network and is not "centrally-planned."
- This limits the "production quota on transactions" only when talking about on-chain transactions.
- The value of anything is determined by those who value it. It is an opinion which requires human beings to formulate and does not exist on its own accord.
Conclude whatever you want about the value of huge blocks which have centralized your coin down to a relative handful of nodes -- I don't really care. What you don't get to pretend (without ridicule) is that BSV is in any shape or form the manifestation of "Satoshi's vision."
May 20th, 2019: price of BSV is $61.70
May 21st, 2019: Craig registers copyright for Bitcoin white paper, price goes up 20%
May 29th, 2019: China "fake news tweet" says Wright transferred 50,000 BTC to Binance
June 25th, 2019: BSV reaches local high of $242
August 27th, 2019: Judge Reinhart rules against Wright, orders payment of 500,000 BTC to Kleiman estate
September 19th, 2019: Wright and Kleiman enter settlement discussions
December 19th, 2019: BSV reaches local low of $80
January 11th, 2020: Judge Bloom drops sanctions on Wright, gives him more time to receive documents from bonded courier
January 15th, 2020: BSV reaches local high of $343
Then pretty much every noticeable move since then has been tied to coronavirus economic fallout.
You speak of hacked and segshit injected segwit coin?
Btc is not bitcoin.
Lots of issues and tech dept
Not ready for finance
https://decrypt.co/31463/bitcoin-segwit-bug-fix-could-lock-wallet-users-out-funds
BSV is BitCoin. Fixxed and ready to use