Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 64. (Read 226361 times)

hv_
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
nuthlida? jberher? I see you guys are having a nice party here eh?

When moon btw?

P.S.: Oh, and I would like a clone too... May I suggest bitsevre? Maybe bitsewer? Whatever it fits will be fine, I just want to be part of it.

Nice Party most have - for the fun

Some for the hate but that has short life


Moon is coming for capacity - not so much fiat-Price (yet - and who knows that to predict) - obviously these times when winter Comes

legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1530
Self made HODLER ✓


Right. But I ain't lending. Not to an unknown, certainly. More than that, I ain't lending to nobody since one of my friends got unjustly popped by the feds for ostensibly 'operating an unlicensed money transfer business'. Later all charges dropped, it still cost him like a quarter million bux, at least one client, and untold hours of his life.


May I ask what does that quarter million bux account for if the charges were dropped? Lawyer fees? If that's the case that's a really fucked up system yeah.

Was it bitcoin related or just regular fiat loans that somehow turned wrong?

Extortion, if you ask me. Under color of law. Bitcoin. It's all pretty well documented in old posts on this here forum.

Then I guess you mean that guy (can't remember the nick) that has its website in the sig where he explains it all. Yeah, I remember it. Really fucked up story.

Yup. BurtW. And yes, I count him as a friend. And a cautionary tale about this fucked up world in which we live. Introduced me to Bitcoin, as a matter of fact.




Yup, BurtW that's the guy.

I know what kind of fucked up world I live in. Even though I reckon that most any time in the past was way more fucked up though.

Wanna know how I got started in Bitcoin? I'll tell you anyways:

I never had much income, but enough to save some year after year since I was twentysomething. Again not much, maybe one year 200€, other 3000€, sometimes more sometimes less... everything added up year after year... for a bunch of years.

Then I thought I needed to have some spare cash at hand, outside the bank. No matter if it wouldn't give me interest but, you know, just an in case I "accidentally killed someone or anything" and had to immediately run out of the country thing. Or something I could have free from seized for whatever reason (be it accidentally or well deserved).

It wasn't much, maybe 10K€ cash, enough to sustain for a while on the run if that ever happened. Maybe at some point it was more than that, but not much more and that's unimportant.  

Then I heard about Bitcoin. So I thought it wouldn't hurt to exchange $3K€ into it, just in case. At that point a BTC was like 50€. I went to localbitcoins and looked at the ads for a local in cash meeting. It would have been around 60 BTC. It turned out none of ads were "real". It was all transfer me the money and I transfer you the BTC, either via bank transfer or paypal. That really turned me off because it was the off-bank money that I wanted to exchange. Haven't you ever heard me saying never mix banking fiat with out-the-system fiat? Well, that's my motto.

But that motto ended me with a lame 2 BTC purchase for 100€ via paypal just to test the waters. Instead of the 3000€/60BTC I really tried hard to exchange in person to no avail.

Of course one could argue that if buying BTC at that time were easier it would have not been priced so low. That's fair.

Anyways.... the main point of my story is that... I went to Bitcoin because I wanted to have some (no matter how little) money stored "out of the system". Probably that's also the reason I didn't ever sell in the subsequent rises (kept buying instead... at way higher prices though).

Yes, I do know how fucked up the system can be if it goes against you. Some insurance against it is very wise move. Never went into this to turn "rich"... even though I almost dreamed about it when BTC was at $20K and it looked like it could keep going. For me it was just a "hedge"/insurance. It still is... even if now I sometimes dream of obtaining some richness out of it too.


legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight


Right. But I ain't lending. Not to an unknown, certainly. More than that, I ain't lending to nobody since one of my friends got unjustly popped by the feds for ostensibly 'operating an unlicensed money transfer business'. Later all charges dropped, it still cost him like a quarter million bux, at least one client, and untold hours of his life.


May I ask what does that quarter million bux account for if the charges were dropped? Lawyer fees? If that's the case that's a really fucked up system yeah.

Was it bitcoin related or just regular fiat loans that somehow turned wrong?

Extortion, if you ask me. Under color of law. Bitcoin. It's all pretty well documented in old posts on this here forum.





Right. But I ain't lending. Not to an unknown, certainly. More than that, I ain't lending to nobody since one of my friends got unjustly popped by the feds for ostensibly 'operating an unlicensed money transfer business'. Later all charges dropped, it still cost him like a quarter million bux, at least one client, and untold hours of his life.


May I ask what does that quarter million bux account for if the charges were dropped? Lawyer fees? If that's the case that's a really fucked up system yeah.

Was it bitcoin related or just regular fiat loans that somehow turned wrong?

Extortion, if you ask me. Under color of law. Bitcoin. It's all pretty well documented in old posts on this here forum.

Then I guess you mean that guy (can't remember the nick) that has its website in the sig where he explains it all. Yeah, I remember it. Really fucked up story.

Yup. BurtW. And yes, I count him as a friend. And a cautionary tale about this fucked up world in which we live. Introduced me to Bitcoin, as a matter of fact.

Quote
P.S.: I see you still have that "heresy" thing in your sig. I don't know if it is just that Lauda retracted that shit or that it isn't showing because he/she is not on DT1 anymore. Anyways, maybe it is time to already turn the page as it is unimportant anymore? Just saying.

Thanks for the suggestion. Just checked. Lauda still has me negged. For no reason other than s/he doesn't like the fact that I like the other Bitcoins. This predates DT1 by a large margin. Hence hir participation in DT1 is irrelevant. For that matter, DT1 is irrelevant in and of itself. So there's that too.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1530
Self made HODLER ✓


Right. But I ain't lending. Not to an unknown, certainly. More than that, I ain't lending to nobody since one of my friends got unjustly popped by the feds for ostensibly 'operating an unlicensed money transfer business'. Later all charges dropped, it still cost him like a quarter million bux, at least one client, and untold hours of his life.


May I ask what does that quarter million bux account for if the charges were dropped? Lawyer fees? If that's the case that's a really fucked up system yeah.

Was it bitcoin related or just regular fiat loans that somehow turned wrong?
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
Please help your fellow BSV-er (wrighter? what do you call yourselves?):

BSV-er is fine for me. Wrighter, OTOH, I'm not answering to.

I'm sure someone here has a large enough bag for that, right?

C'mon, man!  You know trolls don't actually live the lies they spread.  Who in their right mind would hold on to 1 BSV, let alone 100? 

Clueless.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight


Oh Gawd. Try to live right, and this is how one is rewarded. Note: ^^^ not me.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
There is a lot that (the real) nutildah says with which I do not agree.

However, this nutlidah impostor should rethink their approach. It seems evident that the username was chosen to intentionally deceive. Very poor taste. I doubt you're fooling anyone. You're only making yourself look bad.
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
Epic
People can pay BTC and BCH to merchants in BSV Network soon, 0-conf, no jam and traceability. It looks better then LN😀
https://twitter.com/i/status/1205536882592903168

Edit
Tech Prophet George Gilder openly admits he believes Craig Wright CSW is Satoshi Nakamoto
https://youtu.be/U6gV5yHKwC8

Yes, this is fun. And there is no identity proof by signing with a key. Not registered before...

Anyhow tax and other deductions are real proof, even deep understanding of Bitcoin as it should be.

https://mobile.twitter.com/jimmy_crypto/status/1206234651662192640

Ponzibtc doesnt hodl sov

Not safu

Play games on bsv is fun

Peergames.com. Helps a lot getting over crypto winter

 Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
Epic
People can pay BTC and BCH to merchants in BSV Network soon, 0-conf, no jam and traceability. It looks better then LN😀
https://twitter.com/i/status/1205536882592903168

Edit
Tech Prophet George Gilder openly admits he believes Craig Wright CSW is Satoshi Nakamoto
https://youtu.be/U6gV5yHKwC8
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
New miners on the block?

https://coingeek.com/shenzhen-mining-pool-nourpool-mines-first-bsv-block/

Nour!


Why?  

Cause facts more important than opinion. Love that brain

https://mobile.twitter.com/CryptoBlueBird/status/1205140010858635275


Extent

Sure Bitcoin can do what all other scammy coins promis. But better and compliant.

https://mobile.twitter.com/EdPownall/status/1205475783998951424

2020 gonna be fun


 Grin
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
I see at least 3 different 'ticker' Projects still running a hash war on SHA256
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
If BSV would have won the Hash War, there would be no BSV. It would still be called "Bitcoin Cash."

Because -- obviously -- the most important aspect of a protocol is what the public chooses to call it. /sarc



If BSV would have won the Hash War, there would be no BSV. It would still be called "Bitcoin Cash."

Because -- obviously -- the most important aspect of a protocol is what the public chooses to call it. /sarc

Again, you're being willfully obtuse in an attempt to muddy the issue. That has nothing to do with the point I was making, which is that Craig didn't plan on losing the hash war. Only afterward did he scramble to create an independent identity for his blockchain. Regardless, "Bitcoin SV" is the name given to the project by Craig, not the public, so I don't even understand what your point was.

My point was that the claim that BitPotus' specious claim that BSV "is based on the lies of Craig" is false, and that BSV is instead based upon the original Bitcoin protocol. To which you -- in the dissembling fashion you typically employ -- waded in with yet another deflecting non-sequitur.

Can you point to anyone having gone to war planning to lose? What the heck was your point?

How limited is your attention span?





Stop trying to pretend like BSV started out with the mission to re-create the "Original Bitcoin" (+ enormous amounts of data stuffed in its blocks). It didn't. It started out with the mission of being Bitcoin Cash.

Sure. And Bitcoin Cash's original mission was to be a defuckified version of Bitcoin i.e., re-creating the original Bitcoin.

Time isn't after us.
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
Nobody is forcing you to use Segwit by the way

Suuuurrrre.

People changed the bitcoin protocol.... other people didn't adopt those protocol alterations (segwit and opdsv).   It's quite simple.

Nobody is forcing you to use a Bech32 adress, you can use a Legacy adress.

https://medium.com/@buddhasource/bitcoin-legacy-vs-segwit-wallet-address-what-is-the-difference-cb2e71ab8381

Nobody is forcing u to use a coin that runs on up to 3 different histories, has nothing to do with BitCOin any more - but has ticker BTC

Use something much more transparent and scalable
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
About why there was a poker game in first verion of BitCoin

the original and the origin at SIGMA 2019

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Tv1Pn24pFg

Telling the Story that nobody is able to tell - also about fraud and tokens ( so haters ll call the truth is fraud - we know)
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Nobody is forcing you to use Segwit by the way

Suuuurrrre.

People changed the bitcoin protocol.... other people didn't adopt those protocol alterations (segwit and opdsv).   It's quite simple.
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
^^^

Its hard to argue with that because you're not making any sense.

If BSV would have won the Hash War, there would be no BSV. It would still be called "Bitcoin Cash." Only after they lost did Craig scramble to find reasons to make his failed fork its own coin. At the beginning it had no logo, no wallets, no block explorer, and no white paper -- but they solved that last part by just claiming Satoshi's WP as their own. There's basically no reason for it to exist other than to scam noobs.

Guess u mixing up  BitCoin with tickers AGAIN - cause u wanna scam ppl int buy shit ?

BitCoin had no Logo, Ticker, whatever

It had a White paper and some code - here we go with what is BSV ( sure  again a stupid ticker ...)



If you insist on calling your fraudulent scamcoin "Bitcoin," then yes, tickers are absolutely necessary.

Nobody should give financial advice - no fraud seen here. It's ur Little mind that frauds yourself

BitCoin is Satoshi's Vision - not Segwit, not CTOR, not dev's world

If some try to reduce BitCoin to a ticker - that is fraud
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
@nutildah How is that LNX altcoin progressing can it still be exchanged 1:1 with BTC? Any decoupling timeline info available?



@nutildah How is that LNX altcoin progressing can it still be exchanged 1:1 with BTC? Any decoupling timeline info available?

I have no idea what you're talking about, never heard of it.

Lol, Bitfinex added altcoin LNX support a week ago. Still one for one exchangeable missing out on this opportunity can be costly.
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
BSVtards whole fucking shitcoin is based on the lies of Craig.

Well, no.

BSV is based upon the original Bitcoin protocol. Before 'devs gotta dev' set in, and arguably fucked the whole thing up.

Well, no.

BSV was an attempt to claim the title of Bitcoin Cash that didn't really have a plan if it failed. Only after Craig lost the hash war did he come up with the whole "original Bitcoin protocol" nonsense and the idea of stuffing data into absurdly huge blocks.

You can rewrite history in the most favorable light for your shitcoin, but at the end of the day its still a shitcoin developed by a con artist.

Well, no.

U write ur own nuti history again, try that in little trolly sandbox - there u can listen to ya own.

BSV has all the rights on its sight to be and foremost STAY true original BitCoin forever.

That's the thrill and the trigger for all those who either never wanted to understand BitCoin and all what it could do from the very beginning or understood a bit, but tried to alter it cause of fear or make own crap out of it.

Keep it as is, or play the Buterin and call it different
jr. member
Activity: 53
Merit: 6
BSVtards whole fucking shitcoin is based on the lies of Craig.

Well, no.

BSV is based upon the original Bitcoin protocol. Before 'devs gotta dev' set in, and arguably fucked the whole thing up.

Well, no.

BSV was an attempt to claim the title of Bitcoin Cash that didn't really have a plan if it failed. Only after Craig lost the hash war did he come up with the whole "original Bitcoin protocol" nonsense and the idea of stuffing data into absurdly huge blocks.

You can rewrite history in the most favorable light for your shitcoin, but at the end of the day its still a shitcoin developed by a con artist.

Its not failed, I would say it went in the unexpected direction b/c at some point Academic Craig Wright got covetous and stopped sending his buddy Roger Ver his 20% cut from newly mined blocks which led to Roger dropping support for Craigs coin. Dont ya recall how BSV network was inundated with transactions? Much activity much hype. Which is now nowhere to be seen. Because Roger has lately abstained from spamming BSV chain with fake tx.

How do you ‘spam’ the chain? There is no such thing as ‘spam’ when a miner is rewarded for the transaction.
Pages:
Jump to: