You think the judge would issue a warrant?
Interesting. I was not aware CSW owed Ver anything. How much, and what for?
Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 91. (Read 226361 times)
You think the judge would issue a warrant?
Interesting. I was not aware CSW owed Ver anything. How much, and what for?
The only thing this image demonstrates is the depths to which BSV people will sink to spread misinformation, and also that they are planning on taking over the BTC logo.
You're going to need to create better fake news than this if you want BSV to go up in price. Maybe release a tweet in Korean about how Craig signed a message from the Genesis Block.
Theres nothing wrong with how blog.bollocks.com puts it. BSV advocates know from private CW-controlled channels that another huge tide is coming up and that a lot of boats are gonna get stirred and possibly outperform bitcoin. BSV is now selling at bargain prices way cheaper than bulgarian cabbage, then its no wonder why ppl have this much spare cash to invest in aggressive marketing.
The only thing this image demonstrates is the depths to which BSV people will sink to spread misinformation, and also that they are planning on taking over the BTC logo.
You're going to need to create better fake news than this if you want BSV to go up in price. Maybe release a tweet in Korean about how Craig signed a message from the Genesis Block.
Some lines move up some down
fees?
The capacity for 14,000 people to transact every second (more to come next year)
BSV 14000 tps
Komodo 10000 tps
Xem 4000 tps
Eos 3000 tps
Xrp 1500 tps
BTC 6 tps
BSV is the only legitimate crypto currency.
February 4th 2020 Block size limit drama will be over, the unfuckening complete.
Shitload of patents (near 1000), unlimited blocks on the way and McDonalds interested in utilising BSV, MetaNet, scientific data uploads.......
BSV had a single block that could contain all the blocks produced by BTC in AN ENTIRE DAY.
Let that sink in for a minute.
https://satoshi.io/block-height/593116
BSV 14000 tps
Komodo 10000 tps
Xem 4000 tps
Eos 3000 tps
Xrp 1500 tps
BTC 6 tps
BSV is the only legitimate crypto currency.
February 4th 2020 Block size limit drama will be over, the unfuckening complete.
Shitload of patents (near 1000), unlimited blocks on the way and McDonalds interested in utilising BSV, MetaNet, scientific data uploads.......
BSV had a single block that could contain all the blocks produced by BTC in AN ENTIRE DAY.
Let that sink in for a minute.
https://satoshi.io/block-height/593116
A short video on the technical details of increasing the block:
https://youtu.be/GZDjDTRQvmk
https://youtu.be/GZDjDTRQvmk
Nice. How payment request will work by POP
https://mobile.twitter.com/apagut/status/1155970194658828295
https://mobile.twitter.com/apagut/status/1155970194658828295
BitCoin is better than cash.
It is the backbone for the new secure internet structure
As George Gilder nicely described here
https://youtu.be/cidZRD3NzHg
It is the backbone for the new secure internet structure
As George Gilder nicely described here
https://youtu.be/cidZRD3NzHg
There is way more use in a scalable eCash SYSTEM
Allowing huge blocks is a good idea if you want to store large amounts of data, like weather stats or whatever.
But you know what else is good for storing data? A regular hard drive.
You don't need a blockchain to store weather data, which is what makes up the majority of SV blocks.
Dont worry there is huge amount of scientific data store and share.
There is way more use in a scalable eCash SYSTEM
Allowing huge blocks is a good idea if you want to store large amounts of data, like weather stats or whatever.
But you know what else is good for storing data? A regular hard drive.
You don't need a blockchain to store weather data, which is what makes up the majority of SV blocks.
Thx for telling that. Sure there should be all sorts of audit and contract, settlement (my last post for that got deleted again...) data hashed into the blockchain. Scientific work and other IP like code timestamped ... but time will tell where to start. For now someone decided to try weather .
The internet is open
Another leap forward, 248MB block on Mainnet!
Nothing else comes close
Before already a 236.67 MB block
https://satoshi.io/block-height/593116
Whats that 4 days of BTC confirming time?
Quick lets find the defibrillator the orange line is flat-lining, red one is pumping nice.
Nothing else comes close
Before already a 236.67 MB block
https://satoshi.io/block-height/593116
Whats that 4 days of BTC confirming time?
Quick lets find the defibrillator the orange line is flat-lining, red one is pumping nice.
"Bitcoin, an electronic peer to peer cash system". Remember ?
Your gigameg wanabee block: less than 2.5M USD of value (2,489,450)
Bitcoin blocks:
587487 5,760,800.00
587486 24,705,600.00
587485 21,488,700.00
587484 10,788,500.00
587483 22,153,900.00
587482 73,447,300.00
587481 90,123,300.00
587480 42,493,200.00
587479 8,834,990.00
Biggest block size of these above ? 1,478MB (obviously block 587481)
So:
- BSV: 2,489,450USD for 248MB.
- Bitcoin: 90,123,300USD for 1.478MB.
BSV block size is almost 168 times bigger for 36 times less value than Bitcoin
Bitcoin is 6000X more efficient to transfer value / money.
Keep your gigameg blocks.
There is way more use in a scalable eCash SYSTEM
https://Twitter.com/andrew_boho/status/1155120166856024069
Another leap forward, 248MB block on Mainnet!
Nothing else comes close
Before already a 236.67 MB block
https://satoshi.io/block-height/593116
Whats that 4 days of BTC confirming time?
Quick lets find the defibrillator the orange line is flat-lining, red one is pumping nice.
Nothing else comes close
Before already a 236.67 MB block
https://satoshi.io/block-height/593116
Whats that 4 days of BTC confirming time?
Quick lets find the defibrillator the orange line is flat-lining, red one is pumping nice.
Hashrate +30% today
Nice reading about the return of op_return
https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/07/27/the-return-of-op_return-roadmap-to-genesis-part-4/
For push data use op_pd
https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/07/27/the-return-of-op_return-roadmap-to-genesis-part-4/
For push data use op_pd
https://www.yours.org/content/the-wonder-and-curiosity-that-is-cityonchain-6b0b20a1beba/#comments
Sooner, rater then later no-coiners will have no say
Twetch or https://cityonchain.com/hotRoom ....... (like digital yellow pages or craigs list on chain)
In other news, a Bitcoin Core Lightining User
Sooner, rater then later no-coiners will have no say
Twetch or https://cityonchain.com/hotRoom ....... (like digital yellow pages or craigs list on chain)
In other news, a Bitcoin Core Lightining User
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-sv/charts/hashrate-distribution
CoinGeek - 29%
svpool.com - 13%
Mempool.com - 11%
3 pools, 53%
So... ::bzzzt!:: wrong! Again.
Today, tut, Today. Do try to keep up.
So... ::bzzzt!:: wrong! Again.
More telling, however, is your lack of response to the following:
# of pools required to make over 50% on BTC today: 3 - BTC.com 28.47%, F2Pool 13.19%, Poolin 11.81%
Kinda belies the absurdity of your 'bubut muh BSV mining centralization as compared to BTC', amirite?
Get your facts straight. Right now 4 pools are enough (do the live calculation) on BSV.
My facts are straight. As I said from the outset: "Today".
'Right now' is instantaneous. 24 hours is closer to instantaneous than 7 days. But fine, let's go with your figures for shits'n'giggles.
Quote
Last 7 days:
https://sv.coin.dance/blocks/thisweek
BSV: 3 pools represent in total 50% or more HR.
https://coin.dance/blocks/thisweek
Bitcoin: 4 pools represent in total 50% or more HR.
https://sv.coin.dance/blocks/thisweek
BSV: 3 pools represent in total 50% or more HR.
https://coin.dance/blocks/thisweek
Bitcoin: 4 pools represent in total 50% or more HR.
So your point would seem to boil down to: 3 miners is certain death by centralization, while 4 miners is no risk whatsoever.
Quote
My point is valid.
Riiiight.
It is Bitcoin - but not ur BTC (what is altered SegwitCoin)
Never will be: centralized,
False.
Quote
unsustainable,
While unknowable a priori, that is quite unlikely.
Quote
average Joe can't run a full node
False.
Quote
so it's very unBitcoin.
Well, you're batting zero for three in your stated criteria. So... ::bzzzt!:: wrong! It's the most Bitcoiniest of the Bitcoins. At least from the standpoint of the design of the protocol itself. The only legitimate claim BTC/Segwit/Core has on the title is popularity. Which can be fleeting.
Few mining pools, few nodes and less and less. It's centralizing, that's a fact.
Average Joe won't spend 1600usd (HDDs only) to run a full node
As long as there are no structural barriers for new entrants to the space of non-mining, fully-validating clients (i.e., what you so blithely mis-refer to as 'full nodes'), the network is exactly as decentralized as it need be. It's not as if having lots of non-mining, fully-validating clients actually provides any benefit to the network at large.
As far as mining:
# of pools required to make over 50% on BTC today: 3 - BTC.com 28.47%, F2Pool 13.19%, Poolin 11.81%
# of pools required to make over 50% on BSV today: 5 - Coingeek 27.08%, Mempool 11.81%, SVPool 6.25%, Dpool 4.17%, BMG Pool 3.47%
So... ::bzzzt!:: wrong! Again.
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-sv/charts/hashrate-distribution
CoinGeek - 29%
svpool.com - 13%
Mempool.com - 11%
3 pools, 53%
So... ::bzzzt!:: wrong! Again.
Today, tut, Today. Do try to keep up.
So... ::bzzzt!:: wrong! Again.
More telling, however, is your lack of response to the following:
# of pools required to make over 50% on BTC today: 3 - BTC.com 28.47%, F2Pool 13.19%, Poolin 11.81%
Kinda belies the absurdity of your 'bubut muh BSV mining centralization as compared to BTC', amirite?
It is Bitcoin - but not ur BTC (what is altered SegwitCoin)
Never will be: centralized,
False.
Quote
unsustainable,
While unknowable a priori, that is quite unlikely.
Quote
average Joe can't run a full node
False.
Quote
so it's very unBitcoin.
Well, you're batting zero for three in your stated criteria. So... ::bzzzt!:: wrong! It's the most Bitcoiniest of the Bitcoins. At least from the standpoint of the design of the protocol itself. The only legitimate claim BTC/Segwit/Core has on the title is popularity. Which can be fleeting.
Few mining pools, few nodes and less and less. It's centralizing, that's a fact.
Average Joe won't spend 1600usd (HDDs only) to run a full node
As long as there are no structural barriers for new entrants to the space of non-mining, fully-validating clients (i.e., what you so blithely mis-refer to as 'full nodes'), the network is exactly as decentralized as it need be. It's not as if having lots of non-mining, fully-validating clients actually provides any benefit to the network at large.
As far as mining:
# of pools required to make over 50% on BTC today: 3 - BTC.com 28.47%, F2Pool 13.19%, Poolin 11.81%
# of pools required to make over 50% on BSV today: 5 - Coingeek 27.08%, Mempool 11.81%, SVPool 6.25%, Dpool 4.17%, BMG Pool 3.47%
So... ::bzzzt!:: wrong! Again.
Jump to: