Author

Topic: [ANN] [BTCP] BitcoinPrivate: A Truly Private Bitcoin [Equihash] - page 131. (Read 117372 times)

jr. member
Activity: 60
Merit: 2
The price on Bittrex is amazing. It goes to show how Bittrex trades are fake bots. How the hell would buy at 3x the price of all other exchanges.

But I personally think the sell of on ZCL had no reason and the price could go back up to at least $80.

BTCP when starts trading could start at $200. Will see where it goes from there but if you ask me its at least worth as much as half of BCH or $600 so if starts trading at $200 it could run up after that.

If I remember correctly development for ZCL will stop completely. I doubt the price will go up again. Or has there someone been found now to continue the dev work?
Yes, it will stop.
But the market sometimes is quite a funny thing, and stopped development might sometimes be better than continued but screwed up.
ZCL is a good foundation, without greedy lines of code of Zcash and Zencash. And it can survive as a starting point of some privacy hardforks and one of the "default" coin. It was pumped and dumped, nothing new or unusual.
member
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
there is no btcp wallet yet ?
looks like yes, and that`s weird
someone posted a link to a pool which refers to a paper wallet but not from official BTCP website, so i would be very careful with that
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
there is no btcp wallet yet ?
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
The price on Bittrex is amazing. It goes to show how Bittrex trades are fake bots. How the hell would buy at 3x the price of all other exchanges.

But I personally think the sell of on ZCL had no reason and the price could go back up to at least $80.

BTCP when starts trading could start at $200. Will see where it goes from there but if you ask me its at least worth as much as half of BCH or $600 so if starts trading at $200 it could run up after that.

If I remember correctly development for ZCL will stop completely. I doubt the price will go up again. Or has there someone been found now to continue the dev work?
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 250
I didn't read whitepaper but can understand this so called privacy coin will be mixed or cloned from other coins. It is failed fork but good for Bitcoin community because these forks are loosing all the attraction so quickly one couldn't imagine to happen. There will be race among dumpers to get rid of these coins once the opportunity is given.
sr. member
Activity: 463
Merit: 250
The development team should update the thread with the exact time the main net mining goes live, or at least tell us that they plan on releasing the mining start time. Otherwise this gives a mining advantage to whomever knows the exact launch time.

Sure, “a couple of days” after the snapshot is fine when updating on final QA but they should elaborate on this exactly when things are ready, then give a definitive time (preferably at least a few hours) for the main net launch so all the miners can start the race at the same time. I know suprnova usually switches from test to main automatically which is a solution for some but does not address the core issue.

Unless there is another valid reason for this such as avoiding chain splits or 51% attacks?



I agree exact date is needed - not fair and dangerous otherwise.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
just dead
before snapshot  Grin
member
Activity: 197
Merit: 11
Dead On Snapshot?

 Roll Eyes
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
The development team should update the thread with the exact time the main net mining goes live, or at least tell us that they plan on releasing the mining start time. Otherwise this gives a mining advantage to whomever knows the exact launch time.

Sure, “a couple of days” after the snapshot is fine when updating on final QA but they should elaborate on this exactly when things are ready, then give a definitive time (preferably at least a few hours) for the main net launch so all the miners can start the race at the same time. I know suprnova usually switches from test to main automatically which is a solution for some but does not address the core issue.

Unless there is another valid reason for this such as avoiding chain splits or 51% attacks?

legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1001
At the moment discussions are going about the extreme changes in value of Zclassic are going on while the market is off for BTCP. After mainnet releases it will be up wherever be. It will be interesting to see if Bittrex opens its trades or not as in past they said no to BTG but later on they opened. It is matter of hours when things will start to be clear.
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 100
They promise to mix bitcoin and the technology of anonymity of payments SCES, the new coin will be very promising.
newbie
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
Can you really be that ignorant? It is not the ZCL wallet that cannot handle the pressure. It's the exchanges wallet and their infrastructure behind that (databases and backend i.e.). Exchange wallets confirm withdraws and deposits differently than normal wallet to wallet transfer.. This issue has nothing to do with the coin infrastructure or private wallet.

Yeah, they have few hundred coins with more volume who are working without problem
Conspiracy against Zclassic ahah you are right

You really are one ignorant human being. Please go and educate yourself before posting.
If you cannot understand what you read, well that is your problem. ZCL is not the first and not the last coin that will have EXCHANGE end issues. This is similar scenario to what happened with LTC and Doge markets in Cryptopia. I'll just leave it here, tired of people who cannot use their brains.

Everything you need to know about these technical issues can be found here:
https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/News
https://www.coinbureau.com/news/bitcoin-private-fork-facing-zclassic-withdrawal-issues-exchanges/

For you, genius :
https://support.bittrex.com/hc/en-us/articles/360001271272
Quote
Additional technical notes:

The upstream project Zcash does not have these wallet issues as we worked closely with their team to implement the following changes:

Zcash GitHub issue 2446 - Add field indicating coinbase tx in output of listunspent

Zcash GitHub issue 2448 - Add an RPC function or flag to create a shielding transaction that only contains coinbase

The Zclassic codebase is behind the upstream Zcash codebase so it does not have these changes implemented. We have requested that the Zclassic team test and implement these changes ASAP.

Tell me it's infrastructures behind Bittrex or Cryptopia now.


It is exchange issue. They use Z wallet in a wrong manner. They skip a few steps as many other wallets work differently. Every new coin should go Z (private) first. Please don't try to be some master developer as you were a mere bounty hunter for BTCP team, if even that.
https://github.com/zcash/zcash/issues/2449

"Zcash has a consensus rule that coinbase UTXOs must be shielded. This causes problems for e.g. exchanges using the Bitcoin-inherited RPCs, where they run into errors. As the only way coinbase can be spent is via z_sendmany, it should never be considered for transparent RPCs.

We should modify the transparent coin selection rules used by the inherited transparent RPCs to exclude coinbase. One usability issue is that mining users might get confused if they can't spend everything they appear to have; we should ensure that if users try to spend more than can be funded without coinbase, but could be funded with coinbase, that they still receive an appropriate error."

#2448 - Miners sending NEWLY mined coins to an exchange, these should always go Z first then T. Educate yourself on how Zcoins work, before you come howling here. It is not Zclassic wallet issue, but purely exchange wallet issue as they only give public addresses to people.

"Requested by an exchange. If a miner is sending their mining rewards to an address, and they happen to receive a coinbase output instead of a regular mining payout, then it becomes almost impossible to send transactions from that address until the coinbase output has been shielded. But the Bitcoin-inherited RPCs make it very expensive (in terms of RPC time) to figure out which UTXOs are from coinbase."
newbie
Activity: 108
Merit: 0
when i can mine BTCP?
member
Activity: 630
Merit: 10
In BTCz we trust. Organic slow growth.
The price on Bittrex is amazing. It goes to show how Bittrex trades are fake bots. How the hell would buy at 3x the price of all other exchanges.

But I personally think the sell of on ZCL had no reason and the price could go back up to at least $80.

BTCP when starts trading could start at $200. Will see where it goes from there but if you ask me its at least worth as much as half of BCH or $600 so if starts trading at $200 it could run up after that.
member
Activity: 630
Merit: 10
In BTCz we trust. Organic slow growth.
The lack of activity in this thread is stunning. Is everyone on Discord or something?
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Can you really be that ignorant? It is not the ZCL wallet that cannot handle the pressure. It's the exchanges wallet and their infrastructure behind that (databases and backend i.e.). Exchange wallets confirm withdraws and deposits differently than normal wallet to wallet transfer.. This issue has nothing to do with the coin infrastructure or private wallet.

Yeah, they have few hundred coins with more volume who are working without problem
Conspiracy against Zclassic ahah you are right

You really are one ignorant human being. Please go and educate yourself before posting.
If you cannot understand what you read, well that is your problem. ZCL is not the first and not the last coin that will have EXCHANGE end issues. This is similar scenario to what happened with LTC and Doge markets in Cryptopia. I'll just leave it here, tired of people who cannot use their brains.

Everything you need to know about these technical issues can be found here:
https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/News
https://www.coinbureau.com/news/bitcoin-private-fork-facing-zclassic-withdrawal-issues-exchanges/

For you, genius :
https://support.bittrex.com/hc/en-us/articles/360001271272
Quote
Additional technical notes:

The upstream project Zcash does not have these wallet issues as we worked closely with their team to implement the following changes:

Zcash GitHub issue 2446 - Add field indicating coinbase tx in output of listunspent

Zcash GitHub issue 2448 - Add an RPC function or flag to create a shielding transaction that only contains coinbase

The Zclassic codebase is behind the upstream Zcash codebase so it does not have these changes implemented. We have requested that the Zclassic team test and implement these changes ASAP.

Tell me it's infrastructures behind Bittrex or Cryptopia now.
hero member
Activity: 1848
Merit: 640
*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*
So, the spork is possible.

Somebody please make LTCP with ZCL as a donor.

ZCL will be like ETC :-D oooh weee

===>

 https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange/?market=ZCL_BTC
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1068
Juicin' crypto
OH LOOK ANOTHER BTC SHITCOIN EDITION.

garbage
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
Bittrex did a bad move today, I've lost a lot of btc, even the wallet is offline, I think it's time to move to another exchange
Jump to: