From being a miner and holder of CAT a month after it was launched, I too have notice the sharp divide amongst those in the community that were either looking for CatCoin to be successful, or just profitable to mine. And while yes, it would be great to have a coin that's profitable to mine, that's counter to having LONG TERM successful coin.
CatCoin was one of the first coins I became really involved in, and is one of the few that is still around a year later. Though I have only been involved in crypto for a year, there has one thing that I have noticed to be true. If a coin looks to be successful for the long term, then looking at the short term, or even medium term outcomes is completely POINTLESS!
Yes, we have had our troubles with the diff re-targeting code when we were getting slammed by some multipools, in the past, but I think most, if not all, multipools are either ignoring us or have taken us out of their pools entirely.
I have been quiet and netual on this, but I feel that it's time I speak up. The last thing we need right now is for people like Hozer and etblvu1, who have been either FUD'ing or trying to take over CAT, to continue to do so. They need to sit down, shut up, and let the Dev team do their thing.
Hozer almost had me running his rouge code on my P2Pool node, as he took me by surprise telling me that there was a new version of the wallet out, and I needed to update. Luckly for me, I didn't take the bait, but almost did. It was only after re-reading the dev channel log, seeing no mention of new release, or on here, that I saw that I shouldn't "upgrade" and didn't.
As for the logo, I still like our original one better, but just my two cents.
CatCoin was one of the first coins I became really involved in, and is one of the few that is still around a year later. Though I have only been involved in crypto for a year, there has one thing that I have noticed to be true. If a coin looks to be successful for the long term, then looking at the short term, or even medium term outcomes is completely POINTLESS!
Yes, we have had our troubles with the diff re-targeting code when we were getting slammed by some multipools, in the past, but I think most, if not all, multipools are either ignoring us or have taken us out of their pools entirely.
I have been quiet and netual on this, but I feel that it's time I speak up. The last thing we need right now is for people like Hozer and etblvu1, who have been either FUD'ing or trying to take over CAT, to continue to do so. They need to sit down, shut up, and let the Dev team do their thing.
Hozer almost had me running his rouge code on my P2Pool node, as he took me by surprise telling me that there was a new version of the wallet out, and I needed to update. Luckly for me, I didn't take the bait, but almost did. It was only after re-reading the dev channel log, seeing no mention of new release, or on here, that I saw that I shouldn't "upgrade" and didn't.
As for the logo, I still like our original one better, but just my two cents.
Seriously. I asked you to run some code to fix a network problem because I was the only one actually writing code. And when it became clear that people actually gave a shit, I made it quite clear how to fix the problems.
Hozer - you continue to lie about how many people are writing code (three - blak, zero, and you. Except that while blak and zero were working FOR Cat, you were finding ways to reject legitimate blocks and write code to block coin holders so they can't use their coins) and you continue to lie about people "giving a shit". The COMMUNITY never left - but you betrayed them. CAT's alive in SPITE OF YOU, not because of you.I hear a lot about 'the dev team', but all I see is marketing. If the dev team had some code updates, either of removing the 30 second minimum, or just provide *some* sign of life, I'd happily shut up.
While I doubt you actually would "shut up", we pushed code changes to the release Git 3 months ago to remove your seed nodes. ALL of the rest of your bastardized code - including the 30 second minimum block time - has been removed from the testnet code. The testnet code is the baseline for all release candidates. Marketing? The single best round of 'marketing' the team undertook was to fire you. That single act brought new miners and new blood to the process. Why? Because as we discussed on the telephone, via email, in - dev, and in personal chat: When the dev team appears to be CENSORING LEGITIMATE MINERS it PUSHES MINERS AWAY. If you care about Cat, Hozer, you'll stay away.
The history of this coin is it gets taken over by new developers when the old developers fail to maintain it. So instead of FUD, how about the dev team maintain the damned thing, and try to take constructive criticism. Otherwise if we think cat has been abandoned, *again*, we'll take it over, *again*.
I cannot say that the dev team will look the same next year as it does today, but I can and will say that the last time this coin was abandoned was the last time this coin project will be abandoned.You've heard it from the dev team and the community: You're still fired. Find another playground, Hozer. We don't need your code, your pool nodes, your sites, or your continued FUD/lies/threats/BS.
Andy
