Topic: [ANN] CDN:Canada eCoin-merge mineable scrypt eCoin [ANN] - page 7. (Read 42424 times)
Yes if a fork is needed it should be planned out and put into action. Merge mining coins need the maintain compatibility among the others.
its something you should be doing.
I think Shapeshift is ok and very useful and we should try to get listed there but we need first more exchanges.
Why dont we make a voting to decide in which exchange we focus first?
I propose the next 3 exchanges in this order (please include your exchanges and reasons)
1) Yobit (easy to get listed/no need to vote/ no delisting)
2) Cryptsy (hard to get listed/no delisting)
3) Shapeshift (hard to get listed/no delisting)
I donate 0.02btc to Yobit's
Only 0.08btc left 
PS: Support my ticket asking coinmarketcap.com to update their info to include
https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange?market=CDN_BTC
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13201438
Why dont we make a voting to decide in which exchange we focus first?
I propose the next 3 exchanges in this order (please include your exchanges and reasons)
1) Yobit (easy to get listed/no need to vote/ no delisting)
2) Cryptsy (hard to get listed/no delisting)
3) Shapeshift (hard to get listed/no delisting)
I donate 0.02btc to Yobit's
Only 0.08btc left PS: Support my ticket asking coinmarketcap.com to update their info to include
https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange?market=CDN_BTC
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13201438
I am completely new to Yobit, I haven't been able to find where I add my BTC donation. Is there a link you could give me to top up your donation to 0.1btc ?
Also, by the looks of it - in order change the chainID we will need to do a fork - not sure if its something we should be doing; what do you guys think?
/koad
koad, you shitcoin disturbin hoser !
Why did you edit my quote ?
I am not a supporter of this easy, insta, premined shitcoin. Delete that quote immediately.
This shit is getting serious.
Why did you edit my quote ?
I am not a supporter of this easy, insta, premined shitcoin. Delete that quote immediately.
I like this coin, any developments as of late?
whats the global plan for this coin?
whats the global plan for this coin?
This shit is getting serious.
Hey there Hippie Tech,
I didn't edit your post, in the future I'll stay away from your posts.
you said 'This shit is getting serious.
', didn't you?I'm not even going to check because I don't care, if I did it was a mistake. Your attitude is what is shit.
/koad
AIB(coin) is supporting CDN merge hashing power around 100M - 5G dynamically.
And holding the CDN not dumping a single dime yet:)
wish the community support more Canadian Blockchain developers.
If you want to supporting me a little bit.
welcome to donate a few BTC.
0.01 are welcome
my nicehash wallet:
32JD2r4PjLVDQiP8nQ8yetjUYM74H9e1Fk
And holding the CDN not dumping a single dime yet:)
wish the community support more Canadian Blockchain developers.
If you want to supporting me a little bit.
welcome to donate a few BTC.
0.01 are welcome
my nicehash wallet:
32JD2r4PjLVDQiP8nQ8yetjUYM74H9e1Fk
I have problems when I enable CDN when I already have syscoin. is this being worked on? It seem they are using the same chain ID or something?
I am looking into the impacts of changing the chain id, i don't see any red flags yet but I need to be sure. If this could cause problems then we will need to gain consensus in the matter.
P.S. if you know of any useful links on the subject please reply here - looking for the implications in changing chain id (aux pow).
/koad
I'll see what I can find out from another dev that has a lot of experience working with merged coins.
Thanks
I would check into this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769073.new#new
and ping ahmed_bodi he's quite an excellent dev.
But from what I can find out, changing the ID shouldn't have much ill affect and it would only really be required for pool ops merging with other coins.
Thanks for the info; that is the list I was looking for
I haven't found much evidence that harm would be done, but am not 100% sure yet. I will change the ID to 1867 which is Canada's birth year and do a complete download/resync of the chain using the modified version to make sure all is OK. The assumption here is that if a rescan is possible then we can be secure in a full network update without any harmful implications.
What does everyone think of this plan?
P.S. 1867 is also the amount of years ( after the next ice age ) before the Leafs win another cup.
/koad
That's great news koad, hopefully everything goes well.
Regarding MYR: I think their problem was that they had the right chainid in place but the rpc reported back chainid 0 when getauxblock was called, IIRC it was this commit that has fixed the problem: https://github.com/myriadteam/myriadcoin/commit/e0a30bf8f7ee533c004040c85369cf457f12d36f
Good luck with your test, looking forward to merge-mine a few CDN
I have problems when I enable CDN when I already have syscoin. is this being worked on? It seem they are using the same chain ID or something?
I am looking into the impacts of changing the chain id, i don't see any red flags yet but I need to be sure. If this could cause problems then we will need to gain consensus in the matter.
P.S. if you know of any useful links on the subject please reply here - looking for the implications in changing chain id (aux pow).
/koad
I'll see what I can find out from another dev that has a lot of experience working with merged coins.
Thanks
I would check into this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769073.new#new
and ping ahmed_bodi he's quite an excellent dev.
But from what I can find out, changing the ID shouldn't have much ill affect and it would only really be required for pool ops merging with other coins.
Thanks for the info; that is the list I was looking for
I haven't found much evidence that harm would be done, but am not 100% sure yet. I will change the ID to 1867 which is Canada's birth year and do a complete download/resync of the chain using the modified version to make sure all is OK. The assumption here is that if a rescan is possible then we can be secure in a full network update without any harmful implications.
What does everyone think of this plan?
P.S. 1867 is also the amount of years ( after the next ice age ) before the Leafs win another cup.
/koad
I'm game for that. I was tryin to find some reference in the MYR thread as I believe they initially had the same issue and simply issued an update that was only needed for pool ops that were merge mining. Normal users could simply use the existing wallet...
But the leafs better win sometime in my lifetime!
I have problems when I enable CDN when I already have syscoin. is this being worked on? It seem they are using the same chain ID or something?
I am looking into the impacts of changing the chain id, i don't see any red flags yet but I need to be sure. If this could cause problems then we will need to gain consensus in the matter.
P.S. if you know of any useful links on the subject please reply here - looking for the implications in changing chain id (aux pow).
/koad
I'll see what I can find out from another dev that has a lot of experience working with merged coins.
Thanks
I would check into this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769073.new#new
and ping ahmed_bodi he's quite an excellent dev.
But from what I can find out, changing the ID shouldn't have much ill affect and it would only really be required for pool ops merging with other coins.
Thanks for the info; that is the list I was looking for
I haven't found much evidence that harm would be done, but am not 100% sure yet. I will change the ID to 1867 which is Canada's birth year and do a complete download/resync of the chain using the modified version to make sure all is OK. The assumption here is that if a rescan is possible then we can be secure in a full network update without any harmful implications.
What does everyone think of this plan?
P.S. 1867 is also the amount of years ( after the next ice age ) before the Leafs win another cup.
/koad
I have problems when I enable CDN when I already have syscoin. is this being worked on? It seem they are using the same chain ID or something?
I am looking into the impacts of changing the chain id, i don't see any red flags yet but I need to be sure. If this could cause problems then we will need to gain consensus in the matter.
P.S. if you know of any useful links on the subject please reply here - looking for the implications in changing chain id (aux pow).
/koad
I'll see what I can find out from another dev that has a lot of experience working with merged coins.
Thanks
I would check into this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769073.new#new
and ping ahmed_bodi he's quite an excellent dev.
But from what I can find out, changing the ID shouldn't have much ill affect and it would only really be required for pool ops merging with other coins.
I have problems when I enable CDN when I already have syscoin. is this being worked on? It seem they are using the same chain ID or something?
I am looking into the impacts of changing the chain id, i don't see any red flags yet but I need to be sure. If this could cause problems then we will need to gain consensus in the matter.
P.S. if you know of any useful links on the subject please reply here - looking for the implications in changing chain id (aux pow).
/koad
I'll see what I can find out from another dev that has a lot of experience working with merged coins.
Thanks
I have problems when I enable CDN when I already have syscoin. is this being worked on? It seem they are using the same chain ID or something?
I am looking into the impacts of changing the chain id, i don't see any red flags yet but I need to be sure. If this could cause problems then we will need to gain consensus in the matter.
P.S. if you know of any useful links on the subject please reply here - looking for the implications in changing chain id (aux pow).
/koad
I have problems when I enable CDN when I already have syscoin. is this being worked on? It seem they are using the same chain ID or something?
Is anyone else successfully merge mining this?
I have problems when I enable CDN when I already have syscoin. is this being worked on? It seem they are using the same chain ID or something?
Is anyone else successfully merge mining this?
I think Shapeshift is ok and very useful and we should try to get listed there but we need first more exchanges.
Why dont we make a voting to decide in which exchange we focus first?
I propose the next 3 exchanges in this order (please include your exchanges and reasons)
1) Yobit (easy to get listed/no need to vote/ no delisting)
2) Cryptsy (hard to get listed/no delisting)
3) Shapeshift (hard to get listed/no delisting)
I donate 0.02btc to Yobit's Only 0.08btc left
PS: Support my ticket asking coinmarketcap.com to update their info to include
https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange?market=CDN_BTC
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13201438
Why dont we make a voting to decide in which exchange we focus first?
I propose the next 3 exchanges in this order (please include your exchanges and reasons)
1) Yobit (easy to get listed/no need to vote/ no delisting)
2) Cryptsy (hard to get listed/no delisting)
3) Shapeshift (hard to get listed/no delisting)
I donate 0.02btc to Yobit's
Only 0.08btc left PS: Support my ticket asking coinmarketcap.com to update their info to include
https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange?market=CDN_BTC
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13201438
I would be extra cautious on getting CDN the new exchanges and learn from the past
Xnigma, Coin-Swap, SWISSCEX, COMKORT -> all gone now and perhaps many coins along with them.
I would vote for shapeshift.io -> no login required , easy to use and full integration with android coinomi wallet
what next ? -> polo? , bittrex? -> is ok as long as we have right volume on it .
btw nice to see some positive energy here \(סּںסּَ` )/ۜ
/hexdump
Xnigma, Coin-Swap, SWISSCEX, COMKORT -> all gone now and perhaps many coins along with them.
I would vote for shapeshift.io -> no login required , easy to use and full integration with android coinomi wallet
what next ? -> polo? , bittrex? -> is ok as long as we have right volume on it .
btw nice to see some positive energy here \(סּںסּَ` )/ۜ
/hexdump
With all this activity going on
I would like to point out that we only have 1 exchange and now we are all here I would like to suggest to get Canada eCoin into a new exchange.
This are the exchange we have available and how much would it cost to get listed:
Quote
Yobit ***:
2 ways
1) 0 btc it's not sure you get listed
2) 0.1 btc you get listed in 2 days
C-cex ***: (You get easily delisted)
1 way
Paid votes + Community votes (for 0.15 btc or 150 community votes)
Cryptopia *:
2 ways
1) DOT votes (paid votes) (not less than 0.1 btc to get listed)
2) Community votes
(as you can imagine we cannot get into Cryptsy/Bittrex cos we couldnt get enought votes
)
2 ways
1) 0 btc it's not sure you get listed
2) 0.1 btc you get listed in 2 days
C-cex ***: (You get easily delisted)
1 way
Paid votes + Community votes (for 0.15 btc or 150 community votes)
Cryptopia *:
2 ways
1) DOT votes (paid votes) (not less than 0.1 btc to get listed)
2) Community votes
(as you can imagine we cannot get into Cryptsy/Bittrex cos we couldnt get enought votes
) I suggest to get listed in Yobit.
Why?
*** "High" volume (between the Tier 2 Exchanges)
You dont get delisted
If we donate 0.02btc each, it's done
If you dont like to donate, we can try to get listed in Cryptopia or C-cex
Opinions??
I wouldnt mind getting onto all the exchanges. We do have a listing on cryptopia, ->> https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange?market=CDN_BTC
I will pitch in to donate to get onto others, I seen that cryptsy.ca took users money and gave them nothing in return (check out the chat box, its loaded with unhappy users) so I don't do cryptsy anymore, seems like a gox coming on. I would like to see the Canada eCoin on poloniex and bittrex; not sure how to go about that tho.
/koad
With all this activity going on
I would like to point out that we only have 1 exchange and now we are all here I would like to suggest to get Canada eCoin into a new exchange.
This are the exchange we have available and how much would it cost to get listed:
Quote
Yobit ***:
2 ways
1) 0 btc it's not sure you get listed
2) 0.1 btc you get listed in 2 days
C-cex ***: (You get easily delisted)
1 way
Paid votes + Community votes (for 0.15 btc or 150 community votes)
Cryptopia *:
2 ways
1) DOT votes (paid votes) (not less than 0.1 btc to get listed)
2) Community votes
(as you can imagine we cannot get into Cryptsy/Bittrex cos we couldnt get enought votes )
2 ways
1) 0 btc it's not sure you get listed
2) 0.1 btc you get listed in 2 days
C-cex ***: (You get easily delisted)
1 way
Paid votes + Community votes (for 0.15 btc or 150 community votes)
Cryptopia *:
2 ways
1) DOT votes (paid votes) (not less than 0.1 btc to get listed)
2) Community votes
(as you can imagine we cannot get into Cryptsy/Bittrex cos we couldnt get enought votes
) I suggest to get listed in Yobit.
Why?
*** "High" volume (between the Tier 2 Exchanges)
You dont get delisted
If we donate 0.02btc each, it's done
If you dont like to donate, we can try to get listed in Cryptopia or C-cex
Opinions??
Are there any plans to change the chainid from 1 to something unique, so that CDN can be merge-mined together with other auxpow coins like SYS?
Not officially, but definitely something i'll look into. Do you know of a common/updated list of used IDs?/koad
Thank you for your reply.
Not directly, but I can give you the chainids I know of:
SYS: 1
SJW: 24
GRN: 25
PTC: 71
VIA: 86
DOGE: 98
ULTC: 13804
HTH
Are there any plans to change the chainid from 1 to something unique, so that CDN can be merge-mined together with other auxpow coins like SYS?
Not officially, but definitely something i'll look into. Do you know of a common/updated list of used IDs?
/koad
As marketcap are 95 BTC on coimarketcap yet, I would listen more reviews before of mark it as RIP.
Are there any plans to change the chainid from 1 to something unique, so that CDN can be merge-mined together with other auxpow coins like SYS?
Jump to: