I've been very down on CINNI (mostly its market performance), but this coin has at least one thing - and it is a very big thing - going for it: it's untainted by DRK/XC/CLOAK/CRYPT-type nonsense and skepticism, including skepticism that its new anon features arent decentralised/trustless and wont work.
The anon concepts/tech of XC, DRK, CLOAK, CRYPT, etc -- whatever their merits/demerits (I cant even keep pace since the concepts/specs keep changing) -- are subject to constant change/uncertainty. For the most part, it looks like they're being put together very haphazardly and are repeatedly exposed as being inadequate/imperfect. One gets the impression, going through these other message threads, of ever growing, ever-more-complicated Rude Goldberg machines, barely kept together with bubble gum and tin foil, being put together under market duress and on the fly -- and still inadequate to the task.
It's a credit to CINNI that its new features have not been introduced in the sloppy, half-assed fashion in which so many other coins have announced their anon features, "whitepapers" and all. I have not read or heard one negative thing said about CINNI's recently released encrypted messaging aspect. I'm not all that excited about it, but that tells me you've delivered on a big new feature you promised, unlike so many others.
If this turns out to be the case of the forthcoming (bigger) anon-transfer tech feature as well, CINNI should presumably stand out just by virtue of being clean, not being slapped together sloppily and not being subject to unending uncertainty and drama.
Just deliver on what you've promised, guys. That alone would set you apart from this swamp.
And, if you can't, nothing will save this coin from oblivion.
impressive
