Thumbs up zing... threecats can't read...
Not once did I resort to ad hominem attacks. The issue is that you feel you're owed an explanation when you're not. They can explain the flaw if and when they feel like it. If they do, I'm sure they'll issue a statement and update. I'd like to know what it is also, but I'm not pestering this board for an answer nor am I speculating that this unknown is or will contribute to a downfall in price. That's the "U" in FUD.
Where we differ is this: I believe that when one coin makes an assertion serious as this - that there may be a flaw affecting other coins - an clear and coherent explanation is owed. Not to me personally but to the communities affected by this assertion, the communities of all coins involved.
This is a simple matter of ethics, of reasonable ethical conduct.
Ethics? You are a daytrader. What the hell do you care about "ethics". You make your "profit" and move on to the next. Your goal is not about ethics. It's about profit.
"Ethics"... lol