Author

Topic: [ANN] [CLOAK] Cloakcoin | No Premine | X13 | Decentralized Market and PoSA - page 663. (Read 1266574 times)

newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
BC released blackhalo trading decentralized platform beta today, can go download it on their thread (uses bitmessage too).  Hasnt effected market price yet. Played around with it little, interface needs to be little more user friendly. But in end i like how fees/escrows benefit cloak stakers as described in here, overall more cloak centralized marketplace which brings value back to us coinholders/investors.

btw cloak is first coin i actually hold, been daytrading for last few months successfully, this coin too promising to sell for daytrade profits Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Im back and read the pages i missed.

I like the WhitePaper Dagger.

I also find the idea somewhat risky though

but i like it
what risk do you see?

buyers and sellers to trade with one another without a governing central point of control.
Oh. True, however I love the idea. I believe the threat of mutual destruction can take over for a central figure. No system is perfect, but I believe the one outlined in the paper is headed to a more ideal solution than paying a percentage to two parties that are just one in disguise( ebay --paypal) whose default action is to place the burden of proof on the seller. I do agree that a secondary forum will become a necessity as an extension of this board.

Which is why it makes me wonder why this isnt a penny stock...

Cloakcoin is or Isn't a penny stock? I'm just confused.. Screw the onemarket, if PoSA works as advertised on launch then hold on for a ride, bc if they can do PoSA then Onemarket is achievable.... a decentralized exchange platform has always been the holy grail....just no one has been able to do it, *cough* fucking emunie

bc has already pulled it off and released theirs today...

If you're referring to blackcoiner.com its just a standard website marketplace, its not decentralized.
full member
Activity: 169
Merit: 100
Im back and read the pages i missed.

I like the WhitePaper Dagger.

I also find the idea somewhat risky though

but i like it
what risk do you see?

buyers and sellers to trade with one another without a governing central point of control.
Oh. True, however I love the idea. I believe the threat of mutual destruction can take over for a central figure. No system is perfect, but I believe the one outlined in the paper is headed to a more ideal solution than paying a percentage to two parties that are just one in disguise( ebay --paypal) whose default action is to place the burden of proof on the seller. I do agree that a secondary forum will become a necessity as an extension of this board.

Which is why it makes me wonder why this isnt a penny stock...

Cloakcoin is or Isn't a penny stock? I'm just confused.. Screw the onemarket, if PoSA works as advertised on launch then hold on for a ride, bc if they can do PoSA then Onemarket is achievable.... a decentralized exchange platform has always been the holy grail....just no one has been able to do it, *cough* fucking emunie

bc has already pulled it off and released theirs today...

still not convinced yet....smells a little like mastercoin or counterparty but I'll wait a bit for my decision
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
I've been doing my own type of marketing. I have been gaming with Cloakcoin as my steam name. Well I'm not sure if it's really marketing, but I hope it draws a few people to Cloak Wink
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Im back and read the pages i missed.

I like the WhitePaper Dagger.

I also find the idea somewhat risky though

but i like it
what risk do you see?

buyers and sellers to trade with one another without a governing central point of control.
Oh. True, however I love the idea. I believe the threat of mutual destruction can take over for a central figure. No system is perfect, but I believe the one outlined in the paper is headed to a more ideal solution than paying a percentage to two parties that are just one in disguise( ebay --paypal) whose default action is to place the burden of proof on the seller. I do agree that a secondary forum will become a necessity as an extension of this board.

Which is why it makes me wonder why this isnt a penny stock...

Cloakcoin is or Isn't a penny stock? I'm just confused.. Screw the onemarket, if PoSA works as advertised on launch then hold on for a ride, bc if they can do PoSA then Onemarket is achievable.... a decentralized exchange platform has always been the holy grail....just no one has been able to do it, *cough* fucking emunie

bc has already pulled it off and released theirs today...
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
Help me please ! I sent CLOAK coins to my wallet at Bittrex, but my wallet cloakcoin can't received coins.

https://bittrex.zendesk.com/attachments/token/PCFCUeEVXOn63PzfLPnNBeNdL/?name=error.GIF

My transaction details:
Status: 395 confirmations
Date: 7/5/2014 02:58
To: Bittrex BxTmSYLcQ6Fx6rscppLYVcbX7okT59tLfu
Debit: -237.483354 CLOAK
Transaction fee: -0.12 CLOAK
Net amount: -237.603354 CLOAK
Transaction ID: 97c06f82d86b4a72c5323ffd755805cb623afca8c41b3b9aee8ce33504e63c15

thanks,
full member
Activity: 382
Merit: 109
I'll throw in for testing PosA
full member
Activity: 169
Merit: 100
Im back and read the pages i missed.

I like the WhitePaper Dagger.

I also find the idea somewhat risky though

but i like it
what risk do you see?

buyers and sellers to trade with one another without a governing central point of control.
Oh. True, however I love the idea. I believe the threat of mutual destruction can take over for a central figure. No system is perfect, but I believe the one outlined in the paper is headed to a more ideal solution than paying a percentage to two parties that are just one in disguise( ebay --paypal) whose default action is to place the burden of proof on the seller. I do agree that a secondary forum will become a necessity as an extension of this board.

Which is why it makes me wonder why this isnt a penny stock...

Cloakcoin is or Isn't a penny stock? I'm just confused.. Screw the onemarket, if PoSA works as advertised on launch then hold on for a ride, bc if they can do PoSA then Onemarket is achievable.... a decentralized exchange platform has always been the holy grail....just no one has been able to do it, *cough* fucking emunie

Edit: I'm not sure of your angle here...Your exit point should be 200k sats and don't look back, I'll take it from there
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
PoSA Update:

Progress is coming along and the Cloak team is right on target.

On launch we want PoSA to work out the box with no glitches.

For that reason we would like to select 10 people from the community to help us in some testnet sessions.

We are updating our testnet daemons for this purpose right now.

The chosen participants will get access on Sunday (at best) or Monday.

A private IRC will be created for the group selected to be our PoSA testers.

We need some heavies because your only job will be to try and hammer it into the ground and break it!

Applicants please send pm and you'll be notified this weekend if you are invited to be a Cloakcoin PoSA tester.






Glad to hear development progress remains on target. I am eager to see the PoSA testnet results!
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Im back and read the pages i missed.

I like the WhitePaper Dagger.

I also find the idea somewhat risky though

but i like it
what risk do you see?

buyers and sellers to trade with one another without a governing central point of control.
Oh. True, however I love the idea. I believe the threat of mutual destruction can take over for a central figure. No system is perfect, but I believe the one outlined in the paper is headed to a more ideal solution than paying a percentage to two parties that are just one in disguise( ebay --paypal) whose default action is to place the burden of proof on the seller. I do agree that a secondary forum will become a necessity as an extension of this board.

Which is why it makes me wonder why this isnt a penny stock...
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Im back and read the pages i missed.

I like the WhitePaper Dagger.

I also find the idea somewhat risky though

but i like it
what risk do you see?

buyers and sellers to trade with one another without a governing central point of control.
Oh. True, however I love the idea. I believe the threat of mutual destruction can take over for a central figure. No system is perfect, but I believe the one outlined in the paper is headed to a more ideal solution than paying a percentage to two parties that are just one in disguise( ebay --paypal) whose default action is to place the burden of proof on the seller. I do agree that a secondary forum will become a necessity as an extension of this board.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Im back and read the pages i missed.

I like the WhitePaper Dagger.

I also find the idea somewhat risky though

but i like it
what risk do you see?

buyers and sellers to trade with one another without a governing central point of control.

I think the contracts could be looked at as a governing POC

I just think its all in the marketing.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Im back and read the pages i missed.

I like the WhitePaper Dagger.

I also find the idea somewhat risky though

but i like it
what risk do you see?

buyers and sellers to trade with one another without a governing central point of control.

I think the contracts could be looked at as a governing POC
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
As a matter of fact the main point of this area is to "announce" an altcoin. I doubt the concept of 2000+ page threads were ever looked at by anyone as effective. Most of you making a call about critical mass just care about the price going up which is a short term goal. Long term this thread will be 2000+ pages with zero organization and alot of valuable topics will be lost in the sea of pages. At that point I doubt you or anyone else will be willing to go through each individual page to catalog key points.

I'm not saying to close this thread.. I'm saying let's move the discussion to a format that will bring more long benefits. Plus this is an anonymous coin which is marketed to privacy-oriented individuals. Hosting the main forum here where the owners of bitcointalk freeze your account if you use TOR or i2p then charge a fee to unlock it makes absolutely no sense. Its like trying to promote aethism on an evangelical christian forum.. Just doesnt make much sense.

Or every 10 pages there is a post that demonstrates the cliffs of this project to keep everyone on track.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
As a matter of fact the main point of this area is to "announce" an altcoin. I doubt the concept of 2000+ page threads were ever looked at by anyone as effective. Most of you making a call about critical mass just care about the price going up which is a short term goal. Long term this thread will be 2000+ pages with zero organization and alot of valuable topics will be lost in the sea of pages. At that point I doubt you or anyone else will be willing to go through each individual page to catalog key points.

I'm not saying to close this thread.. I'm saying let's move the discussion to a format that will bring more long benefits. Plus this is an anonymous coin which is marketed to privacy-oriented individuals. Hosting the main forum here where the owners of bitcointalk freeze your account if you use TOR or i2p then charge a fee to unlock it makes absolutely no sense. Its like trying to promote aethism on an evangelical christian forum.. Just doesnt make much sense.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Im back and read the pages i missed.

I like the WhitePaper Dagger.

I also find the idea somewhat risky though

but i like it
what risk do you see?

buyers and sellers to trade with one another without a governing central point of control.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Hey everyone,

I just signed up @ https://cryptocointalk.com/ they are a TOR/I2P/VPN friendly cryptocurrency forum. Anyone else in favor of moving the official CLOAK forum over to cryptocointalk?

For those of you that don't know this forum is extorting TOR/I2P/VPN users for money. IMO this forum is not the best place to have an anonymous currency discussion.. The hypocritical thing is the forum is "Sponsored by https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/, a Bitcoin-accepting VPN."

Also check out their "premium forums" seems like it would be a better setup than this (being able to have sub-forums etc).

Sample Pages:
https://cryptocointalk.com/forum/411-bitcoin-scrypt-btc/
https://cryptocointalk.com/forum/232-cryptocoin-premium-forums/

I see no reason why it should be moved to Cryptcoitalk... BCT is a much bigger forum.

+1 need to stay where the critical mass is - which is here.

Main reason is organization of discussion. The altcoin threads on this forum feel like 6 people all talkin over each other about different topics. Having a different thread for technical issues, trading, marketing, one for each of the planned Cloak products, etc would do wonders to grow this community. Seems like every page on here someone asks the same issue about dll or how to resnyc their wallet.

When these threads get too long its almost impossible to find relative information.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Im back and read the pages i missed.

I like the WhitePaper Dagger.

I also find the idea somewhat risky though

but i like it
what risk do you see?
sr. member
Activity: 522
Merit: 266
Hey everyone,

I just signed up @ https://cryptocointalk.com/ they are a TOR/I2P/VPN friendly cryptocurrency forum. Anyone else in favor of moving the official CLOAK forum over to cryptocointalk?

For those of you that don't know this forum is extorting TOR/I2P/VPN users for money. IMO this forum is not the best place to have an anonymous currency discussion.. The hypocritical thing is the forum is "Sponsored by https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/, a Bitcoin-accepting VPN."

Also check out their "premium forums" seems like it would be a better setup than this (being able to have sub-forums etc).

Sample Pages:
https://cryptocointalk.com/forum/411-bitcoin-scrypt-btc/
https://cryptocointalk.com/forum/232-cryptocoin-premium-forums/

I see no reason why it should be moved to Cryptcoitalk... BCT is a much bigger forum.

+1 need to stay where the critical mass is - which is here.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Hey everyone,

I just signed up @ https://cryptocointalk.com/ they are a TOR/I2P/VPN friendly cryptocurrency forum. Anyone else in favor of moving the official CLOAK forum over to cryptocointalk?

For those of you that don't know this forum is extorting TOR/I2P/VPN users for money. IMO this forum is not the best place to have an anonymous currency discussion.. The hypocritical thing is the forum is "Sponsored by https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/, a Bitcoin-accepting VPN."

Also check out their "premium forums" seems like it would be a better setup than this (being able to have sub-forums etc).

Sample Pages:
https://cryptocointalk.com/forum/411-bitcoin-scrypt-btc/
https://cryptocointalk.com/forum/232-cryptocoin-premium-forums/

I see no reason why it should be moved to Cryptcoitalk... BCT is a much bigger forum.
Jump to: