Author

Topic: [ANN] CLOUDMINR - page 125. (Read 223737 times)

full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
January 25, 2015, 03:32:59 PM
Yeah, just checked, balance is now 0 Smiley Looks like i made it in time woohoo Smiley
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
★Bitin.io★ - Instant Exchange
January 25, 2015, 02:43:34 PM
I have just bought a 50 gh, have i made it in time for this week's payout ?

depends on do you have 0.001BTC on you balance or not
you may have it if you have registered couple of day before (mined by trial 100 ghs)

I'm waiting for this payment. at last I have one active referral (between 35 passive) Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 318
Merit: 250
January 25, 2015, 02:26:23 PM
I have just bought a 50 gh, have i made it in time for this week's payout ?

Have you been mining prior to buying the 50gh?  If you just bought the 50gh without actually having mining power previously, I wouldn't expect a payout.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
January 25, 2015, 02:00:06 PM
I have just bought a 50 gh, have i made it in time for this week's payout ?
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
January 25, 2015, 08:41:06 AM
today big day : payment day
well, we are waiting for this
i hope this system will alive for a long time..
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 500
January 25, 2015, 04:00:39 AM
only one of them
cex.io Smiley

cex.io hasn't disappeared though, nor has it broken its contract.

They have just "temporarily" stopped payouts.

With difficulty going down and the price at at more than 240$ they should be close to mine again.
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
January 25, 2015, 02:40:58 AM
CEX has broken own rules in FAQ: Guarantee compensation for loss. So I call them scammers with real company adress. I lost some profits because of CEX's outdated mining-hardware, but compensated it with daytrading. As long CEX has no plan and no willing to compensate mining and GHS loss, I will not invest there anymore.

That's not CEX breaking their contract, that's CEX following it. The fact you didn't make a profit from mining is irrelevant, that's your own problem for buying overpriced contracts based on obsolete hardware. If you was mining at home, and didn't make a profit would you call the company that sold the miner to you a scammer?

No, the company is not the scammer, the fault lies with you.

Good luck, Cloudminr - I'm with you till the end ...  Grin

You don't have a choice in the matter.
full member
Activity: 197
Merit: 100
Money does not make happy, but sexy ;)
January 24, 2015, 10:21:33 PM
only one of them
cex.io Smiley

cex.io hasn't disappeared though, nor has it broken its contract.

They have just "temporarily" stopped payouts.


[Sorry for my following bad English ... I'm german  Cheesy]

CEX has broken own rules in FAQ: Guarantee compensation for loss. So I call them scammers with real company adress. I lost some profits because of CEX's outdated mining-hardware, but compensated it with daytrading. As long CEX has no plan and no willing to compensate mining and GHS loss, I will not invest there anymore.
Well, there is another cloud I've trusted with good experiences: BCS (BitcoinCloudService). I got my ROI allready and I'm happy about because it's not easy to find a cloud or HYIP with positive interests at the end of the game. I hope, Cloudminr will be another BCS, but of course I'm a realist and don't believe in 5-Year-contracts. Wink 180 to 360 days should be enough to get a good ROI with interests no bank is able to offer. 90-180 days is outstanding.
I don't understand people who spend lifetime for deep investigation of possible ponzis and their owners. Waste of time, because it's only a game and the only rule is: first in - first out.
Cloudminr could be a ponzi-sheme - I don't know, but I believe it is not such a sheme, because of its publicrelation. I believe, the team behind Cloudminr has a plan to be the first cloud to reach a 5-year-contract. And some day BTC will be stable enough to become another set of Fiat.

Good luck, Cloudminr - I'm with you till the end ...  Grin

best regards,
ritch <- not a supporter but investor Wink
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
January 24, 2015, 11:54:35 AM
only one of them
cex.io Smiley

cex.io hasn't disappeared though, nor has it broken its contract.

They have just "temporarily" stopped payouts.

As specified in the contract. It's just like someone mining for profit at home turning their miner off because the electricity costs became greater than the mining reward. That's why claims of 5 year contracts are pure nonsense - miners don't remain profitable for anywhere near that amount of time.

All legitimate services will have such termination clauses in their contract, scams don't need them though.
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
January 24, 2015, 11:07:39 AM
only one of them
cex.io Smiley

cex.io hasn't disappeared though, nor has it broken its contract.

They have just "temporarily" stopped payouts.
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
January 24, 2015, 10:07:47 AM
only one of them
cex.io Smiley

cex.io hasn't disappeared though, nor has it broken its contract.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
★Bitin.io★ - Instant Exchange
January 24, 2015, 10:04:02 AM
If it's already public - why are you asking for it?

Because I don't know which ones they are.

Well, it's common sense...

If your account balance to be paid out is 1 BTC in on Wednesday, you re-invest your account balance, then it becomes 0 BTC. Because you used it to purchase a mining contract. And your payout will be 1 BTC instead of 2 BTC.

No, it's not common sense. If you re-invest, the payout should be greater (unless mining circumstances change drastically) because you've increased your hash rate. If you get paid 1 BTC one week and reinvest that 1 BTC to double your hashing power, if mining circumstances stay the same you'd get 2 BTC back the next week. The next week you would get another 2 BTC and have 4 BTC. If you didn't reinvest you'd still have 1 BTC, get 1 BTC the next week and have a total of 2 BTC. The next week you would have a total of 3 BTC.

How many cloud "mining" services have started and disappeared since cloudminr.io was announced? I can name 4 - 5. And I don't follow our competitors at all. It says something about the cloud mining market, doesn't it?

I tend to believe that with the amount of competition and the disfigured market due to ponzi schemes, starting / and running an illegitimate cloud mining service is no longer profitable.

We don't get tons of sales from new users and we don't advertise (we have spent 0.05 BTC on banners and under 2 BTC on signature campaign in November). We don't have insane 15% referral commissions. Have we disappeared?

How many of those refused to provide any evidence of legitimacy just like you? How many of them did provide evidence of legitimacy?

only one of them
cex.io Smiley
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
January 24, 2015, 09:02:42 AM
If it's already public - why are you asking for it?

Because I don't know which ones they are.

Well, it's common sense...

If your account balance to be paid out is 1 BTC in on Wednesday, you re-invest your account balance, then it becomes 0 BTC. Because you used it to purchase a mining contract. And your payout will be 1 BTC instead of 2 BTC.

No, it's not common sense. If you re-invest, the payout should be greater (unless mining circumstances change drastically) because you've increased your hash rate. If you get paid 1 BTC one week and reinvest that 1 BTC to double your hashing power, if mining circumstances stay the same you'd get 2 BTC back the next week. The next week you would get another 2 BTC and have 4 BTC. If you didn't reinvest you'd still have 1 BTC, get 1 BTC the next week and have a total of 2 BTC. The next week you would have a total of 3 BTC.

How many cloud "mining" services have started and disappeared since cloudminr.io was announced? I can name 4 - 5. And I don't follow our competitors at all. It says something about the cloud mining market, doesn't it?

I tend to believe that with the amount of competition and the disfigured market due to ponzi schemes, starting / and running an illegitimate cloud mining service is no longer profitable.

We don't get tons of sales from new users and we don't advertise (we have spent 0.05 BTC on banners and under 2 BTC on signature campaign in November). We don't have insane 15% referral commissions. Have we disappeared?

How many of those refused to provide any evidence of legitimacy just like you? How many of them did provide evidence of legitimacy?
full member
Activity: 197
Merit: 100
Money does not make happy, but sexy ;)
January 24, 2015, 08:23:21 AM
Also, for those refunds that you mentioned, show the transaction of people actually paying you that amount in the first place. Why should anyone believe you otherwise?

It is up to users themselves to share their payment information - we are not going to publicly share transaction and payment data without users consent as you are requesting us to do.

That data is already public and you didn't mind sharing that data for the refunds.

If it's already public - why are you asking for it?


Really? So getting paid 0.3782374 BTC one week and 0.05441038 BTC the next week makes sense to you?

Yes, it does make sense. Re-investing account balance makes payout smaller.

That's good to know for people thinking of re-investing. Who doesn't want to make their payout smaller?  Roll Eyes

Well, it's common sense...

If your account balance to be paid out is 1 BTC in on Wednesday, you re-invest your account balance, then it becomes 0 BTC. Because you used it to purchase a mining contract. And your payout will be 1 BTC instead of 2 BTC.

@cloudminr:
Well, you can't ignore him, but I can.  Grin
full member
Activity: 197
Merit: 100
Money does not make happy, but sexy ;)
January 24, 2015, 07:28:06 AM
I always re invest in cloudminr io and making 0 payout Cheesy

you are optimistic Smiley
how much ghs you already have?
I started from 50, now have 66.

I was not sure at the beginning, so I've invested 50GHS only. Then I saw: withdrawal and internal reinvestment works fine for me (in time). So I bought a second contract over 50GHS. In meanwhile I got extra 57GHS for "free" AND some weekly withdrawals. (ok, peanuts for me - normaly I think in THS) This withdrawals leads to other clouds or Hyips for splitting risks and extra compound (plus "asynchron daytrading" and 24/7-BOT-action), to reach my ROI faster. I could lose all investments, but only in the worst case of: BTC would be nothing worth in Fiats or Gold anymore.

No problem so far. BTC is still alive! (In the last two days i made 10% in daytrading "asychron".) Grin

Let's hope:
1) Difficulty will not raise too fast.
2) BTC/USD ratio will raise again (I'm pretty sure it will and it does atm).
3) Cloudminr has good reserves and real modern hardware because of a good bussiness-plan.

Well, there is no income without any hope nor risks - or in other words: Nobody can win in lottery without buying a ticket. Wink There is also no need to scam investors, as long Clouds and HYIPs (would) believe in BTC long-term, too. *thinkpositive* ... and allways be carefull: Split your risks and never invest all in one!
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
★Bitin.io★ - Instant Exchange
January 24, 2015, 05:48:22 AM
I always re invest in cloudminr io and making 0 payout Cheesy

you are optimistic Smiley
how much ghs you already have?
I started from 50, now have 66.
sr. member
Activity: 637
Merit: 262
January 24, 2015, 05:42:02 AM
I always re invest in cloudminr io and making 0 payout Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
January 24, 2015, 04:43:01 AM
Also, for those refunds that you mentioned, show the transaction of people actually paying you that amount in the first place. Why should anyone believe you otherwise?

It is up to users themselves to share their payment information - we are not going to publicly share transaction and payment data without users consent as you are requesting us to do.

That data is already public and you didn't mind sharing that data for the refunds.

Really? So getting paid 0.3782374 BTC one week and 0.05441038 BTC the next week makes sense to you?

Yes, it does make sense. Re-investing account balance makes payout smaller.

That's good to know for people thinking of re-investing. Who doesn't want to make their payout smaller?  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I AM A SCAMMER
January 21, 2015, 01:36:34 PM
1CRC37wFKwWwRPDtRPs9fDsQ9xxaTSR16a provides the initial funding to 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 on 2014-12-05 08:18:57.

1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 has received payment from 1CMR1qXfBSAuBzd6vFKSrhpfpWWiptHjCP on the following occasions:

2015-01-04 22:04:03 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Spent) 0.19327382 BTC
2015-01-03 20:00:32 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Spent) 0.18126296 BTC
2015-01-02 20:09:29 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Spent) 0.18389129 BTC
2015-01-01 20:02:45 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Spent) 0.69087128 BTC
2014-12-28 20:46:41 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Unspent) 0.05441038 BTC
2014-12-21 23:03:52 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Spent) 0.3782374 BTC
2014-12-14 20:20:06 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Unspent) 0.09201893 BTC
2014-12-07 22:10:14 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Unspent) 0.08978733 BTC

Those payouts make no sense which brings to question the post by "kingbruce".

Seriously? If that does not make sense to you, nobody should take you seriously at all.

Nobody actually takes him seriously at all... He has a history of being kicked out of DefaultTrust for leaving baseless -ve feedback. He is now trying his best to boost AM hash shares so that he can make some money... Tongue


legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
January 21, 2015, 11:28:53 AM
1CRC37wFKwWwRPDtRPs9fDsQ9xxaTSR16a provides the initial funding to 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 on 2014-12-05 08:18:57.

1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 has received payment from 1CMR1qXfBSAuBzd6vFKSrhpfpWWiptHjCP on the following occasions:

2015-01-04 22:04:03 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Spent) 0.19327382 BTC
2015-01-03 20:00:32 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Spent) 0.18126296 BTC
2015-01-02 20:09:29 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Spent) 0.18389129 BTC
2015-01-01 20:02:45 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Spent) 0.69087128 BTC
2014-12-28 20:46:41 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Unspent) 0.05441038 BTC
2014-12-21 23:03:52 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Spent) 0.3782374 BTC
2014-12-14 20:20:06 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Unspent) 0.09201893 BTC
2014-12-07 22:10:14 1L3Mndd8F9mQMLUFzWX8sPnVaJx3WkYfa4 - (Unspent) 0.08978733 BTC

Those payouts make no sense which brings to question the post by "kingbruce".

Seriously? If that does not make sense to you, nobody should take you seriously at all.

Really? So getting paid 0.3782374 BTC one week and 0.05441038 BTC the next week makes sense to you? Also, for those refunds that you mentioned, show the transaction of people actually paying you that amount in the first place. Why should anyone believe you otherwise?
Jump to: