I really want this to succeed.
Not sure about the fairness of Sharecoin. There are already 1530 applicants.
We must admit that the Comm dev worked very hard to get even 500 people after a month. Now Sharecoin has collected within 24 hours 3 times as much people
People are already started questioning this on their thread.
By the way I just saw a nem rule on Sharecoin: That you won't receive any coin at all if you used cloned accounts. Now how would they know that? So is it 1 Bitcointalk account per household or what? This is only the beginning of being a messed up coin as well if you start changing rules after the game has started - Don't you agree GatorMj?
And don't get me wrong I'm not against Sharecoin. I'd love to be part of that as well, just saying that no distribution model can satisfy everyone.
There is no such thing as a fair or a scam coin. It's all about people and their behaviour.
Correct. It is about behaviour.
The Comm dev had a good idea and intention, I believe. The distribution did not go smoothly, and errors were made (not least in trusting too many people, I cannot get the details I would like to see, but I am letting it drop because there are better things to do), it was a novel idea.
Now Sharecoin is using the same idea, and has hopefully learnt from the errors of Comm.
If detractors are rude and dismissive, they are making a mistake in behaving that way, but I think they will learn in time. I recommend a polite and respectful approach: that has always served me well.. I have respect for all developers who try new ideas, and put work in. I will follow sharecoin with interest. The initial distribution will matter less in the long term than the real projects.
Comm is going through the growth process, and will continue development.
only put 100k to sell, never sold them 
