Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN]: cpuminer-opt v3.8.8.1, open source optimized multi-algo CPU miner - page 66. (Read 444040 times)

newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0

Which package needs to version 1.1?
libssl-dev or libcurl4-openssl-dev?

I have Ubuntu 16.04

How do I compile without SHA?

I thought the hash rate was pretty good for a 10w CPU.

I just enjoy playing, not any profit really.

libssl-dev 1.1 is needed but Ubuntu 16.04 has 1.0.2. None of the major distributions seem to have it yet.

How did you compile, did you change any options or just use the build script?
The option to add sha is "-msha" but the default compile probably includes it.
You might have to do something like "-maes -mavx" "-maes -msse4.2" instead
of the default "-march=native" to compile without sha.

Edit: correction, Goldmont doesn't have AVX.

I used the ./build.sh script to compile with HW SHA enabled and libssl-dev 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 installed.

It is slower without the HW SHA.

./cpuminer -a m7m --benchmark

         **********  cpuminer-opt 3.6.6  ***********
     A CPU miner with multi algo support and optimized for CPUs
     with AES_NI and AVX extensions.
     BTC donation address: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT
     Forked from TPruvot's cpuminer-multi with credits
     to Lucas Jones, elmad, palmd, djm34, pooler, ig0tik3d,
     Wolf0, Jeff Garzik and Optiminer.

CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J3455 @ 1.50GHz
CPU features: SSE2 AES SHA
SW built on Jul 23 2017 with GCC 5.4.0
SW features: SSE2 AES
Algo features: SSE2 AES AVX SHA
Start mining with SSE2 AES

[2017-07-23 21:24:36] 4 miner threads started, using 'm7m' algorithm.
[2017-07-23 21:24:55] CPU #2: 131.07 kH, 6991.75 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:24:55] CPU #3: 131.07 kH, 6983.48 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:24:55] Total: 262.14 kH, 13.98 kH/s, 40C
[2017-07-23 21:24:55] CPU #0: 131.07 kH, 6799.19 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:24:55] CPU #1: 131.07 kH, 6794.54 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:25:00] CPU #3: 34.92 kH, 7024.97 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:25:00] Total: 428.13 kH, 27.61 kH/s, 40C
[2017-07-23 21:25:00] CPU #2: 34.96 kH, 6746.14 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:25:00] CPU #0: 34.00 kH, 6795.39 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:25:00] CPU #1: 33.97 kH, 6724.83 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:25:05] CPU #3: 35.12 kH, 6922.89 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:25:05] Total: 138.05 kH, 27.19 kH/s, 39C
[2017-07-23 21:25:05] CPU #2: 33.73 kH, 6864.23 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:25:05] CPU #0: 33.98 kH, 6790.99 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:25:05] CPU #1: 33.62 kH, 6689.45 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:25:10] CPU #3: 34.62 kH, 6955.82 H/s
[2017-07-23 21:25:10] Total: 135.95 kH, 27.30 kH/s, 40C

I used debian 9 with openssl 1.1 and got the same speed as ubuntu with the libssl-dev 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 installed.

./cpuminer -a m7m --benchmark

         **********  cpuminer-opt 3.6.6  ***********
     A CPU miner with multi algo support and optimized for CPUs
     with AES_NI and AVX extensions.
     BTC donation address: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT
     Forked from TPruvot's cpuminer-multi with credits
     to Lucas Jones, elmad, palmd, djm34, pooler, ig0tik3d,
     Wolf0, Jeff Garzik and Optiminer.

CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J3455 @ 1.50GHz
CPU features: SSE2 AES SHA
SW built on Jul 24 2017 with GCC 6.3.0
SW features: SSE2 AES SHA
Algo features: SSE2 AES AVX SHA
Start mining with SSE2 AES SHA

[2017-07-24 02:23:37] 4 miner threads started, using 'm7m' algorithm.
[2017-07-24 02:23:50] CPU #3: 131.07 kH, 10.00 kH/s
[2017-07-24 02:23:50] Total: 131.07 kH, 10.00 kH/s, 37C
[2017-07-24 02:23:50] CPU #2: 131.07 kH, 9817.99 H/s
[2017-07-24 02:23:51] CPU #1: 131.07 kH, 9474.24 H/s
[2017-07-24 02:23:51] CPU #0: 131.07 kH, 9293.29 H/s
[2017-07-24 02:23:55] CPU #0: 37.17 kH, 9407.19 H/s
[2017-07-24 02:23:55] CPU #1: 37.90 kH, 8790.50 H/s
[2017-07-24 02:23:55] CPU #3: 50.01 kH, 9838.35 H/s
[2017-07-24 02:23:55] Total: 256.15 kH, 37.85 kH/s, 38C
[2017-07-24 02:23:55] CPU #2: 49.09 kH, 9702.19 H/s
[2017-07-24 02:24:00] CPU #1: 43.95 kH, 9022.16 H/s
[2017-07-24 02:24:00] CPU #3: 49.19 kH, 9912.67 H/s
[2017-07-24 02:24:00] Total: 179.41 kH, 38.04 kH/s, 38C

hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 502

Which package needs to version 1.1?
libssl-dev or libcurl4-openssl-dev?

I have Ubuntu 16.04

How do I compile without SHA?

I thought the hash rate was pretty good for a 10w CPU.

I just enjoy playing, not any profit really.

libssl-dev 1.1 is needed but Ubuntu 16.04 has 1.0.2. None of the major distributions seem to have it yet.

How did you compile, did you change any options or just use the build script?
The option to add sha is "-msha" but the default compile probably includes it.
You might have to do something like "-maes -mavx" "-maes -msse4.2" instead
of the default "-march=native" to compile without sha.

Edit: correction, Goldmont doesn't have AVX.
Debian 9 has libssl-dev 1.1.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114

Which package needs to version 1.1?
libssl-dev or libcurl4-openssl-dev?

I have Ubuntu 16.04

How do I compile without SHA?

I thought the hash rate was pretty good for a 10w CPU.

I just enjoy playing, not any profit really.

libssl-dev 1.1 is needed but Ubuntu 16.04 has 1.0.2. None of the major distributions seem to have it yet.

How did you compile, did you change any options or just use the build script?
The option to add sha is "-msha" but the default compile probably includes it.
You might have to do something like "-maes -mavx" "-maes -msse4.2" instead
of the default "-march=native" to compile without sha.

Edit: correction, Goldmont doesn't have AVX.
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0

It looks like hw sha to me?

         **********  cpuminer-opt 3.6.6  ***********
     A CPU miner with multi algo support and optimized for CPUs
     with AES_NI and AVX extensions.
     BTC donation address: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT
     Forked from TPruvot's cpuminer-multi with credits
     to Lucas Jones, elmad, palmd, djm34, pooler, ig0tik3d,
     Wolf0, Jeff Garzik and Optiminer.

CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J3455 @ 1.50GHz
CPU features: SSE2 AES SHA
SW built on Jul  4 2017 with GCC 5.4.0
SW features: SSE2 AES SHA
Algo features: SSE2 AES AVX SHA
Start mining with SSE2 AES SHA

[2017-07-23 15:21:13] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xmg.suprnova.cc:7128
[2017-07-23 15:21:13] 4 miner threads started, using 'm7m' algorithm.

[2017-07-23 15:21:13] Stratum difficulty set to 8
[2017-07-23 15:21:17] m7m block 1418024, diff 7.180
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] m7m block 1418025, diff 7.180
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] CPU #2: 19.29 kH, 8515.43 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] CPU #0: 22.44 kH, 9851.52 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] CPU #1: 21.60 kH, 9509.43 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] CPU #3: 20.52 kH, 9059.83 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:27] CPU #2: 67.76 kH, 8803.45 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:27] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 132.33 kH, 37.22 kH/s, 44C


That's very interesting. SHA is not mentioned here...

https://ark.intel.com/products/95594/Intel-Celeron-Processor-J3455-2M-Cache-up-to-2_3-GHz

But here it is...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldmont

OK so you have a Goldmont and it is the only Intel CPU to support SHA at this time.

It looks like all the boxes are checked, CPU, compiler, build and algo. The only question seems to be
the version of openssl. Cpuminer doesn't check the version but it needs to be 1.1 to have HW SHA support.
The only way to be sure is to compare the hash rate with a non-SHA compile.

Edit: strictly speaking, when cpuminer says it's mining with SHA it means it is using the openssl version
instead of its own SW version, but it's no guarantee that openssl is using the HW SHA instructions.



Which package needs to version 1.1?
libssl-dev or libcurl4-openssl-dev?

I have Ubuntu 16.04

How do I compile without SHA?

I thought the hash rate was pretty good for a 10w CPU.

I just enjoy playing, not any profit really.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114

It looks like hw sha to me?

         **********  cpuminer-opt 3.6.6  ***********
     A CPU miner with multi algo support and optimized for CPUs
     with AES_NI and AVX extensions.
     BTC donation address: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT
     Forked from TPruvot's cpuminer-multi with credits
     to Lucas Jones, elmad, palmd, djm34, pooler, ig0tik3d,
     Wolf0, Jeff Garzik and Optiminer.

CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J3455 @ 1.50GHz
CPU features: SSE2 AES SHA
SW built on Jul  4 2017 with GCC 5.4.0
SW features: SSE2 AES SHA
Algo features: SSE2 AES AVX SHA
Start mining with SSE2 AES SHA

[2017-07-23 15:21:13] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xmg.suprnova.cc:7128
[2017-07-23 15:21:13] 4 miner threads started, using 'm7m' algorithm.

[2017-07-23 15:21:13] Stratum difficulty set to 8
[2017-07-23 15:21:17] m7m block 1418024, diff 7.180
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] m7m block 1418025, diff 7.180
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] CPU #2: 19.29 kH, 8515.43 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] CPU #0: 22.44 kH, 9851.52 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] CPU #1: 21.60 kH, 9509.43 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] CPU #3: 20.52 kH, 9059.83 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:27] CPU #2: 67.76 kH, 8803.45 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:27] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 132.33 kH, 37.22 kH/s, 44C


That's very interesting. SHA is not mentioned here...

https://ark.intel.com/products/95594/Intel-Celeron-Processor-J3455-2M-Cache-up-to-2_3-GHz

But here it is...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldmont

OK so you have a Goldmont and it is the only Intel CPU to support SHA at this time.

It looks like all the boxes are checked, CPU, compiler, build and algo. The only question seems to be
the version of openssl. Cpuminer doesn't check the version but it needs to be 1.1 to have HW SHA support.
The only way to be sure is to compare the hash rate with a non-SHA compile.

Edit: strictly speaking, when cpuminer says it's mining with SHA it means it is using the openssl version
instead of its own SW version, but it's no guarantee that openssl is using the HW SHA instructions.

hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 502
What about shipping a Docker image or atleast a Dockerfile with all the latest dependencies self contained?
Looking for Ryzen owners to test SHA acceleration.

Ryzen CPUs have HW accelerated SHA, something Intel's mainstream CPUs won't have until Cannonlake.

Requirements:
  Ryzen CPU
  Linux
  Compiler version with support for sha
  Openssl development package with support for sha
  Cpuminer-opt source code with support for sha

I can provide the last one. GCC is supposed to have support for -msha starting in v 5, and Openssl added support in 2014
so both should be available in Ubuntu 16.04.

The following algos use sha256 and should benefit from HW acceleration: sha256t, lbry, skein, myr-groestl, m7m.

Intel J3455 ASRock J3455M with 1866 memory dual channel
--benchmark results
 
lbry         Total: 5287.13 kH, 1341.57 kH/s, 43C
sha256t      Total: 4643.44 kH, 6343.56 kH/s, 42C
skein         Total: 15.05 MH, 3223.62 kH/s, 45C
myr-groestl   Total: 7336.60 kH, 1480.04 kH/s, 44C
m7m         Total: 254.99 kH, 38.28 kH/s, 45C

Thanks but that CPU doesn't have HW SHA. This information is displayed
when the program starts.

Compiling is still the biggest challenge to using SHA. Few Linux distros include openssl 1.1 which added SHA support.
What about shipping a Docker image or atleast a Dockerfile with all the latest dependencies self contained?
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
Looking for Ryzen owners to test SHA acceleration.

Ryzen CPUs have HW accelerated SHA, something Intel's mainstream CPUs won't have until Cannonlake.

Requirements:
  Ryzen CPU
  Linux
  Compiler version with support for sha
  Openssl development package with support for sha
  Cpuminer-opt source code with support for sha

I can provide the last one. GCC is supposed to have support for -msha starting in v 5, and Openssl added support in 2014
so both should be available in Ubuntu 16.04.

The following algos use sha256 and should benefit from HW acceleration: sha256t, lbry, skein, myr-groestl, m7m.

Intel J3455 ASRock J3455M with 1866 memory dual channel
--benchmark results
 
lbry         Total: 5287.13 kH, 1341.57 kH/s, 43C
sha256t      Total: 4643.44 kH, 6343.56 kH/s, 42C
skein         Total: 15.05 MH, 3223.62 kH/s, 45C
myr-groestl   Total: 7336.60 kH, 1480.04 kH/s, 44C
m7m         Total: 254.99 kH, 38.28 kH/s, 45C

Thanks but that CPU doesn't have HW SHA. This information is displayed
when the program starts.

Compiling is still the biggest challenge to using SHA. Few Linux distros include openssl 1.1 which added SHA support.

It looks like HW SHA to me? This is only a 10w CPU.

         **********  cpuminer-opt 3.6.6  ***********
     A CPU miner with multi algo support and optimized for CPUs
     with AES_NI and AVX extensions.
     BTC donation address: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT
     Forked from TPruvot's cpuminer-multi with credits
     to Lucas Jones, elmad, palmd, djm34, pooler, ig0tik3d,
     Wolf0, Jeff Garzik and Optiminer.

CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J3455 @ 1.50GHz
CPU features: SSE2 AES SHA
SW built on Jul  4 2017 with GCC 5.4.0
SW features: SSE2 AES SHA
Algo features: SSE2 AES AVX SHA
Start mining with SSE2 AES SHA

[2017-07-23 15:21:13] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xmg.suprnova.cc:7128
[2017-07-23 15:21:13] 4 miner threads started, using 'm7m' algorithm.

[2017-07-23 15:21:13] Stratum difficulty set to 8
[2017-07-23 15:21:17] m7m block 1418024, diff 7.180
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] m7m block 1418025, diff 7.180
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] CPU #2: 19.29 kH, 8515.43 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] CPU #0: 22.44 kH, 9851.52 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] CPU #1: 21.60 kH, 9509.43 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:19] CPU #3: 20.52 kH, 9059.83 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:27] CPU #2: 67.76 kH, 8803.45 H/s
[2017-07-23 15:21:27] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 132.33 kH, 37.22 kH/s, 44C
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
Looking for Ryzen owners to test SHA acceleration.

Ryzen CPUs have HW accelerated SHA, something Intel's mainstream CPUs won't have until Cannonlake.

Requirements:
  Ryzen CPU
  Linux
  Compiler version with support for sha
  Openssl development package with support for sha
  Cpuminer-opt source code with support for sha

I can provide the last one. GCC is supposed to have support for -msha starting in v 5, and Openssl added support in 2014
so both should be available in Ubuntu 16.04.

The following algos use sha256 and should benefit from HW acceleration: sha256t, lbry, skein, myr-groestl, m7m.

Intel J3455 ASRock J3455M with 1866 memory dual channel
--benchmark results
 
lbry         Total: 5287.13 kH, 1341.57 kH/s, 43C
sha256t      Total: 4643.44 kH, 6343.56 kH/s, 42C
skein         Total: 15.05 MH, 3223.62 kH/s, 45C
myr-groestl   Total: 7336.60 kH, 1480.04 kH/s, 44C
m7m         Total: 254.99 kH, 38.28 kH/s, 45C

Thanks but that CPU doesn't have HW SHA. This information is displayed
when the program starts.

Compiling is still the biggest challenge to using SHA. Few Linux distros include openssl 1.1 which added SHA support.
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
Looking for Ryzen owners to test SHA acceleration.

Ryzen CPUs have HW accelerated SHA, something Intel's mainstream CPUs won't have until Cannonlake.

Requirements:
  Ryzen CPU
  Linux
  Compiler version with support for sha
  Openssl development package with support for sha
  Cpuminer-opt source code with support for sha

I can provide the last one. GCC is supposed to have support for -msha starting in v 5, and Openssl added support in 2014
so both should be available in Ubuntu 16.04.

The following algos use sha256 and should benefit from HW acceleration: sha256t, lbry, skein, myr-groestl, m7m.

Intel J3455 ASRock J3455M with 1866 memory dual channel
--benchmark results
 
lbry         Total: 5287.13 kH, 1341.57 kH/s, 43C
sha256t      Total: 4643.44 kH, 6343.56 kH/s, 42C
skein         Total: 15.05 MH, 3223.62 kH/s, 45C
myr-groestl   Total: 7336.60 kH, 1480.04 kH/s, 44C
m7m         Total: 254.99 kH, 38.28 kH/s, 45C
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 502
Any thoughts on AMD Threadripper for mining?

It should be the equivalent of 2 Ryzen 1700X or 1800X CPUs, so a pretty darned good miner if you can afford the price. Smiley
An advertised feature of Ryzen PRO is "Built-in AES 128-bit Encryption engine" which I wonder if it will benefit mining.
sr. member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 274
Any thoughts on AMD Threadripper for mining?

It should be the equivalent of 2 Ryzen 1700X or 1800X CPUs, so a pretty darned good miner if you can afford the price. Smiley
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 502
Any thoughts on AMD Threadripper for mining?
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114

Preliminary results:

Ryzen 1700X @ stock settings with 8 threads set in the batch file.

Lyra2v2 = 1001 Kh/s on avx2
             = 1016 Kh/s on avx
Timetravel = 799 Kh/s on avx2
                = 843 Kh/s on avx
X11          = 686 Kh/s on avx2
                = 711 Kh/s on avx
X17          = 294 Kh/s on avx2
                = 294 Kh/s on avx

X17 was the same for both options, but I was surprised to see avx beating avx2 for the other algorithms tested. My understanding was that it would likely be the other way around....


Disappointing results. AVX2 provides 256 bit vectors vs 128 bit for AVX. Ignoring any memory accesses the AVX2
code uses half the instructions to do the same processing so should be twice as fast.

Most of the AVX2 code is in the x11 chain so it should see a bigger difference than x17.

I had heard that Ryzen had a "faked" AVX2 and your test seems to prove it and that it performs worse than AVX.
I was concerned it wouldn't be any faster than AVX but never considered that it would be slower.
The only reason I can think of to include it is for compatibility with any hard coded AVX2. IMO they should have
left it out.

It appears that AVX2 should continue to be avoided on AMD CPUs.

Thanks for testing.
sr. member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 274

I am still curious about AVX2 performance on Ryzen. I have read that their implementation isn't native but I haven't
seen any performance comparisons. If anyone has a Ryzen I would be interested in a performance comparison of
AVX vs AVX2 on algos that have AVX2 optimizations.



If you can list the algos you would like tested I can try it out on both Ryzen R7 1700X and R5 1600 CPUs. Possibly on Threadripper too towards the end of summer if I talk myself into getting one. Wink

Lyra2v2, Lyra2z and Deep have the most AVX2 and should see the biggest improvement. All the X algos, qubit, timetravel
and a few others also have varying amounts of AVX2 code.

Preliminary results:

Ryzen 1700X @ stock settings with 8 threads set in the batch file.

Lyra2v2 = 1001 Kh/s on avx2
             = 1016 Kh/s on avx
Timetravel = 799 Kh/s on avx2
                = 843 Kh/s on avx
X11          = 686 Kh/s on avx2
                = 711 Kh/s on avx
X17          = 294 Kh/s on avx2
                = 294 Kh/s on avx

X17 was the same for both options, but I was surprised to see avx beating avx2 for the other algorithms tested. My understanding was that it would likely be the other way around....
full member
Activity: 260
Merit: 129
Hello, with a Intel CPU i7 3820 what is the best .exe files to use on windows ?
cpuminer-aes-avx.exe
cpuminer-aes-avx2.exe
cpuminer-aes-sse42.exe
cpuminer-sse2.exe
cpuminer-sse42.exe

?
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114

I am still curious about AVX2 performance on Ryzen. I have read that their implementation isn't native but I haven't
seen any performance comparisons. If anyone has a Ryzen I would be interested in a performance comparison of
AVX vs AVX2 on algos that have AVX2 optimizations.



If you can list the algos you would like tested I can try it out on both Ryzen R7 1700X and R5 1600 CPUs. Possibly on Threadripper too towards the end of summer if I talk myself into getting one. Wink

Lyra2v2, Lyra2z and Deep have the most AVX2 and should see the biggest improvement. All the X algos, qubit, timetravel
and a few others also have varying amounts of AVX2 code.
sr. member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 274
AMD just announced Ryzen PRO with "Built-in AES 128-bit Encryption engine" so will that have any impact on mining?

I found the announcement, it would have been nice if you had posted the link.

https://www.amd.com/en/ryzen-pro

It's all marketing speak so I have no idea what it means technically. AES_NI is already a 128 bit encryption
and decryption engine so I have no idea what improvements are implied, maybe a faster implementation.

Another implied improvement is the mention of low-latency cache. Intel cache performance is currently better
than AMD so maybe the're catching up. That combined with the larger-than-Intel cache size could further give
an edge to AMD in the CPU market.

With Ryzen they have pulled ahead of Intel with threads, price, cache size, HW SHA. Between Threadripper
(4 channel DDR4, more threads, even bigger cache) and whatever improvements come in the Ryzen Pro there's
not much left where Intel has an edge.

It's nice to see some real competition in the CPU market. It will be interesting to see how Intel will respond.

On a bit of a tangent...

I am still curious about AVX2 performance on Ryzen. I have read that their implementation isn't native but I haven't
seen any performance comparisons. If anyone has a Ryzen I would be interested in a performance comparison of
AVX vs AVX2 on algos that have AVX2 optimizations.



If you can list the algos you would like tested I can try it out on both Ryzen R7 1700X and R5 1600 CPUs. Possibly on Threadripper too towards the end of summer if I talk myself into getting one. Wink
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
@joblo
Hey, I have a Ryzen that I'd like to test HW SHA on. But from what I understand you have to compile the sources yourself which is a bit beyond me. Any plans of adding windows binaries with this function compiled in?
Thanks.

I have not found a way to compile on Windows with SHA. I have tried 3 different mingw environments without success.
One user was successful but didn't share his procedure.
Pages:
Jump to: