I'll go straight to the point. This week I stopped being an employee of Credits.
At the moment, in Russia, the office in Volgograd was closed, and 60% of the employees of the Moscow office were reduced this week. Of the 110 announced on the site, there are not more than 50 employees left, most of whom are marketers. First of all, most developers were dismissed in one day.
The good news - at the coffee machine chat I learned that the team lead belives that 100 000 transactions per second is achieveable. But with minor smart contracts code and with high speed commercial internet connection. But this option is too expensive and not covered by the main node payment decision.
As for counterfeit partnerships, please note that ICO Swandis is being made the brother of our COO David Kolmakhidze, and other partnerships do not have half the pages working on the sites.
It is worth noting that the communication between the departments is completely lost. Neighboring departments do not know that their colleagues are fired. Marketers from the last forces try to approximate the value of the coin, and the dismissed employees make collective claims to the court.
Being discharged, I am no longer obliged to comply with the regime of commercial secrecy. You can ask a question directly to my email [email protected]
p.s. your opinion leaders get a good salary from the Credits management. Today the money was transferred to Balina. And also some heads of the Credits are carrying out a new ICO. Keep away from the scammers names of the Credits team.
First and foremost, it is necessary to note that development of the product is the utmost priority for Credits. It is indeed a huge effort to meet an ambitious goal and it does take longer than we expected from the beginning. As we all know the market downtrend has affected lots of blockchain companies, with Credits not being an exception. Unfortunately, we did have to optimize some of the departments based on the efficiency, yet all of the developers involved in the crucial processes remain a part of the team.
All projects blame the financial downtrend for any delays, but what's the issue with the downtrend regarding speed of development? With good financial management there shouldn't be any delays only because the market looks bad.
If projects did not cash out their ether/bitcoin that they raised during ICO, they now have portions of what they initally raised, best of luck to Credit team