Topic: [ANN] CRYPTO FOCUS - Masternode, Anon Tx - page 7. (Read 31711 times)

Need some updates before that interests me!

Where is the Warp zone?

I'm really thinking of buying those 125K coins and own 50% of FCS

The logic about cryptoworld. Coins with nothing are moving to the moon, coins with something are worthless

correct link is http://cryptofocus.info/index.php/morefun/play/super-mario
dev you've to change the first thread

I've been playing those games on the website, would be nice to have it based on fCS

Our C-CEX is enabled. 125k coins were dumped by ICO investors, those coins are put back on the market at a discount of 50% (4000sats). Depending on how much will be sold at that level we will destroy some coins.

don't worry Dev...
follow your developmente and Fudders will disappear

How would you know that? If you had taken the time to look through his posts on this thread you would know that he is a holder. You're the one who has nothing to do with this coin, and yet you are here stirring up trouble and trying to FUD. Can you explain that? Are you just a dick or are you getting paid?

You're not even holding coins, you're nothing but a paid cheerleader. 

Bittrex coming soon?

C-Cex Delisting soon? 

That is exactly what I am not sure about! We do not know who has bought the big part of ICO and has dumped on the buy wall. There is a chance it was Dev himself. I don't tell it is him, but it is possible, because that way he got 50% of the supply for free. And that is why I suggest the Dev to refuse to get those coins - this is the only way to prove it was not he who was doing this manipulation. Burning 90-95% of those coins, or handing them to escrow would prove the Dev did not made the manipulation.


Selling big number of coins at half the cost now is good for original investors...? Strange statement. It is good for the ones who buy now, but original ones will be screwed.

Anyway, I don't try to force Dev do something. I just tell what I think is good for the project (including Dev and all investors together). Dev is free to make any decision he wants, it is his project, and he is free to screw himself and/or the investors. He is the leader of this project. But when I believe "leader" does something wrong, I am not going to remain silent...

----------------------------

Why can't the Dev hand those funds to escrow, then sell them step by step after some time, after he adds some more development and earns some more trust from community (so people see he is there for long term and keeps working). Such sell-outs should be introduced beforehand of course, so community is aware and escrow can release the necessary part of funds.

If this Dev is here for long term indeed, he would do that way, and not try to get as much as he can right now.

But why does DEV owns 30 -50% of all coins??? It is not their problem that people dumped on the buy wall, no? I believe they need to keep the original ICO VS MINE amount, and they should put thodr 30 -50% back for sale, maybe at lower price as they already suggested. This is a advantage for DEV (again receive some BTC), for original ICO investors (they can buy more), etc. In fact when you check the order book then they can easily say, look we dump all those coins on market at 6PM today (for example) and people need to put their orders in, if they want it.  Or they can find a pumper group, sale those 30 - 50% of coins at a nice price, and this again give dev some BTC, some good move for the current ICO investors as they will pump the price a lot higher and everybody is happy.

Wrong is the fact that you keep at least 30-50%% of the whole supply in your hands. That's a huge pre-mine, which makes people worry.
There are few other things wrong too, but they are less important, so I don't want to elaborate (can do if you want).

Anyway, I hope you did not call me fudder, just because I raise valid point which need to be addressed. Fud is created only because of you ignoring queries from investors. I don't need this coin to fall, as I am one of those investors, but as some manipulation was going on, I want to know the Dev is clean.

The fact that you hold such a huge portion of the supply, does not mean you are going to dump it, of course. There is a good probability that you are a honest team of capable developeres wanting to advance the tech with implementing a nice bunch of features in your coin. But you know after so many scams around, you cannot expect everybody to trust you, without providing a ground to trust. You are just "newbie" account with no trust rating, and absolutely no obligations. I've seen too many such Dev to dump and run, and nobody can ever find them now. That's why I was talking about burning a part of supply, or hiring an escrow.

Only small dumping of miners      They don't have a lot of coins thanks to dev. Keep up the good work.

Why is everybody so negative?

1. Website is up and running
2. Coin is launched
3. C-CEX has put 50% as buy support
4. Hashrate sometimes jump to 5GH/s
5. ICO coins was reduced from 1,000,000 to around 240,000 coins
6. Mining coins has been reduced from 600,000 to around 200,000 coins

So tell me FUDDers, what is wrong with above? Maybe you thought to make a quick 100% return on your ICO money, guess what, it didn't happen, only for around 0.15 BTC was sold at 15,000ats. Why should FCS be suddenly worth more then 8,000 sats when it is just a few days old? This is a longer term project, and if you thought lets buy the ICO and take 100% profit then you are wrong. Buy ICO and wait a few weeks/months and have a return of 100% that is possible.

So again FUDDers what went wrong? We did steps 5 and 6 to protect the ICO investors, else the miners would already drop the coin to 1000sats and C-CEX would put a buy wall and the same miners will dump on the buywall and not the ICO investors.

hehe shark is lurking in the water...  I get it..  

This isn't about another altcoin, is it?

\


What wall are you talking about?

You're lost kid!