Author

Topic: 🌟🌟🚀 [ANN] CRYPTOFLIX 🌟🌟🚀 Watch Movies. Fund Films. Get Cryptos. Repeat. - page 229. (Read 42496 times)

full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 115
Movies can flop big time. funding a movie is a risky investment. There's no guarantee that a broader audience will care for what you consider a brilliant movie. I assume it's a hit or miss game.

The last decade was the decade of superhero blockbusters. The mainstream industry has become rather formulaic, but it works. There will be a point where superhero movies, like their comic book counterparts, become so over-the-top ridiculous no one can relate anymore, leading to a cinematic renaissance.

... or they just start over telling the same stories with different actors.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 131
#AMA

What price is planned for a monthly/annual membership?
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 10
they are not going to burn the unsold tokens or when using on their plattform? how will they be able to stabilize the price of the tokens then for the investors???
member
Activity: 546
Merit: 12
#AMA

You said you are film makers by yourself. Do you have some example of your previous work that we can watch somewhere?
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 105
#AMA

What are your requirements for a producer/company to allow crowdfunding of a movie they would like to make on your platform?
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
Unsold tokens will firstly be allocated to the reserve fund and locked for a period of 12 months with a 3-month cliff and thereafter they can be used to strengthen partnerships, market presence, marketing, technology etc.

Since unsold tokens will not be burned, does this mean that they are thus at the disposal of developers? Consequently, the command will no longer have 18% + 20% tokens, but much more. Why does it seem to me that this can affect the price of the tokens negatively? While on the other hand, even if you burn non-sold tokens, the percentage of tokens at the disposal of the team also increases. But the total number of tokens decreases, and therefore the price of tokens does not decrease significantly.

To be honest, I don't really get this idea of a reserve fund till the end, but it seems that you're right and the token price can go down since there is suddenly more tokens than it was paid for in the beginning. I would suggest to review it again, if the advantages of keeping those tokens outweight disadvantages.

It shouldn't affect the price much since the unsold tokens will be locked for a year and after that the tokens should be used to even increase the price through marketing and partnerships. If you trust the team to do so that than it's even better than burning the tokens imo.

if they're doing their job right, then the value of the token will increase. it also means that the dev's have an interest in doing a good job so they can sell their tokens for a high price.
You're absolutely right. By the way, I have a question. What will happen to the coins that people will pay to access the platform? Will the team sell them on the stock exchange?


Having more tokens in the market should devalue the value of them. I hope they are right, but I'm not so sure that not burning them is a good idea.
ICO will start in 15 of april , Hard cap 25k ETH - They have clear roadmap - I assume that it is entirely possible that there will be no unsold tokens. and if this happens, then - one year the tokens will be frozen and team will be interested would be token price was high and i hope they will fulfill all obligations according roadmap.

I like the idea and the vision, we will see from the 1st round of TGE. It should raise good enough funds with publicity and word of the mouth.
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 104
Unsold tokens will firstly be allocated to the reserve fund and locked for a period of 12 months with a 3-month cliff and thereafter they can be used to strengthen partnerships, market presence, marketing, technology etc.

Since unsold tokens will not be burned, does this mean that they are thus at the disposal of developers? Consequently, the command will no longer have 18% + 20% tokens, but much more. Why does it seem to me that this can affect the price of the tokens negatively? While on the other hand, even if you burn non-sold tokens, the percentage of tokens at the disposal of the team also increases. But the total number of tokens decreases, and therefore the price of tokens does not decrease significantly.

To be honest, I don't really get this idea of a reserve fund till the end, but it seems that you're right and the token price can go down since there is suddenly more tokens than it was paid for in the beginning. I would suggest to review it again, if the advantages of keeping those tokens outweight disadvantages.

It shouldn't affect the price much since the unsold tokens will be locked for a year and after that the tokens should be used to even increase the price through marketing and partnerships. If you trust the team to do so that than it's even better than burning the tokens imo.

if they're doing their job right, then the value of the token will increase. it also means that the dev's have an interest in doing a good job so they can sell their tokens for a high price.
You're absolutely right. By the way, I have a question. What will happen to the coins that people will pay to access the platform? Will the team sell them on the stock exchange?


Having more tokens in the market should devalue the value of them. I hope they are right, but I'm not so sure that not burning them is a good idea.
ICO will start in 15 of april , Hard cap 25k ETH - They have clear roadmap - I assume that it is entirely possible that there will be no unsold tokens. and if this happens, then - one year the tokens will be frozen and team will be interested would be token price was high and i hope they will fulfill all obligations according roadmap.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1012
#AMA

What will you do about subtitles and dubbing? Will you add them, if you do how?
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Unsold tokens will firstly be allocated to the reserve fund and locked for a period of 12 months with a 3-month cliff and thereafter they can be used to strengthen partnerships, market presence, marketing, technology etc.

Since unsold tokens will not be burned, does this mean that they are thus at the disposal of developers? Consequently, the command will no longer have 18% + 20% tokens, but much more. Why does it seem to me that this can affect the price of the tokens negatively? While on the other hand, even if you burn non-sold tokens, the percentage of tokens at the disposal of the team also increases. But the total number of tokens decreases, and therefore the price of tokens does not decrease significantly.

To be honest, I don't really get this idea of a reserve fund till the end, but it seems that you're right and the token price can go down since there is suddenly more tokens than it was paid for in the beginning. I would suggest to review it again, if the advantages of keeping those tokens outweight disadvantages.

It shouldn't affect the price much since the unsold tokens will be locked for a year and after that the tokens should be used to even increase the price through marketing and partnerships. If you trust the team to do so that than it's even better than burning the tokens imo.

if they're doing their job right, then the value of the token will increase. it also means that the dev's have an interest in doing a good job so they can sell their tokens for a high price.
You're absolutely right. By the way, I have a question. What will happen to the coins that people will pay to access the platform? Will the team sell them on the stock exchange?


Having more tokens in the market should devalue the value of them. I hope they are right, but I'm not so sure that not burning them is a good idea.
full member
Activity: 448
Merit: 107
It’s nice that the CEO will answer the question of the community, I think it’s a good point that a team listen his community, cause it’s a really important part of the developpement of a project. Have a nice and if community is one of the key of the sucess I think
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 4
Unsold tokens will firstly be allocated to the reserve fund and locked for a period of 12 months with a 3-month cliff and thereafter they can be used to strengthen partnerships, market presence, marketing, technology etc.

Since unsold tokens will not be burned, does this mean that they are thus at the disposal of developers? Consequently, the command will no longer have 18% + 20% tokens, but much more. Why does it seem to me that this can affect the price of the tokens negatively? While on the other hand, even if you burn non-sold tokens, the percentage of tokens at the disposal of the team also increases. But the total number of tokens decreases, and therefore the price of tokens does not decrease significantly.

To be honest, I don't really get this idea of a reserve fund till the end, but it seems that you're right and the token price can go down since there is suddenly more tokens than it was paid for in the beginning. I would suggest to review it again, if the advantages of keeping those tokens outweight disadvantages.

It shouldn't affect the price much since the unsold tokens will be locked for a year and after that the tokens should be used to even increase the price through marketing and partnerships. If you trust the team to do so that than it's even better than burning the tokens imo.

if they're doing their job right, then the value of the token will increase. it also means that the dev's have an interest in doing a good job so they can sell their tokens for a high price.
You're absolutely right. By the way, I have a question. What will happen to the coins that people will pay to access the platform? Will the team sell them on the stock exchange?
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 10
hey guys, on Monday morning the CEO Christian will be doing a recorded AMA with me.

Please type questions here and we will get to them in our AMA.

Please tag #AMA so I can find them easily.

Thanks!

thank you for this info ^^

#AMA
-Which countries are targeted for this project
-What kind of movies can we await to watch?
-Is it ok to advertise with licensed Movies on your Webpage? Do you have the ok of the copyright owners?
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
Are there already some potential film maker or so who want to realize some movies or series through Cryptoflix?

Not formal agreements yet, but we believe our offering is extremely attractive to film makers. Our aim is to help top quality film producers, sales agents, distributors and other film industry players to achieve funding for their projects, while at the same time offer the FLIX token holders the opportunity to act as financiers to enable them to achieve a return on the transaction. CRYPTOFLIX will be different than the existing platforms in that it will be possible to use the platform without a credit card (by using FLIX Tokens) and we will have more flexibility for the content owners in that the minimum quality requirements for entry onto the platform will be lower than the minimum standards for iTunes etc. and also our pricing structure will be more flexible. Also we can use smart contracts to share the revenue instantly with the content owners - in the current platforms this can take months or even years.

Also, we are film makers ourselves, so we do have plans to produce content for the platform, but first we want to get the streaming platform and the Film Market Place up and running.

How sure are you that other film makers and producers and etc. would bite this kind of project most especially those who are already established in the industry? would it be possible for them to take chances in the crypto world when in fact they are already there?

I'm not familiar with the film industry but they wrote earlier that even for established film makers it's sometimes difficult to get the last 15-20% of the film budget financed. If this is the case then also for them Cryptoflix could be interesting for gap financing.


I don't understand why it would be that difficult to get the last 15-20% financed. Lending money is a very profitable business, and if the proper lending contract is put in place, it is virtually guaranteed passive income.

Movies can flop big time. funding a movie is a risky investment. There's no guarantee that a broader audience will care for what you consider a brilliant movie. I assume it's a hit or miss game.

True, streaming service is to de-risk it. As we all know Movies that doesn't do well sometimes are a big hit at the small screen.
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
Active Trading on EPIC5k and Spectre.Ai
hey guys, on Monday morning the CEO Christian will be doing a recorded AMA with me.

Please type questions here and we will get to them in our AMA.

Please tag #AMA so I can find them easily.

Thanks!
full member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 166
I would prefer they have not only different quality with different prices but also different audio streams so I can watch in original or in translation

i think that depend from the producer of the movie mainly, wish they are going to be available in here as well
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
I would prefer they have not only different quality with different prices but also different audio streams so I can watch in original or in translation
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Are there already some potential film maker or so who want to realize some movies or series through Cryptoflix?

thats a good question! any cooperations upcoming? maybe even with a filmstudio itself? this would be awesome!

no they can buy license for established series that's enough for the beginning.

I'm telling again, just what Netflix did, at the start good ild known movies and tv series, now they're adding more and more own productions

It was actually a temporary start strategy for Netflix, they used hits that brought users to gain fame, paid little for it and raised funds around the world for a platform of most of their own successes. But I find it difficult to follow this same pattern in Cryptoflix, will walk a little different ways to achieve World Success
I finally remembered where I saw Netflix logo - in the series "Black Mirror", I want to say that this series, albeit low-budget, but it's become very popular in short time by reason of genre's originality! I think this can happen with Cryptoflix platform - It's nice to see when talented filmmakers disclose their potential and become world famous.

With the help of cryptoflix there will be more and more talented people especially in film industry will arise.
The more platforms there are the more ways there will be to create films. I think that benefits us all.
sr. member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 252
Are there already some potential film maker or so who want to realize some movies or series through Cryptoflix?

thats a good question! any cooperations upcoming? maybe even with a filmstudio itself? this would be awesome!

no they can buy license for established series that's enough for the beginning.

I'm telling again, just what Netflix did, at the start good ild known movies and tv series, now they're adding more and more own productions

It was actually a temporary start strategy for Netflix, they used hits that brought users to gain fame, paid little for it and raised funds around the world for a platform of most of their own successes. But I find it difficult to follow this same pattern in Cryptoflix, will walk a little different ways to achieve World Success
I finally remembered where I saw Netflix logo - in the series "Black Mirror", I want to say that this series, albeit low-budget, but it's become very popular in short time by reason of genre's originality! I think this can happen with Cryptoflix platform - It's nice to see when talented filmmakers disclose their potential and become world famous.

With the help of cryptoflix there will be more and more talented people especially in film industry will arise.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
Are there already some potential film maker or so who want to realize some movies or series through Cryptoflix?

Not formal agreements yet, but we believe our offering is extremely attractive to film makers. Our aim is to help top quality film producers, sales agents, distributors and other film industry players to achieve funding for their projects, while at the same time offer the FLIX token holders the opportunity to act as financiers to enable them to achieve a return on the transaction. CRYPTOFLIX will be different than the existing platforms in that it will be possible to use the platform without a credit card (by using FLIX Tokens) and we will have more flexibility for the content owners in that the minimum quality requirements for entry onto the platform will be lower than the minimum standards for iTunes etc. and also our pricing structure will be more flexible. Also we can use smart contracts to share the revenue instantly with the content owners - in the current platforms this can take months or even years.

Also, we are film makers ourselves, so we do have plans to produce content for the platform, but first we want to get the streaming platform and the Film Market Place up and running.

How sure are you that other film makers and producers and etc. would bite this kind of project most especially those who are already established in the industry? would it be possible for them to take chances in the crypto world when in fact they are already there?

I'm not familiar with the film industry but they wrote earlier that even for established film makers it's sometimes difficult to get the last 15-20% of the film budget financed. If this is the case then also for them Cryptoflix could be interesting for gap financing.


I don't understand why it would be that difficult to get the last 15-20% financed. Lending money is a very profitable business, and if the proper lending contract is put in place, it is virtually guaranteed passive income.

Movies can flop big time. funding a movie is a risky investment. There's no guarantee that a broader audience will care for what you consider a brilliant movie. I assume it's a hit or miss game.
full member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 166
Are there already some potential film maker or so who want to realize some movies or series through Cryptoflix?

thats a good question! any cooperations upcoming? maybe even with a filmstudio itself? this would be awesome!

no they can buy license for established series that's enough for the beginning.

I'm telling again, just what Netflix did, at the start good ild known movies and tv series, now they're adding more and more own productions

It was actually a temporary start strategy for Netflix, they used hits that brought users to gain fame, paid little for it and raised funds around the world for a platform of most of their own successes. But I find it difficult to follow this same pattern in Cryptoflix, will walk a little different ways to achieve World Success
I finally remembered where I saw Netflix logo - in the series "Black Mirror", I want to say that this series, albeit low-budget, but it's become very popular in short time by reason of genre's originality! I think this can happen with Cryptoflix platform - It's nice to see when talented filmmakers disclose their potential and become world famous.

the last season was actually directed by big names already but it was mostly unknown in the begin
Jump to: