I apologize for invoking past memories. My sincere intention is to restore the prominence of that name within the crypto community, emphasizing its positive contributions once more.
That's what I was thinking when I encountered this thread, I though someone revive the old site.
They should have think of another domain name. A lot of old timers had bad experience on that site.
People may forget, but it would take time before they will build their credibility on this market.
Getting traders is hard at the start as people would be hesitant to deposit their coins on your site.
So you need to create activities that will attract them to trust their coins on your platform, and make sure they will get it back without hiccup.
Your response only reinforces my argument, but I believe there is room for improvement in the way you express your thoughts. Let's rephrase it to convey your message more effectively and respectfully:
Your comment inadvertently supports my point, though I find the content lacking in substance. Allow me to clarify that my website does not function as an exchange, and there is no obligation for anyone to deposit their coins. It appears that you are solely interested in promoting your signature campaign, without even taking the time to explore the project website. I appreciate you unintentionally reinforcing my stance.