✅ ✅ [ANN] CryptoTask - 1st Fully Scalable Decentralized Freelancing Market ✅ ✅ - page 61.

spartanrules

sr. member

Activity: 700

Merit: 250

Quote from: costgranda on December 03, 2017, 11:38:56 AM

how can I contact the developers?

here on the forum and maybe on the site there is a link to their mail or telegrams

costgranda

full member

Activity: 476

Merit: 100

how can I contact the developers?

kaltar

sr. member

Activity: 805

Merit: 250

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:35:40 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 11:30:47 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:29:34 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 11:28:22 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:25:24 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 11:24:10 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:20:49 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:15:30 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 10:13:23 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:10:21 AM

I generally do not understand how this principle will be chosen by users who will perform a check of a particular job.

These users are randomly selected from among users of this platform.

Randomly? That is, you can not influence the sample of those who will check the work of freelancers, yes?

Well, yes, it should work this way. And what?

Is this somehow possible to converse? I think there can be different situations that will harm the project.

What do you mean? Huh

For example, the downloader or the freelancer himself can negotiate with those who will check the work so that they make the decision that either side will tell them. How to be in this situation?

You mean bribe?

Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about!

It's impossible! The system works on the basis of a smart contract, if I'm not mistaken. And everything is automated. None of the parties to this transaction has contacts of other participants. Therefore, they can not agree in any way. or it will be incredibly difficult to do. And besides, such a scheme is easily identified and all the perpetrators will be banned in the system. so this is unlikely! Wink

Well, I hope this will work just like this

Seidr

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 107

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 11:33:45 AM

Quote from: Seidr on December 03, 2017, 11:30:05 AM

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 11:28:45 AM

Quote from: Seidr on December 03, 2017, 11:26:53 AM

Hmm... About Whitepaper..
It seemed too strange to me!

What did you find strange?

This is too difficult for the average user!

I do not understand you, I see nothing complicated!

To explain the operation of their algorithm, they use complex mathematical terms, functions, and formulas. It is very hard for me to understand how this works and what it is. I'm not very good at this area.

Sakiri4

sr. member

Activity: 616

Merit: 250

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 11:30:47 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:29:34 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 11:28:22 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:25:24 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 11:24:10 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:20:49 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:15:30 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 10:13:23 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:10:21 AM

I generally do not understand how this principle will be chosen by users who will perform a check of a particular job.

These users are randomly selected from among users of this platform.

Randomly? That is, you can not influence the sample of those who will check the work of freelancers, yes?

Well, yes, it should work this way. And what?

Is this somehow possible to converse? I think there can be different situations that will harm the project.

What do you mean? Huh

For example, the downloader or the freelancer himself can negotiate with those who will check the work so that they make the decision that either side will tell them. How to be in this situation?

You mean bribe?

Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about!

It's impossible! The system works on the basis of a smart contract, if I'm not mistaken. And everything is automated. None of the parties to this transaction has contacts of other participants. Therefore, they can not agree in any way. or it will be incredibly difficult to do. And besides, such a scheme is easily identified and all the perpetrators will be banned in the system. so this is unlikely! Wink

DarkPunk

member

Activity: 182

Merit: 10

Quote from: Seidr on December 03, 2017, 11:30:05 AM

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 11:28:45 AM

Quote from: Seidr on December 03, 2017, 11:26:53 AM

Hmm... About Whitepaper..
It seemed too strange to me!

What did you find strange?

This is too difficult for the average user!

I do not understand you, I see nothing complicated!

kaltar

sr. member

Activity: 805

Merit: 250

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:29:34 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 11:28:22 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:25:24 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 11:24:10 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:20:49 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:15:30 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 10:13:23 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:10:21 AM

I generally do not understand how this principle will be chosen by users who will perform a check of a particular job.

These users are randomly selected from among users of this platform.

Randomly? That is, you can not influence the sample of those who will check the work of freelancers, yes?

Well, yes, it should work this way. And what?

Is this somehow possible to converse? I think there can be different situations that will harm the project.

What do you mean? Huh

For example, the downloader or the freelancer himself can negotiate with those who will check the work so that they make the decision that either side will tell them. How to be in this situation?

You mean bribe?

Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about!

Seidr

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 107

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 11:28:45 AM

Quote from: Seidr on December 03, 2017, 11:26:53 AM

Hmm... About Whitepaper..
It seemed too strange to me!

What did you find strange?

This is too difficult for the average user!

Sakiri4

sr. member

Activity: 616

Merit: 250

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 11:28:22 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:25:24 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 11:24:10 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:20:49 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:15:30 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 10:13:23 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:10:21 AM

I generally do not understand how this principle will be chosen by users who will perform a check of a particular job.

These users are randomly selected from among users of this platform.

Randomly? That is, you can not influence the sample of those who will check the work of freelancers, yes?

Well, yes, it should work this way. And what?

Is this somehow possible to converse? I think there can be different situations that will harm the project.

What do you mean? Huh

For example, the downloader or the freelancer himself can negotiate with those who will check the work so that they make the decision that either side will tell them. How to be in this situation?

You mean bribe?

DarkPunk

member

Activity: 182

Merit: 10

Quote from: Seidr on December 03, 2017, 11:26:53 AM

Hmm... About Whitepaper..
It seemed too strange to me!

What did you find strange?

kaltar

sr. member

Activity: 805

Merit: 250

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:25:24 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 11:24:10 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:20:49 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:15:30 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 10:13:23 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:10:21 AM

I generally do not understand how this principle will be chosen by users who will perform a check of a particular job.

These users are randomly selected from among users of this platform.

Randomly? That is, you can not influence the sample of those who will check the work of freelancers, yes?

Well, yes, it should work this way. And what?

Is this somehow possible to converse? I think there can be different situations that will harm the project.

What do you mean? Huh

For example, the downloader or the freelancer himself can negotiate with those who will check the work so that they make the decision that either side will tell them. How to be in this situation?

Seidr

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 107

Hmm... About Whitepaper..
It seemed too strange to me!

Sakiri4

sr. member

Activity: 616

Merit: 250

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 11:24:10 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:20:49 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:15:30 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 10:13:23 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:10:21 AM

I generally do not understand how this principle will be chosen by users who will perform a check of a particular job.

These users are randomly selected from among users of this platform.

Randomly? That is, you can not influence the sample of those who will check the work of freelancers, yes?

Well, yes, it should work this way. And what?

Is this somehow possible to converse? I think there can be different situations that will harm the project.

What do you mean? Huh

copyfile

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 251

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 11:23:02 AM

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:16:29 AM

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 10:14:29 AM

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:11:38 AM

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 10:09:38 AM

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:06:32 AM

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 10:05:07 AM

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:03:52 AM

I think the developers need to work on the whitepaper

Huh

What's wrong with that?

Did you see this? It's no good.

Yes, I read this. And I do not understand what exactly does not suit you. Why do you think that this is not good

It is issued terribly! All the information is just piled up and it does not look like a good presentation of a project of this level.

Does it matter? Really?
Whitepaper is primarily a document, and what's important is contained in this document, is not it?

This is important, I do not argue with this. But information needs to be well represented, this is also an important factor!

I saw many different projects, and many of the WP were decorated beautifully and colorfully, but no important information in themselves was not carried. Therefore, I believe that it is better to let wp contain all the necessary details, but it will be devoid of design!

Maybe you're right, that makes sense

kaltar

sr. member

Activity: 805

Merit: 250

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 11:20:49 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:15:30 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 10:13:23 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:10:21 AM

I generally do not understand how this principle will be chosen by users who will perform a check of a particular job.

These users are randomly selected from among users of this platform.

Randomly? That is, you can not influence the sample of those who will check the work of freelancers, yes?

Well, yes, it should work this way. And what?

Is this somehow possible to converse? I think there can be different situations that will harm the project.

DarkPunk

member

Activity: 182

Merit: 10

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:16:29 AM

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 10:14:29 AM

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:11:38 AM

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 10:09:38 AM

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:06:32 AM

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 10:05:07 AM

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:03:52 AM

I think the developers need to work on the whitepaper

Huh

What's wrong with that?

Did you see this? It's no good.

Yes, I read this. And I do not understand what exactly does not suit you. Why do you think that this is not good

It is issued terribly! All the information is just piled up and it does not look like a good presentation of a project of this level.

Does it matter? Really?
Whitepaper is primarily a document, and what's important is contained in this document, is not it?

This is important, I do not argue with this. But information needs to be well represented, this is also an important factor!

I saw many different projects, and many of the WP were decorated beautifully and colorfully, but no important information in themselves was not carried. Therefore, I believe that it is better to let wp contain all the necessary details, but it will be devoid of design!

Sakiri4

sr. member

Activity: 616

Merit: 250

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:15:30 AM

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 10:13:23 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:10:21 AM

I generally do not understand how this principle will be chosen by users who will perform a check of a particular job.

These users are randomly selected from among users of this platform.

Randomly? That is, you can not influence the sample of those who will check the work of freelancers, yes?

Well, yes, it should work this way. And what?

copyfile

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 251

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 10:14:29 AM

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:11:38 AM

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 10:09:38 AM

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:06:32 AM

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 10:05:07 AM

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:03:52 AM

I think the developers need to work on the whitepaper

Huh

What's wrong with that?

Did you see this? It's no good.

Yes, I read this. And I do not understand what exactly does not suit you. Why do you think that this is not good

It is issued terribly! All the information is just piled up and it does not look like a good presentation of a project of this level.

Does it matter? Really?
Whitepaper is primarily a document, and what's important is contained in this document, is not it?

This is important, I do not argue with this. But information needs to be well represented, this is also an important factor!

kaltar

sr. member

Activity: 805

Merit: 250

Quote from: Sakiri4 on December 03, 2017, 10:13:23 AM

Quote from: kaltar on December 03, 2017, 10:10:21 AM

I generally do not understand how this principle will be chosen by users who will perform a check of a particular job.

These users are randomly selected from among users of this platform.

Randomly? That is, you can not influence the sample of those who will check the work of freelancers, yes?

DarkPunk

member

Activity: 182

Merit: 10

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:11:38 AM

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 10:09:38 AM

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:06:32 AM

Quote from: DarkPunk on December 03, 2017, 10:05:07 AM

Quote from: copyfile on December 03, 2017, 10:03:52 AM

I think the developers need to work on the whitepaper

Huh

What's wrong with that?

Did you see this? It's no good.

Yes, I read this. And I do not understand what exactly does not suit you. Why do you think that this is not good

It is issued terribly! All the information is just piled up and it does not look like a good presentation of a project of this level.

Does it matter? Really?
Whitepaper is primarily a document, and what's important is contained in this document, is not it?

Topic: ✅ ✅ [ANN] CryptoTask - 1st Fully Scalable Decentralized Freelancing Market ✅ ✅ - page 61. (Read 47857 times)