Author

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 1098. (Read 3426918 times)

legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null

cudaminer-2013-04-30.zip (3.2 MB)  [1st update for the day: fixed 1D texture limit checking bug for S kernels]
SHA256 sum: 2d81b52e1051a4f724e75b0e84e231293809437aa060d21b2fd3b8bfc5b711f2


Would it be possible to put the source on a site that actually let's you download it, instead of insisting on
that I update my browser? Please?

In addition the site also says "keep the default settings", which seems quite suspicious. I site shouldn't need
specific settings. There are there so I can customize my browsing. One reason for such demands would be
they need to run some code that does things that you most certainly do not want to happen (e. g. virus).

For the record I _am_ using the the latest stable Debian provides, so there is no update.
no, some ppl like to help scammers/liers (owner of mega) because they think the service is good. actually all those didnt understand why HTTP got invented and how to use it Tongue
nvm, im just kidding (everything expect scammers/liers part). hes a win developer so this is above averge, normal win devs dont publish anything or prop, its rarely src too and also extreme rarely on git/http/similiar.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
Would it be possible to put the source on a site that actually let's you download it, instead of insisting on
that I update my browser? Please?

For the record I _am_ using the the latest stable Debian provides, so there is no update.

Firefox 17.0.3 ESR here on an ancient Ubuntu 9.04. Latest flash plugin installed. Downloads just fine.

Alternatively go to github to get cudaMiner. The version there is almost up to date.


newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0

cudaminer-2013-04-30.zip (3.2 MB)  [1st update for the day: fixed 1D texture limit checking bug for S kernels]
SHA256 sum: 2d81b52e1051a4f724e75b0e84e231293809437aa060d21b2fd3b8bfc5b711f2


Would it be possible to put the source on a site that actually let's you download it, instead of insisting on
that I update my browser? Please?

In addition the site also says "keep the default settings", which seems quite suspicious. I site shouldn't need
specific settings. There are there so I can customize my browsing. One reason for such demands would be
they need to run some code that does things that you most certainly do not want to happen (e. g. virus).

For the record I _am_ using the the latest stable Debian provides, so there is no update.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
what settings did you use ?

just now I am using this config on my 660Ti with 3GB of RAM

-i 0 -C 2 -m 1 -l S56x8

This gives 172-174 kHash/s and with slight overclocking this can be raised to 186 kHash/s

this config requires 56*8*4MB = 1792 MB of available memory on the card.

hero member
Activity: 516
Merit: 500
CAT.EX Exchange
Just emptied my wallet to keep you motivated    Smiley

Let me make a wish: get stratumn implemented. Using the proxy causes a loss of hashpower due to stales rate ( 5%-10% at different pools).
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
some of you have noticed an increase in speed by opening the browser? ? happens to me with chrome version 26.0.1410.64 m, up from 118 kh / s to 132 kh / s. and ' normal this thing ? ? hello

Are you running cudaminer with -i 0 ?

Christian


no! -i 1
sr. member
Activity: 247
Merit: 250
Interesting. I have a PC where I can run a 660Ti with 186kHash/s (after slight OC) just fine. Windows 7, 32 bit there. I will dig out my launch config later.

No special handling of UEFI, as my code doesn't interface with any APIs that go that deep. It sits on top of the CUDA runtime APIs and that is supposed to shield me from low level stuff like that.


what settings did you use ?

All I can get at the moment is 170kHash/s max, I did use -l 42x8 and it gave me 1034kHash though something went wrong as my gpu was still idle. While I like this program I think the new version is a little bit unstable, so I had to switch to the old version.

Anytime you switch versions you must autotune the first time. The old version's configuration could now be an incorrect one for your system
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
Interesting. I have a PC where I can run a 660Ti with 186kHash/s (after slight OC) just fine. Windows 7, 32 bit there. I will dig out my launch config later.

No special handling of UEFI, as my code doesn't interface with any APIs that go that deep. It sits on top of the CUDA runtime APIs and that is supposed to shield me from low level stuff like that.


what settings did you use ?

All I can get at the moment is 170kHash/s max, I did use -l 42x8 and it gave me 1034kHash though something went wrong as my gpu was still idle. While I like this program I think the new version is a little bit unstable, so I had to switch to the old version.
sr. member
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
Does anyone have a Step by Step manual to install Cudaminer on an Ubuntu System ?


best regards
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
I'll throw a stick in the cgminer thread, you never know Wink
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
Are there plans to get this into cgminer? Smiley

Not from my side. The stuff is open source, fork it, spoon it, do whatever you like Wink
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Are there plans to get this into cgminer? Smiley
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
Interesting. I have a PC where I can run a 660Ti with 186kHash/s (after slight OC) just fine. Windows 7, 32 bit there. I will dig out my launch config later.

No special handling of UEFI, as my code doesn't interface with any APIs that go that deep. It sits on top of the CUDA runtime APIs and that is supposed to shield me from low level stuff like that.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
sorry to say but the latest releases dont work as well as the 17-04 version.

The card (GTX 660 Ti) does not run as fast AND gives "Result does not validate on CPU" whenever i use a later version then 17-04.

tried all kinds of configs and i will stay with 17-04 version @ 160 kH/s with flags -i 0 -C 2 -m 1 -l 70x4. This same config runs awfull with the new versions.

I'm using win8 64 bit with the Nvidia 314.22 drivers.

Now i am wondering about UEFI systems that have a UEFI graphics BIOS (the windows 8 secure boot thingy), did you take these systems in consideration ??

Or should there be no problem at all with any kind of GPU bioses ?

Greetings


edit: sorry forgot to mention the cards clock speeds : core @ 1058 mem @ 6008 wich are stockspeeds. sometimes goes to corespeed of 1071 thereabout, regulated by nvidiaboost. no oc'ing.
        its an ASUS GTX 660 Ti 2gig standard model DC2
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
some of you have noticed an increase in speed by opening the browser? ? happens to me with chrome version 26.0.1410.64 m, up from 118 kh / s to 132 kh / s. and ' normal this thing ? ? hello

Are you running cudaminer with -i 0 ?

Christian
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
some of you have noticed an increase in speed by opening the browser? ? happens to me with chrome version 26.0.1410.64 m, up from 118 kh / s to 132 kh / s. and ' normal this thing ? ? hello
sr. member
Activity: 369
Merit: 250
I've been getting some BSOD when i run the latest version for a while. Not sure if it's cudaminer or something else but just figured i'd post to see if anyone else was getting them?
I'm getting them too, not sure if its cause graphic card is working too hard or cause of the miner. Using gtx 570.
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
I've been getting some BSOD when i run the latest version for a while. Not sure if it's cudaminer or something else but just figured i'd post to see if anyone else was getting them?

Not here.

What are your system specs?
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
I've been getting some BSOD when i run the latest version for a while. Not sure if it's cudaminer or something else but just figured i'd post to see if anyone else was getting them?
Jump to: