[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 138.

polanskiman

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Quote from: Ignition75 on August 29, 2014, 02:43:34 AM

Quote from: polanskiman on August 29, 2014, 02:26:44 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Memclock matters a LOT when mining other algos like CryptoNight, though. I have mine at 1450/7000, usually.

I wrongly assumed it was XCN. He is mining X11.

Yes I realised that, it's all good brother. I went + 650 memclock because I was following a guide: http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoinmining/comments/20734u/5x_nvidia_750_ti_evga_rig_with_mods/

I got stability with +125/+200, but it's an uninspiring 2.75 Mh/s.

Is that it? Tweak over?

No staying up until 5am for the next week playing with thread count/thread concurrency/lookup gap/core/mem/vddc combinations Huh

Yes that's about it on NVIDIA. No need for all that shit TC, LG bla bla bla.

2.75 Mh/s seems about right for X11. Don't forget though you are only pumping 60w / card.

Here is my hash for x11. I launched an instance just for the sake of it:

GES

sr. member

Activity: 315

Merit: 250

Quote from: Amph on August 27, 2014, 05:25:47 AM

Quote from: th00ber on August 27, 2014, 05:14:28 AM

Quote from: Amph on August 27, 2014, 01:34:58 AM

Quote from: GES on August 26, 2014, 11:37:51 PM

Quote from: bigjme on August 21, 2014, 09:17:43 AM

i would say the 2cm is the issue, i have over 5cm between my cards, and here are my temps from no card infront, to 2 cards infront

40'c

45'c

55'c

38'c

your tamb? it make the big difference

I'm between 45-50°c on my 750ti, It works great for 4 months

PS : I sold all my 7950 (x7) to buy 750ti

no i mean ambient temperature= tamb Grin

15-20'c

Ignition75

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

www.dashpay.io

Quote from: polanskiman on August 29, 2014, 02:26:44 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Memclock matters a LOT when mining other algos like CryptoNight, though. I have mine at 1450/7000, usually.

I wrongly assumed it was XCN. He is mining X11.

Yes I realised that, it's all good brother. I went + 650 memclock because I was following a guide: http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoinmining/comments/20734u/5x_nvidia_750_ti_evga_rig_with_mods/

I got stability with +125/+200, but it's an uninspiring 2.75 Mh/s.

Is that it? Tweak over?

No staying up until 5am for the next week playing with thread count/thread concurrency/lookup gap/core/mem/vddc combinations Huh

GES

sr. member

Activity: 315

Merit: 250

Quote from: Amph on August 27, 2014, 01:34:58 AM

Quote from: GES on August 26, 2014, 11:37:51 PM

Quote from: bigjme on August 21, 2014, 09:17:43 AM

i would say the 2cm is the issue, i have over 5cm between my cards, and here are my temps from no card infront, to 2 cards infront

40'c

45'c

55'c

38'c

your tamb? it make the big difference

what is such tamb?
I from Russia, not understand everything

polanskiman

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Memclock matters a LOT when mining other algos like CryptoNight, though. I have mine at 1450/7000, usually.

I wrongly assumed it was XCN. He is mining X11.

polanskiman

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Quote from: yellowduck2 on August 29, 2014, 02:17:33 AM

Quote from: Ignition75 on August 29, 2014, 02:15:42 AM

Quote from: polanskiman on August 29, 2014, 02:06:55 AM

You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.5 of djm34 Wink

- Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your card to their default factory values. Wink

The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change.

Look at djm having her own miner and not giving it me when she knew my cards landed yesterday! I'll take that one offline lol.

OK I'll reflash the stock bios and hunt around for djm's miner. Thanks Tongue

Her ?

He went through a tough operation lately Tongue

polanskiman

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Quote from: Ignition75 on August 29, 2014, 02:15:42 AM

Quote from: polanskiman on August 29, 2014, 02:06:55 AM

You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.5 of djm34 Wink

- Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your card to their default factory values. Wink

The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change.

Look at djm having her own miner and not giving it me when she knew my cards landed yesterday! I'll take that one offline lol.

OK I'll reflash the stock bios and hunt around for djm's miner. Thanks Tongue

I just realised you were mining X11. Sorry I assumed it was XCN. I think your hashrate is about right. Perhaps others could confirm.

yellowduck2

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Ignition75 on August 29, 2014, 02:15:42 AM

Quote from: polanskiman on August 29, 2014, 02:06:55 AM

You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.5 of djm34 Wink

- Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your card to their default factory values. Wink

The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change.

Look at djm having her own miner and not giving it me when she knew my cards landed yesterday! I'll take that one offline lol.

OK I'll reflash the stock bios and hunt around for djm's miner. Thanks Tongue

Her ?

Ignition75

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

www.dashpay.io

Quote from: polanskiman on August 29, 2014, 02:06:55 AM

You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.5 of djm34 Wink

- Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your card to their default factory values. Wink

The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change.

Look at djm having her own miner and not giving it me when she knew my cards landed yesterday! I'll take that one offline lol.

OK I'll reflash the stock bios and hunt around for djm's miner. Thanks Tongue

polanskiman

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Quote from: Ignition75 on August 29, 2014, 01:29:28 AM

So I converted my first AMD rig to Nvidia

Each card, GA Black, is sitting on circa 2.6 Mh/s x11, time to ramp things up a little Grin

What's my best plan of attack for NVIDIA?

I've flashed a new bios with edited high watermarks of 65500 for power, went +100 Core and +650 Mem, each card hovered around 2.8 Mh/s then I got instability.

Is there a better way to approach it?

Cheers lads.

You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.6 released by djm34 - Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your cards to their default factory values.

The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card so it's to you to find the sweet spot. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change.

Here is my hash:

I really don't understand why people try flashing their cards before trying the basics first and then complain about low hashrates.

Ignition75

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

www.dashpay.io

So I converted my first AMD rig to Nvidia

Went from this:

To this, so cute lol :

Each card, GA Black, is sitting on circa 2.6 Mh/s x11, time to ramp things up a little Grin

What's my best plan of attack for NVIDIA?

I've flashed a new bios with edited high watermarks of 65500 for power, went +100 Core and +650 Mem, each card hovered around 2.8 Mh/s then I got instability.

Is there a better way to approach it?

Here's what I'm playing with:

Cheers lads.

polanskiman

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Quote from: Travis9x on August 28, 2014, 01:43:51 PM

Quote from: djm34 on August 28, 2014, 11:44:34 AM

that's because you don't know where to search and don't read the thread (and also that I am to lazzy to update bigjme website)

Read the thread…1004 pages…yeah… -_-

There is a search function you know, at the top right hand corner....

polanskiman

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Quote from: Ignition75 on August 28, 2014, 10:13:14 AM

Quote from: djm34 on August 28, 2014, 09:57:46 AM

rather cool the new version of msi AB, it is now possible to arrange the graph on several columns (mask half of the screen... but hey...)

Hey dude, ccminer is fairly basic on the data, is there something similar to sgminer for nvidia?

Look at splitscreen. Basic data but more data than ccminer/nvminer.

jk_14

legendary

Activity: 1292

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Ignition75 on August 28, 2014, 11:14:23 AM

So how do I keep an eye on all the things I'm used to with sgminer? Or do I have to dump windows for something like PiMP to get the same level of stats?

try this:

https://i.imgur.com/kIdDdS3.png
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=16800.0

go6ooo1212

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

quarkchain.io

Lol , its pritty good work. I wish the price didnt crash so much. Hope there'll be some more interest for rising it...

go6ooo1212

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

quarkchain.io

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: djm34 on August 28, 2014, 08:24:37 AM

xcn with 780ti 13.4MH/s

Cracked 5.5MH/s average on 750Ti, but not 5.5 at lowest point yet: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/xcnwolf750ti12.png

Which values of gpu and mem frequencys 😊

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: Travis9x on August 28, 2014, 01:43:51 PM

Quote from: djm34 on August 28, 2014, 11:44:34 AM

that's because you don't know where to search and don't read the thread (and also that I am to lazzy to update bigjme website)

Read the thread…1004 pages…yeah… -_-

especially when you could find the info on the last 5 pages.... Roll Eyes

I know that the crypto market isn't going well, but this is still about making money, so it makes me wonder why people can't make the effort to search the information they need. Grin

Travis9x

full member

Activity: 170

Merit: 100

Quote from: djm34 on August 28, 2014, 11:44:34 AM

that's because you don't know where to search and don't read the thread (and also that I am to lazzy to update bigjme website)

Read the thread…1004 pages…yeah… -_-

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Ok, well the website will be going down for about 20 minutes while i remove some cards sooo yeh, be right back

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: bigjme on August 28, 2014, 11:50:58 AM

Quote from: djm34 on August 28, 2014, 11:44:34 AM

that's because you don't know where to search and don't read the thread (and also that I am to lazzy to update bigjme website)

We knew that already Wink

I know

there should be a new update for xcn, I will use the occasion to update my page

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 138. (Read 3426930 times)