[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 296.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: Neo.op on June 27, 2014, 12:34:52 PM

Quote from: djm34 on June 27, 2014, 10:58:41 AM

it works

(good luck compiling though...)
(in my first attemp the two uint32 wasn't in the right order...)

gpu usage stable around 78 (not good but better than yesterday)
speed: 2.9Mhash/s (2 instance gives between 3-3.2MHash/s) with the killer groestl version.

I will release as is (meaning it runs with -a x13... adding new option, is clearly the part I hate... and I don't know well ccminer interface)

(less than 5minutes of change over 3 hours of compilation Roll Eyes

)

edit: I have no idea on how to make it work on linux...

where are the codes located? I'll give it a try on linux and see if it compiles through.

sorry not available yet

Neo.op

sr. member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 254

Quote from: djm34 on June 27, 2014, 10:58:41 AM

it works

(good luck compiling though...)
(in my first attemp the two uint32 wasn't in the right order...)

gpu usage stable around 78 (not good but better than yesterday)
speed: 2.9Mhash/s (2 instance gives between 3-3.2MHash/s) with the killer groestl version.

I will release as is (meaning it runs with -a x13... adding new option, is clearly the part I hate... and I don't know well ccminer interface)

(less than 5minutes of change over 3 hours of compilation Roll Eyes

)

edit: I have no idea on how to make it work on linux...

where are the codes located? I'll give it a try on linux and see if it compiles through.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: Amph on June 27, 2014, 11:06:39 AM

Quote from: djm34 on June 27, 2014, 10:58:41 AM

it works

(good luck compiling though...)
(in my first attemp the two uint32 wasn't in the right order...)

gpu usage stable around 78 (not good but better than yesterday)
speed: 2.9Mhash/s (2 instance gives between 3-3.2MHash/s) with the killer groestl version.

I will release as is (meaning it runs with -a x13... adding new option, is clearly the part I hate... and I don't know well ccminer interface)

(less than 5minutes of change over 3 hours of compilation Roll Eyes

)

you just added the two .c/.cu file and changed two line of code?

If you can find the two cu anywhere let me know (I haven't used the piece of code I "traded", as it would have required a lot more work actually to insert it into ccminer)... you still have to write them (was two days ago... though...)
5min (over the last few changes... Roll Eyes

once I have found how get something in and out of the shared memory)

as it may takes a little while before I get the source out, I put here the windows binaries (it still runs with -x13, though I will try to fix that).
It is compiled from the killer groestl version with only one executable:

https://mega.co.nz/#!IUsXGBoZ!fMJQK_BG2x6GAyhX_oaD_cmurLD7-4oB4B2Cys5Qh-o

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: djm34 on June 27, 2014, 10:58:41 AM

it works

(good luck compiling though...)
(in my first attemp the two uint32 wasn't in the right order...)

gpu usage stable around 78 (not good but better than yesterday)
speed: 2.9Mhash/s (2 instance gives between 3-3.2MHash/s) with the killer groestl version.

I will release as is (meaning it runs with -a x13... adding new option, is clearly the part I hate... and I don't know well ccminer interface)

(less than 5minutes of change over 3 hours of compilation Roll Eyes

)

you just added the two .c/.cu file and changed two line of code?

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

it works

(good luck compiling though...)
(in my first attemp the two uint32 wasn't in the right order...)

gpu usage stable around 78 (not good but better than yesterday)
speed: 2.9Mhash/s (2 instance gives between 3-3.2MHash/s) with the killer groestl version.

I will release as is (meaning it runs with -a x13... adding new option, is clearly the part I hate... and I don't know well ccminer interface)

(less than 5minutes of change over 3 hours of compilation Roll Eyes

)

edit: I have no idea on how to make it work on linux...

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

A compile over 10 minutes is a bad one i think

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

still compiling... each mistake cost a lot at the moment... (it wasn't that bad yesterday...)

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

like this

Code:

uint32 a = 0xff00ff00;
uint32 b = 0x00ff00ff;

ulong64 c = ((ulong64)a) << 32 | b;

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: bigjme on June 27, 2014, 09:30:55 AM

Is there a way to split it into 2 and merge it later?

I did that yesterday, ended up with new uint32_t tables of 512 numbers (instead of 256 uint64_t)... it divided ~~the computing time~~ the hashrate by two...
right know, the shared memory seems to split them automatically, just needs to merge them.

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Is there a way to split it into 2 and merge it later?

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: bigjme on June 27, 2014, 09:25:00 AM

Do the intergers need to be that long?

whirlpool uses tables of uint64_t, the shared memory doesn't seem to take more than uint32_t...
(and I don't know enough to modify a lot the algo)

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Do the intergers need to be that long?

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

the compiler doesn't like MAKE_ULONGLONG,

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: djm34 on June 27, 2014, 08:09:57 AM

lol, I have entered compilation of doom.... for some reason cicc.exe is compiling since half an hour and use almost 2Gb of ram

too much loop unrolling causes that, also for some algorithms going below 80 registers per thread also causes these issues.

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Strange. If you watch the compile directory size does it keep increasing?

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: bigjme on June 27, 2014, 08:39:49 AM

Hmm, there was in issue like that in ccminer for 64 bit.
Which version are you compiling?

right now, I am compiling in 32bit (the pre X13 release, without killer groestl... for the wrong reason I must precise)

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Hmm, there was in issue like that in ccminer for 64 bit.
Which version are you compiling?

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: bigjme on June 27, 2014, 08:11:37 AM

Yeh i use to get some like that, just cancel it and start again

still compiling... (I did restart though...) the compiler really doesn't like what I put in whirlpool Grin

(obviously it is where it is stuck... and I will have to recompile as it will just run over one thread...)

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Yeh i use to get some like that, just cancel it and start again

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

lol, I have entered compilation of doom.... for some reason cicc.exe is compiling since half an hour and use almost 2Gb of ram

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 296. (Read 3426976 times)