Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 439. (Read 3426941 times)
May 22, 2014, 11:26:51 AM
It would be awesome to include their donation addresses for easy look ups and help people get donating to them.
May 22, 2014, 11:18:36 AM
Gotcha. Def hashrate per algo would be nice.
May 22, 2014, 11:12:56 AM
that was the intention. But cudaminers.net is a forum, its not a "this site only has information" sort of things.
cudamining.cc wont cost anything to build, other then the $5 or so that leofur paid
cudamining.cc wont cost anything to build, other then the $5 or so that leofur paid
May 22, 2014, 11:09:08 AM
may-be once we'll have seen it... for the moment all good 
Right now this is what will most likely be included;
About page, explaining about the 2 miners and a little about both christians maybe?
Tutorials - compiling, nicehash etc
A releases page
A sample config page
Maybe a table of performance on different algo's for different cards?
So what purpose does cudamining.cc serve and what purpose does cudaminers.net serve? Not trying to rain on anyone's parade but wouldn't it make more sense to have 1 site for all things cuda/ccminer?
May 22, 2014, 10:53:47 AM
may-be once we'll have seen it... for the moment all good
Right now this is what will most likely be included;
About page, explaining about the 2 miners and a little about both christians maybe?
Tutorials - compiling, nicehash etc
A releases page
A sample config page
Maybe a table of performance on different algo's for different cards?
May 22, 2014, 10:51:32 AM
no way in hell i will get involved with this nvidia garbage ever again..
See yah!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O83vd0l-_Ew
May 22, 2014, 10:47:35 AM
I do believe this has been answered but want to confirm.
I am using ccminer 1.1 and have 2 rigs. They each have 5 gtx750ti's. Rig A is using an Amd x1100T (6 core) processor and it stays at 9,200 kh/s. But Rig B has an Amd X3 (3 core) processor and it starts at 9,100 kh/s but fluctuates all over the place from there. It has dropped to 5,400 kh/s and now staying in the 7,800 range. That processor runs fron 40-60 usage. I can restart the bat and everything starts back in the 9,100 range. Do I need a stronger processor for rig B? I ahve them on the same Nvidia driver so I think I eliminated that as a culprit.
you should monitor the parameters of the cards and see if anything funny happensI am using ccminer 1.1 and have 2 rigs. They each have 5 gtx750ti's. Rig A is using an Amd x1100T (6 core) processor and it stays at 9,200 kh/s. But Rig B has an Amd X3 (3 core) processor and it starts at 9,100 kh/s but fluctuates all over the place from there. It has dropped to 5,400 kh/s and now staying in the 7,800 range. That processor runs fron 40-60 usage. I can restart the bat and everything starts back in the 9,100 range. Do I need a stronger processor for rig B? I ahve them on the same Nvidia driver so I think I eliminated that as a culprit.
Not sure what you mean by monitor parameters.
May 22, 2014, 10:45:57 AM
cudamining.cc is being worked on guys. Are there any request for features we want?
may-be once we'll have seen it... for the moment all good May 22, 2014, 10:41:03 AM
cudamining.cc is being worked on guys. Are there any request for features we want?
May 22, 2014, 10:22:43 AM
I do believe this has been answered but want to confirm.
I am using ccminer 1.1 and have 2 rigs. They each have 5 gtx750ti's. Rig A is using an Amd x1100T (6 core) processor and it stays at 9,200 kh/s. But Rig B has an Amd X3 (3 core) processor and it starts at 9,100 kh/s but fluctuates all over the place from there. It has dropped to 5,400 kh/s and now staying in the 7,800 range. That processor runs fron 40-60 usage. I can restart the bat and everything starts back in the 9,100 range. Do I need a stronger processor for rig B? I ahve them on the same Nvidia driver so I think I eliminated that as a culprit.
I am using ccminer 1.1 and have 2 rigs. They each have 5 gtx750ti's. Rig A is using an Amd x1100T (6 core) processor and it stays at 9,200 kh/s. But Rig B has an Amd X3 (3 core) processor and it starts at 9,100 kh/s but fluctuates all over the place from there. It has dropped to 5,400 kh/s and now staying in the 7,800 range. That processor runs fron 40-60 usage. I can restart the bat and everything starts back in the 9,100 range. Do I need a stronger processor for rig B? I ahve them on the same Nvidia driver so I think I eliminated that as a culprit.
i read somewhere that amd MB with nvidia card is not good, it make some straneg hash dropping, especially with maxwell tecnology
other guy on overclock.net have this problem
May 22, 2014, 10:07:17 AM
Is there a way for a windows ccminer to use an equivalent of --syslog parameter ?
I just want to get the output in a file under my windows desktop to have a script that check the hashrate of my card.
Anyone has a solution ?
I just want to get the output in a file under my windows desktop to have a script that check the hashrate of my card.
Anyone has a solution ?
May 22, 2014, 09:56:35 AM
I do believe this has been answered but want to confirm.
I am using ccminer 1.1 and have 2 rigs. They each have 5 gtx750ti's. Rig A is using an Amd x1100T (6 core) processor and it stays at 9,200 kh/s. But Rig B has an Amd X3 (3 core) processor and it starts at 9,100 kh/s but fluctuates all over the place from there. It has dropped to 5,400 kh/s and now staying in the 7,800 range. That processor runs fron 40-60 usage. I can restart the bat and everything starts back in the 9,100 range. Do I need a stronger processor for rig B? I ahve them on the same Nvidia driver so I think I eliminated that as a culprit.
you should monitor the parameters of the cards and see if anything funny happensI am using ccminer 1.1 and have 2 rigs. They each have 5 gtx750ti's. Rig A is using an Amd x1100T (6 core) processor and it stays at 9,200 kh/s. But Rig B has an Amd X3 (3 core) processor and it starts at 9,100 kh/s but fluctuates all over the place from there. It has dropped to 5,400 kh/s and now staying in the 7,800 range. That processor runs fron 40-60 usage. I can restart the bat and everything starts back in the 9,100 range. Do I need a stronger processor for rig B? I ahve them on the same Nvidia driver so I think I eliminated that as a culprit.
Not sure what you mean by monitor parameters.
@cbuchner1
Is the jackpot coin address in readme correct that you have as merge for c&c? If not let me know and I will mine with at hashharder from today until Sunday night for you both. Looks like this one might take off.
May 22, 2014, 09:50:50 AM
Christian thanks for CCMiner, if I was the head of nvidia I would like to give you one of the offices. You are now one of the major contributors to promote theirs products on the market. They owe you.
May 22, 2014, 09:30:29 AM
I do believe this has been answered but want to confirm.
I am using ccminer 1.1 and have 2 rigs. They each have 5 gtx750ti's. Rig A is using an Amd x1100T (6 core) processor and it stays at 9,200 kh/s. But Rig B has an Amd X3 (3 core) processor and it starts at 9,100 kh/s but fluctuates all over the place from there. It has dropped to 5,400 kh/s and now staying in the 7,800 range. That processor runs fron 40-60 usage. I can restart the bat and everything starts back in the 9,100 range. Do I need a stronger processor for rig B? I ahve them on the same Nvidia driver so I think I eliminated that as a culprit.
you should monitor the parameters of the cards and see if anything funny happens I am using ccminer 1.1 and have 2 rigs. They each have 5 gtx750ti's. Rig A is using an Amd x1100T (6 core) processor and it stays at 9,200 kh/s. But Rig B has an Amd X3 (3 core) processor and it starts at 9,100 kh/s but fluctuates all over the place from there. It has dropped to 5,400 kh/s and now staying in the 7,800 range. That processor runs fron 40-60 usage. I can restart the bat and everything starts back in the 9,100 range. Do I need a stronger processor for rig B? I ahve them on the same Nvidia driver so I think I eliminated that as a culprit.
May 22, 2014, 08:40:32 AM
I do believe this has been answered but want to confirm.
I am using ccminer 1.1 and have 2 rigs. They each have 5 gtx750ti's. Rig A is using an Amd x1100T (6 core) processor and it stays at 9,200 kh/s. But Rig B has an Amd X3 (3 core) processor and it starts at 9,100 kh/s but fluctuates all over the place from there. It has dropped to 5,400 kh/s and now staying in the 7,800 range. That processor runs fron 40-60 usage. I can restart the bat and everything starts back in the 9,100 range. Do I need a stronger processor for rig B? I ahve them on the same Nvidia driver so I think I eliminated that as a culprit.
I am using ccminer 1.1 and have 2 rigs. They each have 5 gtx750ti's. Rig A is using an Amd x1100T (6 core) processor and it stays at 9,200 kh/s. But Rig B has an Amd X3 (3 core) processor and it starts at 9,100 kh/s but fluctuates all over the place from there. It has dropped to 5,400 kh/s and now staying in the 7,800 range. That processor runs fron 40-60 usage. I can restart the bat and everything starts back in the 9,100 range. Do I need a stronger processor for rig B? I ahve them on the same Nvidia driver so I think I eliminated that as a culprit.
May 22, 2014, 08:23:03 AM
The most profitable coin now for Nvidia card is ?
TY .
JPC might be good with the recent price increases (and this is really an nvidia coin since a 750ti does better than a R9 290x) TY
. May 22, 2014, 08:13:19 AM
Mine was set to advanced. So far ive had 18CureCoins for 3 days
May 22, 2014, 08:03:59 AM
So I just learned that using the -advanced flag on F@H makes sure you don't get any points, probably explains why I never got what the client promised -.- DANG YOU TUTORIAL THAT I SAW SOMEWHERE YOU STINK... No rage... at all... Fuzzy... Science...
it seems to work ok for me (well will see tonight... for sure) May 22, 2014, 07:58:09 AM
The most profitable coin now for Nvidia card is ?
TY .
TY
.seem hircoin, now that dark reach 3600 of diff
but i dunno about scrypt
May 22, 2014, 07:57:01 AM
Now that nVidia and CCminer are whipping AMD's ass expect to see some hate. Most people are not gracious losers.
Jump to: