Author

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 503. (Read 3426976 times)

newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
NVIDIA Software can dig X11?

Yes, CCminer 1.0 can.
Hello, can someone point me to ccminer binaries link?
I found only source.
Thanks in advance.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
Anyone having any luck mining DRK at suchpool?

I am using the binaries that DJM provided and cannot get my cards to not crash at all...  Basically the same settings I was using on Groestlcoin (+89/-502).

Don't have much time to play with it tonight, but the first round of hashes before it crashes the drivers I see about 800khash/s from each card.

Anyone have to adjust their settings? going to try 0 OC next and see if that will even stay up for 20 secs.


For drk I dropped my oc to +150 and brought memclock back to 0. I got a better hashrate with those settings and stopped getting the "does not validate on Cpu". I stopped mining drk after a few hours..... What's everyone else mining?

Thanks again to C+C!
libertycoin, juggalocoin (like it, I hope that at some point they will wake up, easy to solo mine), badgercoin, a new one should be released (it was posted in the thread)
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Anyone having any luck mining DRK at suchpool?

I am using the binaries that DJM provided and cannot get my cards to not crash at all...  Basically the same settings I was using on Groestlcoin (+89/-502).

Don't have much time to play with it tonight, but the first round of hashes before it crashes the drivers I see about 800khash/s from each card.

Anyone have to adjust their settings? going to try 0 OC next and see if that will even stay up for 20 secs.


For drk I dropped my oc to +150 and brought memclock back to 0. I got a better hashrate with those settings and stopped getting the "does not validate on Cpu". I stopped mining drk after a few hours..... What's everyone else mining?

Thanks again to C+C!
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
Hey Christian,

Do you solo mine anime coin or pool mine?

I didn't see a config file in the first couple or last few pages of the thread.

I used to solo it for a while.

Christian
legendary
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
Which ccminer version is latest to work with Compute 2.0 cards?
As in the README
Code:
This code should be running on nVidia GPUs ranging from compute capability
3.0 up to compute capability 3.5. Support for Compute 2.0 has been dropped
so we can more efficiently implement new algorithms using the latest hardware
features.
So? 0.5 worked on Compute 2.0 cards, and I don't have readme files for some of the builds. Given that between 0.5 and 1.0 there is no speed diff in heavy/fugue/groestl I just wonder if some of newer coins (jackpot/mjollnir ...) can be mined with 2.0 cards.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502

yeah let's change this to very now.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Which ccminer version is latest to work with Compute 2.0 cards?
As in the README
Code:
This code should be running on nVidia GPUs ranging from compute capability
3.0 up to compute capability 3.5. Support for Compute 2.0 has been dropped
so we can more efficiently implement new algorithms using the latest hardware
features.

if you look at the time I posted my message and the time Christian posted his, that should be obvious.
I named it v11 because it was (I thought) v0.11 (I have all the collection in one directory and being a bit lazy...)
And as I have stated in my message, you should use the official release.
Yeah, I was being lazy too, and confused Tongue But thanks for doing this Wink

Hey Christian! Intro post still states X11 as (very soon) Cool
legendary
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
Which ccminer version is latest to work with Compute 2.0 cards?
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
here some binaries (only the exe)
http://www66.zippyshare.com/v/926349/file.html (the usual dll are needed)

the file ccminer_v11_gtx780ti.exe   is compiled with x86; compute 3.5; fermi/maxwell flag set to 0
the file ccminer_v11_gtx750ti.exe   is compiled with x86; compute 3.5; fermi/maxwell flag set to 1

you are highly encouraged to move to the official binaries when there will be out tomorrow (I don't exclude possible omission of some fermi/maxwell flag in the 780ti version

These are V1.1? A new version that isn't in the source code either?
https://github.com/cbuchner1/ccminer/commits/master Last commit was the V1.0
if you look at the time I posted my message and the time Christian posted his, that should be obvious.
I named it v11 because it was (I thought) v0.11 (I have all the collection in one directory and being a bit lazy...)
And as I have stated in my message, you should use the official release.
hero member
Activity: 676
Merit: 500
Hey guys what have you done for one night  Grin Grin Grin?
So x11 , what coin do you mine , i have to try something.
All hail Christian + Cristian !!!
I was wondering why my jackpot pool lodt 1.4ghs , and now i know the reason hahahaha.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
here some binaries (only the exe)
http://www66.zippyshare.com/v/926349/file.html (the usual dll are needed)

the file ccminer_v11_gtx780ti.exe   is compiled with x86; compute 3.5; fermi/maxwell flag set to 0
the file ccminer_v11_gtx750ti.exe   is compiled with x86; compute 3.5; fermi/maxwell flag set to 1

you are highly encouraged to move to the official binaries when there will be out tomorrow (I don't exclude possible omission of some fermi/maxwell flag in the 780ti version

These are V1.1? A new version that isn't in the source code either?
https://github.com/cbuchner1/ccminer/commits/master Last commit was the V1.0
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
I don't think this has anything to do on this thread, please delete your post.
Christian took the correct decision which is to just ignore the bashing. (now I don't see any point in propagating the "feud" the other way around)
(xpm mafia bashing is ok though  Grin well... even that no, sanity won, we should just enjoy our victory)
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 272
1xbit.com
I feel Spoetnik has his own smear campaign towards ccminer for some reason, he keeps bashing every comment regarding nvidia jackpot mining. For instance he claims that the miners report false hashrates etc - Although if they do, they fool the pools too then since I see the same average hashrate on the pool side on graphs :p Any official comments on this?

Spoetnik spews his paranoid verbal diarrhoea in virtually every thread. I think there's actually something wrong with his head.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
Darkcoin difficulty 3165  Cool (+50% today)
c&c hash factory work hard
good. less nvidia rigs elsewhere  Grin

(however I'd like to see some profitability charts regarding drk... )
full member
Activity: 263
Merit: 100
Darkcoin difficulty 3165  Cool (+50% today)
c&c hash factory work hard
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
I'm giving X11 a go now on Badgercoin (POW ends tonight)

Running on my 4 x 750ti rig I get around 1.5Mh/s when only one card is running. With all 4 cards running, 2 cards per batch file, I get around 2.6Mh/s per pair Smiley
full member
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
Did I understood right, the hashrate displayed on ccminer should be divided by 4 to get the "real" hashrate? Your explanation was good otherwise.

it is already divided by the miner software. See the / 4?

Code:
*hashes_done = (foundNonce - first_nonce + 1)/4;


so you get the true effective hash rate. And this wins over AMD.
Alright, cheers. The logic told me it was correct, just got confused. And yeah, I kinda like how the gtx performs Smiley
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
Did I understood right, the hashrate displayed on ccminer should be divided by 4 to get the "real" hashrate? Your explanation was good otherwise.

it is already divided by the miner software. See the / 4?

here are the two places in code in jackpotcoin.cu

Code:
*hashes_done = (foundNonce - first_nonce + 1)/4;

and

Code:
*hashes_done = (pdata[19] - first_nonce + 1)/4;

so you get the true effective hash rate. And this wins over AMD.

Jump to: