Then again, the miner reports 4.4 Mh/s for my gtx 680, and the pool graph reports me around 4.4Mh/s, with 0-1 % rejects. So basicly I can say I have a hashrate of 4.4Mh/s? Or did I misunderstood something?
Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 504. (Read 3426976 times)
May 10, 2014, 04:22:41 AM
Did I understood right, the hashrate displayed on ccminer should be divided by 4 to get the "real" hashrate? Your explanation was good otherwise.
Then again, the miner reports 4.4 Mh/s for my gtx 680, and the pool graph reports me around 4.4Mh/s, with 0-1 % rejects. So basicly I can say I have a hashrate of 4.4Mh/s? Or did I misunderstood something?
Then again, the miner reports 4.4 Mh/s for my gtx 680, and the pool graph reports me around 4.4Mh/s, with 0-1 % rejects. So basicly I can say I have a hashrate of 4.4Mh/s? Or did I misunderstood something?
May 10, 2014, 04:18:24 AM
I tagged the v1.0 release and uploaded a binary.
Christian
...thanks a lot for x11!
I will send you both a little something in old school BTC
May 10, 2014, 04:06:28 AM
Donated a bit of JPC.
I feel Spoetnik has his own smear campaign towards ccminer for some reason, he keeps bashing every comment regarding nvidia jackpot mining. For instance he claims that the miners report false hashrates etc - Although if they do, they fool the pools too then since I see the same average hashrate on the pool side on graphs :p Any official comments on this?
I feel Spoetnik has his own smear campaign towards ccminer for some reason, he keeps bashing every comment regarding nvidia jackpot mining. For instance he claims that the miners report false hashrates etc - Although if they do, they fool the pools too then since I see the same average hashrate on the pool side on graphs :p Any official comments on this?
the Jackpot algorithm has a bit of randomization in terms of which hash function shall be taken. There's three rounds in total with a random choice of either Groestl or Skein, followed by a random choice of either Blake or JH. The slowest hash functions are Groestl and JH.
I am dropping Groestl hashes in the first round (50% of all hashes), and Groestl hashes in the second round (50% of the remaining hashes), meaning 25% of all Hashes remain. The reported hash rate is hence divided by 4 to make the results correct. The overall effect is still a notable speed gain over doing the slow Groestl in all rounds.
Since every hash is like a lottery ticket with equal chances of winning, it doesn't matter if you drop a certain subset of hashes. All that matters is that you evaluate as many hashes per second as possible, increasing your chances of winning. So I prefer to evaluate the faster hashes only.
Spoetnik doesn't know what he's talking about. Also he's already on my ignore list, so he can trash talk whatever he wants.
May 10, 2014, 04:03:56 AM
Donated a bit of JPC.
I feel Spoetnik has his own smear campaign towards ccminer for some reason, he keeps bashing every comment regarding nvidia jackpot mining. For instance he claims that the miners report false hashrates etc - Although if they do, they fool the pools too then since I see the same average hashrate on the pool side on graphs :p Any official comments on this?
I feel Spoetnik has his own smear campaign towards ccminer for some reason, he keeps bashing every comment regarding nvidia jackpot mining. For instance he claims that the miners report false hashrates etc - Although if they do, they fool the pools too then since I see the same average hashrate on the pool side on graphs :p Any official comments on this?
May 10, 2014, 03:53:03 AM
I tagged the v1.0 release and uploaded a binary.
Christian
May 10, 2014, 03:26:00 AM
Code:
[2014-05-10 10:08:30] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 1696 khash/s (yay!!!)
at drk.coinmine.plThats Palit dual OC which defaults to 1200/1500
I'm getting about 1650ish with a Gigabyte 750Ti on the same pool.
May 10, 2014, 02:09:59 AM
Code:
[2014-05-10 10:08:30] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 1696 khash/s (yay!!!)
at drk.coinmine.plThats Palit dual OC which defaults to 1200/1500
May 10, 2014, 12:55:15 AM
Anyone having any luck mining DRK at suchpool?
I am using the binaries that DJM provided and cannot get my cards to not crash at all... Basically the same settings I was using on Groestlcoin (+89/-502).
Don't have much time to play with it tonight, but the first round of hashes before it crashes the drivers I see about 800khash/s from each card.
Anyone have to adjust their settings? going to try 0 OC next and see if that will even stay up for 20 secs.
I am using the binaries that DJM provided and cannot get my cards to not crash at all... Basically the same settings I was using on Groestlcoin (+89/-502).
Don't have much time to play with it tonight, but the first round of hashes before it crashes the drivers I see about 800khash/s from each card.
Anyone have to adjust their settings? going to try 0 OC next and see if that will even stay up for 20 secs.
Code:
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] 6 miner threads started, using 'x11' algorithm.
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://stratum1.suchpool.pw:3335
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
[2014-05-09 22:52:41] thread 3: 1048577 hashes, 645.24 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:41] thread 1: 1048577 hashes, 583.81 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:41] thread 4: 1048577 hashes, 578.01 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:41] thread 0: 1048577 hashes, 575.48 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:41] thread 5: 1048577 hashes, 569.23 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:41] thread 2: 1048577 hashes, 555.06 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:47] thread 4: 5871425 hashes, 1117 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:47] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 4046 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:52:57] thread 4: 10759887 hashes, 1070 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:57] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 3998 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:12] thread 2: 33357825 hashes, 1094 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:12] thread 5: 34209793 hashes, 1100 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:13] thread 0: 34537473 hashes, 1098 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:14] thread 1: 35061761 hashes, 1079 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:14] thread 1: 262716 hashes, 1034 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:14] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 6041 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:17] thread 3: 38731777 hashes, 1074 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:21] thread 1: 7802438 hashes, 1092 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:21] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 6527 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:25] thread 4: 31536763 hashes, 1119 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:25] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 6577 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:30] thread 2: 19854625 hashes, 1124 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:30] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 6607 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:30] thread 3: 13873280 hashes, 1093 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:30] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 6626 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:33] thread 1: 13050147 hashes, 1084 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:33] accepted: 8/8 (100.00%), 6618 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:34] thread 5: 24475622 hashes, 1118 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:34] accepted: 9/9 (100.00%), 6636 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://stratum1.suchpool.pw:3335
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
[2014-05-09 22:52:39] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
[2014-05-09 22:52:41] thread 3: 1048577 hashes, 645.24 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:41] thread 1: 1048577 hashes, 583.81 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:41] thread 4: 1048577 hashes, 578.01 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:41] thread 0: 1048577 hashes, 575.48 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:41] thread 5: 1048577 hashes, 569.23 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:41] thread 2: 1048577 hashes, 555.06 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:47] thread 4: 5871425 hashes, 1117 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:47] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 4046 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:52:57] thread 4: 10759887 hashes, 1070 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:52:57] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 3998 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:12] thread 2: 33357825 hashes, 1094 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:12] thread 5: 34209793 hashes, 1100 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:13] thread 0: 34537473 hashes, 1098 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:14] thread 1: 35061761 hashes, 1079 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:14] thread 1: 262716 hashes, 1034 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:14] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 6041 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:17] thread 3: 38731777 hashes, 1074 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:21] thread 1: 7802438 hashes, 1092 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:21] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 6527 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:25] thread 4: 31536763 hashes, 1119 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:25] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 6577 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:30] thread 2: 19854625 hashes, 1124 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:30] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 6607 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:30] thread 3: 13873280 hashes, 1093 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:30] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 6626 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:33] thread 1: 13050147 hashes, 1084 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:33] accepted: 8/8 (100.00%), 6618 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-05-09 22:53:34] thread 5: 24475622 hashes, 1118 khash/s
[2014-05-09 22:53:34] accepted: 9/9 (100.00%), 6636 khash/s (yay!!!)
Seems a bit slow with 6x 750ti unless I am missing something.
ccminer_v11_gtx750ti -a x11 -o stratum+tcp://stratum1.suchpool.pw:3335 -u user.miner -p pass
All that is with +0/+0 OC settings.
May 10, 2014, 12:47:58 AM
Anyone having any luck mining DRK at suchpool?
I am using the binaries that DJM provided and cannot get my cards to not crash at all... Basically the same settings I was using on Groestlcoin (+89/-502).
Don't have much time to play with it tonight, but the first round of hashes before it crashes the drivers I see about 800khash/s from each card.
Anyone have to adjust their settings? going to try 0 OC next and see if that will even stay up for 20 secs.
I am using the binaries that DJM provided and cannot get my cards to not crash at all... Basically the same settings I was using on Groestlcoin (+89/-502).
Don't have much time to play with it tonight, but the first round of hashes before it crashes the drivers I see about 800khash/s from each card.
Anyone have to adjust their settings? going to try 0 OC next and see if that will even stay up for 20 secs.
May 10, 2014, 12:15:38 AM
Start mined BTQ ... yeah, I know I was late, .
I thought Quark has quick transaction time(8 seconds?), but when I tried to send 2 blocks to 13GFwLiZL2DaA9XeE733PNrQX5QYLFsonS, it took quite some time to process....
. I thought Quark has quick transaction time(8 seconds?), but when I tried to send 2 blocks to 13GFwLiZL2DaA9XeE733PNrQX5QYLFsonS, it took quite some time to process....
May 09, 2014, 10:56:44 PM
Finally get my rig setup to mine Talkcoin -- just for fun and want to say hi to you guys. Have 2 blocks mined.. but still wait for mature.
May 09, 2014, 09:37:33 PM
670/660ti 1.7 mhash windows build few post behind
May 09, 2014, 09:11:11 PM
by the way, is this the optimized version of X11 or shall we expect something faster soon ?
Anyhow, I have able to find 5 blocks of juggalocoin (2 by the 780ti, 3 by the R9)
Anyhow, I have able to find 5 blocks of juggalocoin (2 by the 780ti, 3 by the R9)
May 09, 2014, 08:43:44 PM
try out the X11 in the github repo, maybe? does it build on Linux too (run ./autogen.sh)?
A proper binary release might follow after I caught some sleep.
A proper binary release might follow after I caught some sleep.
Thank you for that. More munitions for the CCminer Army!
May 09, 2014, 08:12:42 PM
Here's for a 770 and should be fine with 670 etc also.
compute30,sm30 & MAXWELL_OR_FERMI 0
http://www15.zippyshare.com/v/56193063/file.html (x86)
compute30,sm30 & MAXWELL_OR_FERMI 0
http://www15.zippyshare.com/v/56193063/file.html (x86)
May 09, 2014, 08:07:21 PM
here some binaries (only the exe)
http://www66.zippyshare.com/v/926349/file.html (the usual dll are needed)
the file ccminer_v11_gtx780ti.exe is compiled with x86; compute 3.5; fermi/maxwell flag set to 0
the file ccminer_v11_gtx750ti.exe is compiled with x86; compute 3.5; fermi/maxwell flag set to 1
you are highly encouraged to move to the official binaries when there will be out tomorrow (I don't exclude possible omission of some fermi/maxwell flag in the 780ti version
http://www66.zippyshare.com/v/926349/file.html (the usual dll are needed)
the file ccminer_v11_gtx780ti.exe is compiled with x86; compute 3.5; fermi/maxwell flag set to 0
the file ccminer_v11_gtx750ti.exe is compiled with x86; compute 3.5; fermi/maxwell flag set to 1
you are highly encouraged to move to the official binaries when there will be out tomorrow (I don't exclude possible omission of some fermi/maxwell flag in the 780ti version
May 09, 2014, 07:57:53 PM
Quote
ok, took the plunge in trying to learn to compile the ccminer source in windows and ran into my first roadblock. Trying to open the ccminer.sln in Visual Basic 2010 (sp1) and it says it can't open the .vcxproj because it's not supported.
Do I have the wrong Visual Studio? I went 2010 Visual Stdio Express and chose (Basic).
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Do I have the wrong Visual Studio? I went 2010 Visual Stdio Express and chose (Basic).
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Quote
I have no problem clicking the vcxproj (this is what I usually do) may be try clicking the ccminer.sln
edit: by visual basic you mean visual studio (you need c++) ?
If not it is visual studio which is needed not only visual basic (even less as it is a c/c++ project)
edit: by visual basic you mean visual studio (you need c++) ?
If not it is visual studio which is needed not only visual basic (even less as it is a c/c++ project)
You can actually use Visual Studio 2012 Express to compile it, or that's what I've been using at least. I have 2 770's so once I open the project
file ccminer.vcxproj I go to debug I think it is then ccminer settings and change compute35,sm35 under the cuda settings to compute30,sm30
(but keep it as compute/sm35 if you have maxell) then I make sure it's compiling for 32-bit machine code. Save those settings.
I also compile it as release win32 because I haven't had a ton of luck compiling ccminer 64bit and hasing properly...then just build and it should build fine but also make sure to change the #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI flag to 0 if you have a kepler etc board. You can use the replace all feature in VS to do it really quickly just copy and paste.
The express version is a free download from Microsoft, just google it. You only have to install the C/C++ part of it.
Oh yeah, also make sure you've extracted the pre-built binary prerequisites linked in the OP into the projects folder for VS in your my documents folder (at least by default).
May 09, 2014, 07:56:50 PM
Argghhh, my visual studio 2010 professional trial expired.
Hmmmm, can someone compile it for 750 ti. Purty please.
Hmmmm, can someone compile it for 750 ti. Purty please.
May 09, 2014, 07:45:46 PM
ok, took the plunge in trying to learn to compile the ccminer source in windows and ran into my first roadblock. Trying to open the ccminer.sln in Visual Basic 2010 (sp1) and it says it can't open the .vcxproj because it's not supported.
Do I have the wrong Visual Studio? I went 2010 Visual Stdio Express and chose (Basic).
Any help would be greatly appreciated
I have no problem clicking the vcxproj (this is what I usually do) may be try clicking the ccminer.slnDo I have the wrong Visual Studio? I went 2010 Visual Stdio Express and chose (Basic).
Any help would be greatly appreciated
edit: by visual basic you mean visual studio (you need c++) ?
If not it is visual studio which is needed not only visual basic (even less as it is a c/c++ project)
May 09, 2014, 07:42:32 PM
ok, took the plunge in trying to learn to compile the ccminer source in windows and ran into my first roadblock. Trying to open the ccminer.sln in Visual Basic 2010 (sp1) and it says it can't open the .vcxproj because it's not supported.
Do I have the wrong Visual Studio? I went 2010 Visual Stdio Express and chose (Basic).
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Do I have the wrong Visual Studio? I went 2010 Visual Stdio Express and chose (Basic).
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Jump to: