[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 534.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: cbuchner1 on May 04, 2014, 10:48:22 AM

Quote from: djm34 on May 04, 2014, 10:39:38 AM

not really sure, it is worth running on... 3 hours (23MHash/s) on 1gh gets you 37 MNR.... kind of ridiculous...

I found 21 blocks in the first 20 minutes. yay.

I beat you... 120blocks in the first 11 minutes nothing at all after that
It is a little better than for futurcoin where I got many blocks but nothing after the 2nd minutes

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: djm34 on May 04, 2014, 10:39:38 AM

not really sure, it is worth running on... 3 hours (23MHash/s) on 1gh gets you 37 MNR.... kind of ridiculous...

I found 21 blocks in the first 20 minutes. yay.

cayars

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: zstanic on May 04, 2014, 10:37:16 AM

Hello, what values do you get for MNR?
I have 2 750Ti's, and I'm getting ~25500 khash/s.
Is it OK?

You're right where you want to be. Just a matter of your overclock.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

not really sure, it is worth running on... 3 hours (23MHash/s) on 1gh gets you 37 MNR.... kind of ridiculous...
(anyhow the nvidia went back to jackpotcoin right after the end of the launch (when the diff was around 64).
I just keep the R9-290x there, as it does better on that than on jackpotcoin...

zstanic

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Hello, what values do you get for MNR?
I have 2 750Ti's, and I'm getting ~25500 khash/s.
Is it OK?

cryptomines

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: AizenSou on May 04, 2014, 10:05:32 AM

ccminer gets a lot of disconnections for 1gh pool with mjollnircoin, similar to hefty. Anyone knows a fix for this? I only get 70% accepted shares.

I've had better luck at the other pools. I got a lot of rejected shares at 1gh

https://mnr.suprnova.cc/index.php

http://mnr.nonce-pool.com/index.php

AizenSou

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

ccminer gets a lot of disconnections for 1gh pool with mjollnircoin, similar to hefty. Anyone knows a fix for this? I only get 70% accepted shares.

labestia

member

Activity: 86

Merit: 10

would anyone be able to recommend a coin using scrypt-jane which would have a similar mining experience to the upcoming Black Dragon Coin? I'd like to get my system ready to roll so i don't spend time messing with settings once it's live.

thanks guys, this has been the most helpful thread on the entire forum.

Breadpudding

member

Activity: 76

Merit: 12

Heh, silly me. Got it, thanks

Quote from: djm34 on May 04, 2014, 08:15:49 AM

Quote from: Breadpudding on May 04, 2014, 08:09:56 AM

Could someone post their working MNR .bat file, I'm not able to configure it properly - keep on getting boos.

there is nothing to configure
ccminer -a mjollnir

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: Breadpudding on May 04, 2014, 08:09:56 AM

Could someone post their working MNR .bat file, I'm not able to configure it properly - keep on getting boos.

there is nothing to configure
ccminer -a mjollnir

Breadpudding

member

Activity: 76

Merit: 12

Could someone post their working MNR .bat file, I'm not able to configure it properly - keep on getting boos.

he-man

full member

Activity: 128

Merit: 100

How many Mega hashes does a single 750Ti get with the groestl algo? is there a new update?

c0rtiz0n

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Tested with JRyoku's compile w/ the corrected code : my 660 (no ti) jumped from 3.8MH to 7.5MH Tongue

edit :is there an option to log verbose in a file? for some reason the program crashes at some point but I can't get the reason why (issue is with both my own compile or JRyoku's).

edit2 : seems it stabilizes itself... nevermind

Croak

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: JRyoku on May 03, 2014, 07:12:32 PM

Quote from: Chris84 on May 03, 2014, 06:06:25 PM

Quote from: djm34 on May 03, 2014, 06:01:19 PM

Quote from: cayars on May 03, 2014, 05:57:25 PM

Quote from: JRyoku on May 03, 2014, 04:30:08 PM

Compiled three versions for 3.0, 3.5, and 5.0 following the #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI. Did I do this right? Works on my PC.

https://mega.co.nz/#!adBy1YiY!bwix_AfHUKGPmLzm2BvxmX1zcMcRvUQq0SscyZhVMh0

edit: re-uploaded the zip, 5.0 was compiled before the stratum update.

I just tried your compiled version and ran it against HVC with drastic drop off in hash rate. Went from 24MH to 16MH with 2 750tis.

have the same problem (with my own compilation), it is due to the fact that gpu usage stays at 50%, you need to open 2 separate instances to run at full gpu usage.

We did a little mistake with the Timing. Plz do the follow (if you compiled the code a your own):

Code:

open the file: "Heavy/heavy.cu"
goto line 329: "MyStreamSynchronize(NULL, 0, thr_id);"
Change it to: "MyStreamSynchronize(NULL, 1, thr_id);"

This should help, we implemented a Counter, so I didn't tested this exact way. Next release will be fine

Christian

Made the code change, works correct on my 780. Here is the new zip.

https://mega.co.nz/#!CV5nGLaZ!WXL66wxvN5ifnqn2wEh4fk-e5WoCB7cBqmmQpsRUIh8

Using your 0.8 binary is a nice little speedup on HVC for me, used to get about 25500-26000 khash/s each with my 780Ti's running a single instance.

[2014-05-04 06:30:36] thread 1: 1768423424 hashes, 29389 khash/s
[2014-05-04 06:30:39] thread 0: 274112674 hashes, 30157 khash/s
[2014-05-04 06:30:39] accepted: 31/31 (100.00%), 59546 khash/s (yay!!!)

antonio8

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

Quote from: liomojo1 on May 03, 2014, 05:36:55 PM

Guys if you want better hashrate for jackpot on 6 x ti 750 use the -d function and separate to -d 0,1,2 and onother ccminer with -d 3,4,5 .I don`t know why but with this settings i managed to reach my single ti 750 at 3000khs for card. Grin

Are you getting 3,000 kh/s per card? The most I get is 2,060 kh/s but I am not overclocked. I am using ccminer v0.8 with the 50.exe

cayars

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

I'd say you guys are the best but you already think that so... Shocked

LOL

Seriously thank you all for the help!

Hopefully having this info in the thread will help someone else also.

Carlo

JRyoku

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote from: cayars on May 03, 2014, 07:29:25 PM

Quote from: bigjme on May 03, 2014, 07:24:58 PM

That was put jn after the tutorial. What card is it for?

750ti you set the variable to 1
660 to 780 you set it to 0

Ccminer30 is compute 3.0 660 to 770
Ccminer35 is compute 3.5 780, 780ti, titan
Ccminer50 is compute 3.5 750, 750Ti

Somoone correct me if im wrong, its almost 2am so im talking off the top of my head

Got that and it covers ccminer50.exe below:
ccminer50.exe was compiled for Compute 3.5 with #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI set to 1 in three .cu modules

However what else is set differently to build ccminer30.exe and ccminer35.exe as they both have #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI set to 0:
ccminer35.exe was compiled for Compute 3.5 with #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI set to 0 in three .cu modules
ccminer30.exe was compiled for Compute 3.0 with #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI set to 0 in three .cu modules

That what I'm asking.

In Visual Studio 2010 select ccminer in the left menu, press alt + f7, in the left column click Configuration Properties, Cuda C/C++, Device.
In the right window under Code Generation it should list "compute_35,sm_35" by default. That value is for compute 3.5 and 5.0.
If you click the drop down arrow on the right hand side of it, you can edit it. Change it to "compute_30,sm_30" to build under compute 3.0

cayars

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: bigjme on May 03, 2014, 07:24:58 PM

That was put jn after the tutorial. What card is it for?

750ti you set the variable to 1
660 to 780 you set it to 0

Ccminer30 is compute 3.0 660 to 770
Ccminer35 is compute 3.5 780, 780ti, titan
Ccminer50 is compute 3.5 750, 750Ti

Somoone correct me if im wrong, its almost 2am so im talking off the top of my head

Got that and it covers ccminer50.exe below:
ccminer50.exe was compiled for Compute 3.5 with #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI set to 1 in three .cu modules

However what else is set differently to build ccminer30.exe and ccminer35.exe as they both have #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI set to 0:
ccminer35.exe was compiled for Compute 3.5 with #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI set to 0 in three .cu modules
ccminer30.exe was compiled for Compute 3.0 with #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI set to 0 in three .cu modules

That what I'm asking.

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

That was put jn after the tutorial. What card is it for?

750ti you set the variable to 1
660 to 780 you set it to 0

Ccminer30 is compute 3.0 660 to 770
Ccminer35 is compute 3.5 780, 780ti, titan
Ccminer50 is compute 3.5 750, 750Ti

Somoone correct me if im wrong, its almost 2am so im talking off the top of my head

cayars

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: bigjme on May 03, 2014, 06:33:56 PM

http://www.cudaminers.net/forum/how-to-compile-cudaminer-source-on-windows-thread.html

A guide i did a while back with pictures. Only shows compiling but shows how to use everything

That was quite helpful!

Now I think I'm to the last step which wasn't included in the tutorial.

SourceCode.txt has the following entries
NOTE:
ccminer50.exe was compiled for Compute 3.5 with #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI set to 1 in three .cu modules
ccminer35.exe was compiled for Compute 3.5 with #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI set to 0 in three .cu modules
ccminer30.exe was compiled for Compute 3.0 with #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI set to 0 in three .cu modules

What is the difference between ccminer35.exe & ccminer30.exe?

What is the preferred way to build for
30, 35 and 50 EXE versions?

Every so close,
Carlo

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 534. (Read 3426976 times)