Author

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 538. (Read 3426976 times)

hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000

Oh come on, it is not everyday that your profit just increases 30 times. It is like jackpot already.
The block reward has been like forever >100k+, so a few days at 300k does not change anything
(and everybody are already holding millions...  Grin)
anyhow the net hashrate has already doubled (that doesn't scare everybody)  Grin

No you are wrong. It was around 10k yesterday @ block 310000. After this block this should change to 9999.9 but because of a bug in the code it becomes 310000.1
You know what happens after that. Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
in the mean time, it could be a good idea to mine mrc, the reward is around 300k because of a bug (which will be fixed pretty soon)  Grin

Holy **** they are kidding me?? The dev was absent all the time and now the block reward suddenly goes up 30 times. I will dump all my MRC holding now. This is stupid.
it is being fixed... (but seriously, the coin has been always easy to get, so a few day at 300k won't change anything... (are you reftop123 ? Grin)
except some will be able to buy some very cheap...

Oh come on, it is not everyday that your profit just increases 30 times. It is like jackpot already.
The block reward has been like forever >100k+, so a few days at 300k does not change anything
(and everybody are already holding millions...  Grin)
anyhow the net hashrate has already doubled (that doesn't scare everybody)  Grin
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
in the mean time, it could be a good idea to mine mrc, the reward is around 300k because of a bug (which will be fixed pretty soon)  Grin

Holy **** they are kidding me?? The dev was absent all the time and now the block reward suddenly goes up 30 times. I will dump all my MRC holding now. This is stupid.
it is being fixed... (but seriously, the coin has been always easy to get, so a few day at 300k won't change anything... (are you reftop123 ? Grin)
except some will be able to buy some very cheap...

Oh come on, it is not everyday that your profit just increases 30 times. It is like jackpot already.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
don't know, if the vote is passed to the hash which get submitted (didn't check) the hash won't get validated (nor recognised)
A simple hack, would be to just remove the part sending the vote...

block header size changes, input size to the hashes changes.

So we have to modify 5 hardcoded hash functions to take a different input block size.
Chris74 initially only modified 1 out of 5, thinking this would work.

Christian


okay, now we've got MNR hashing, but we broke HeavyCoin in the process. Meh.

Will take a bit until we can release this.


Looks like MNR will be relaunched this evening. Any chance ccminer will be ready by then. Thanks for all your hard work!
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
in the mean time, it could be a good idea to mine mrc, the reward is around 300k because of a bug (which will be fixed pretty soon)  Grin

Holy **** they are kidding me?? The dev was absent all the time and now the block reward suddenly goes up 30 times. I will dump all my MRC holding now. This is stupid.
it is being fixed... (but seriously, the coin has been always easy to get, so a few day at 300k won't change anything... (are you reftop123 ? Grin)
except some will be able to buy some very cheap...
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
in the mean time, it could be a good idea to mine mrc, the reward is around 300k because of a bug (which will be fixed pretty soon)  Grin

Holy **** they are kidding me?? The dev was absent all the time and now the block reward suddenly goes up 30 times. I will dump all my MRC holding now. This is stupid.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
in the mean time, it could be a good idea to mine mrc, the reward is around 300k because of a bug (which will be fixed pretty soon)  Grin
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
don't know, if the vote is passed to the hash which get submitted (didn't check) the hash won't get validated (nor recognised)
A simple hack, would be to just remove the part sending the vote...

block header size changes, input size to the hashes changes.

So we have to modify 5 hardcoded hash functions to take a different input block size.
Chris74 initially only modified 1 out of 5, thinking this would work.

Christian


okay, now we've got MNR hashing, but we broke HeavyCoin in the process. Meh.

Will take a bit until we can release this.


They change the block size because they remove the voting process? How many hope could they give from a clone while the original is barely alive. Meeh!

Has anyone managed to mine Saffroncoin on a groestl pool?  I was solomining it but considering trying a pool. 

Just saw this about ccminer shares not being compatible for some reason.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6522687

That's what I said 2 days ago.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
don't know, if the vote is passed to the hash which get submitted (didn't check) the hash won't get validated (nor recognised)
A simple hack, would be to just remove the part sending the vote...

block header size changes, input size to the hashes changes.

So we have to modify 5 hardcoded hash functions to take a different input block size.
Chris74 initially only modified 1 out of 5, thinking this would work.

Christian


okay, now we've got MNR hashing, but we broke HeavyCoin in the process. Meh.

Will take a bit until we can release this.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Has anyone managed to mine Saffroncoin on a groestl pool?  I was solomining it but considering trying a pool. 

Just saw this about ccminer shares not being compatible for some reason.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6522687
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
I was looking to bypass the if statements for heavy so it just rand the usual block headers and submitted the same length as others, unsure if that would work. I think i changed 3 so far. And i need to hunt down the last 2
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
don't know, if the vote is passed to the hash which get submitted (didn't check) the hash won't get validated (nor recognised)
A simple hack, would be to just remove the part sending the vote...

block header size changes, input size to the hashes changes.

So we have to modify 5 hardcoded hash functions to take a different input block size.
Chris74 initially only modified 1 out of 5, thinking this would work.

Christian
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
isnt it the exact same code as heavy without the voting christian?
ive just set a variable in there for if it should submit voting data or not, im testing the compile now

djm34 can you sent me a config to launch the coin with? feel free to leave your account details and i will mine directly for you to test it?
which one ?

mjollnircoin. just realised the coin isnt released sorry Smiley
may be as simple as to remove the voting system for that algo so yehhhh
don't know, if the vote is passed to the hash which get submitted (didn't check) the hash won't get validated (nor recognised)
A simple hack, would be to just remove the part sending the vote...
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
GeForce GTX Titan Z: 2 GK110 TDP only 375 watt .

How Much KH/S in scrypt with this ? Anyone Know ? .
not enough for the pricetag (better wait for gtx880)

edit: it would be 1400~1500khash/s since it is 2 gtx780ti for the price of 5
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
GeForce GTX Titan Z: 2 GK110 TDP only 375 watt .

How Much KH/S in scrypt with this ? Anyone Know ? .
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
isnt it the exact same code as heavy without the voting christian?
ive just set a variable in there for if it should submit voting data or not, im testing the compile now

djm34 can you sent me a config to launch the coin with? feel free to leave your account details and i will mine directly for you to test it?
which one ?

mjollnircoin. just realised the coin isnt released sorry Smiley
may be as simple as to remove the voting system for that algo so yehhhh
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
isnt it the exact same code as heavy without the voting christian?
ive just set a variable in there for if it should submit voting data or not, im testing the compile now

djm34 can you sent me a config to launch the coin with? feel free to leave your account details and i will mine directly for you to test it?
which one ?
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
isnt it the exact same code as heavy without the voting christian?
ive just set a variable in there for if it should submit voting data or not, im testing the compile now

djm34 can you sent me a config to launch the coin with? feel free to leave your account details and i will mine directly for you to test it?
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
Is there an updated version of hvc to use with mjollnircoin ?
Will it work with current hvc version ?
Or what can be done to fix it (looking into the code I guess first...  Grin, I didn't tried yet that)

oops, we missed the launch window.

We already have the code in our closed repo. I'll quickly make sure it works before posting it into
the ccMiner github repository.

EDIT:  oops, not working

Code:
[2014-05-03 13:11:46] 4 miner threads started, using 'mnr' algorithm.
[2014-05-03 13:14:14] hash for nonce=$007A4C80 does not validate on CPU!
[2014-05-03 13:14:41] hash for nonce=$006F5DD6 does not validate on CPU!
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
You would need to rip apart ccminer and just remove everything to do with voting. I can look into it if you want?
Jump to: