I have a GT 550 ti as to reduce the load from 100% to 80%??
settings
cudaminer.exe -i 0 -l 28x4 -C 1 -o stratum+tcp://66.55.92.73:8000 -O 17a59f320fg1745021:123456
Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 55. (Read 3426944 times)
October 24, 2014, 12:59:38 PM
October 24, 2014, 12:03:49 PM
Why is it that I find blocks on pools but as soon as I start to solo mine .........nothing.
Because when you're mining as part of a pool, the entire pool's hashrate is working toward finding/solving blocks. When you're going solo, only your hashrate is working toward blocks. The tradeoff is that when part of a pool, the reward for a solved block is divided among everyone who helped solve that block (according to shares, which depend on individual difficulty & hashrate), whereas if you're mining solo, all the reward of a solved block is yours…if you ever actually manage to find a block on your own…I also noticed that, however over a long enough period this seems to even out (and if the number of block is large enough I usually move back to solo...)
October 24, 2014, 11:37:53 AM
Why is it that I find blocks on pools but as soon as I start to solo mine .........nothing.
Because when you're mining as part of a pool, the entire pool's hashrate is working toward finding/solving blocks. When you're going solo, only your hashrate is working toward blocks. The tradeoff is that when part of a pool, the reward for a solved block is divided among everyone who helped solve that block (according to shares, which depend on individual difficulty & hashrate), whereas if you're mining solo, all the reward of a solved block is yours…if you ever actually manage to find a block on your own… 
October 24, 2014, 08:38:41 AM
950W for this (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/x11localrigwolf-10232014.png
So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.
So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.
that's more correct lol
That's high performance numbers - also, check out that 290X
ended up yesterday doing 0kh at 94°C on sk1024 (bitslapper... should bit slapped for his kernels
)14.9 - that ASUS DCII cooler is something - would you believe it's overvolted a little?
what about ambient temp? we are not in summer anymore
Maybe 60F.
that's cold already, could explain those low temps
October 24, 2014, 07:19:32 AM
Why is it that I find blocks on pools but as soon as I start to solo mine .........nothing.
October 24, 2014, 06:56:27 AM
950W for this (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/x11localrigwolf-10232014.png
So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.
So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.
that's more correct lol
That's high performance numbers - also, check out that 290X
ended up yesterday doing 0kh at 94°C on sk1024 (bitslapper... should bit slapped for his kernels
)14.9 - that ASUS DCII cooler is something - would you believe it's overvolted a little?
actually when it reaches 94°c it downclock alone... I saw yesterday core clocks around 700mhz (nominal core clock is 1030MHz)
October 24, 2014, 06:28:12 AM
950W for this (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/x11localrigwolf-10232014.png
So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.
So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.
that's more correct lol
That's high performance numbers - also, check out that 290X
ended up yesterday doing 0kh at 94°C on sk1024 (bitslapper... should bit slapped for his kernels
)14.9 - that ASUS DCII cooler is something - would you believe it's overvolted a little?
what about ambient temp? we are not in summer anymore
October 24, 2014, 05:37:33 AM
950W for this (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/x11localrigwolf-10232014.png
So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.
So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.
that's more correct lol
That's high performance numbers - also, check out that 290X
ended up yesterday doing 0kh at 94°C on sk1024 (bitslapper... should bit slapped for his kernels
) October 24, 2014, 05:33:37 AM
Thank you very much! There is a gain in speed, and also on other algorithms, such as m7 (before used nvminer D8).
October 24, 2014, 01:38:10 AM
950W for this (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/x11localrigwolf-10232014.png
So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.
So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.
that's more correct lol
October 23, 2014, 11:11:04 PM
there is a way to divide the load on ccminer for the same gpu? if i open two instances of ccminer the thing simply crash, i remember in sgminer, that in this case the loaded is divided
it depends... if the memory usage of the 2 instances is larger than what is available on the card, then it will crash. Otherwise it should be ok (I guess... I assume 2 instances running on the same algo... never tried mixing stuff)
it use 1gb of memory for every instance, approximately, maybe it's not a good idea with petit card like 750ti lol, but with a 970-980 should work
someone tested it on scrypt, how many khs for the 970 and 980? cryptoblog reports 600khs for the 980, which seems too low
)Is Feather Coin the only one using the Neoscrypt algo?
I think there are a couple of other coins using it
Guncoin is now using it.
I seen that. It looks like there are a couple thousand more blocks before it kicks in.
I am just curious to see what the 970 will do with that algo. I'll try FTC since it looks like they will hit their target block first.
I'll run it on my 280x and 270x also. Should be sometime on the 26th when it is ready.
October 23, 2014, 07:30:30 PM
there is a way to divide the load on ccminer for the same gpu? if i open two instances of ccminer the thing simply crash, i remember in sgminer, that in this case the loaded is divided
it depends... if the memory usage of the 2 instances is larger than what is available on the card, then it will crash. Otherwise it should be ok (I guess... I assume 2 instances running on the same algo... never tried mixing stuff)
it use 1gb of memory for every instance, approximately, maybe it's not a good idea with petit card like 750ti lol, but with a 970-980 should work
someone tested it on scrypt, how many khs for the 970 and 980? cryptoblog reports 600khs for the 980, which seems too low
)Is Feather Coin the only one using the Neoscrypt algo?
I think there are a couple of other coins using it
Guncoin is now using it.
I seen that. It looks like there are a couple thousand more blocks before it kicks in.
I am just curious to see what the 970 will do with that algo. I'll try FTC since it looks like they will hit their target block first.
October 23, 2014, 05:13:33 PM
there is a way to divide the load on ccminer for the same gpu? if i open two instances of ccminer the thing simply crash, i remember in sgminer, that in this case the loaded is divided
it depends... if the memory usage of the 2 instances is larger than what is available on the card, then it will crash. Otherwise it should be ok (I guess... I assume 2 instances running on the same algo... never tried mixing stuff)
it use 1gb of memory for every instance, approximately, maybe it's not a good idea with petit card like 750ti lol, but with a 970-980 should work
someone tested it on scrypt, how many khs for the 970 and 980? cryptoblog reports 600khs for the 980, which seems too low
)Is Feather Coin the only one using the Neoscrypt algo?
I think there are a couple of other coins using it
Guncoin is now using it.
I seen that. It looks like there are a couple thousand more blocks before it kicks in.
I am just curious to see what the 970 will do with that algo. I'll try FTC since it looks like they will hit their target block first.
October 23, 2014, 04:34:32 PM
there is a way to divide the load on ccminer for the same gpu? if i open two instances of ccminer the thing simply crash, i remember in sgminer, that in this case the loaded is divided
it depends... if the memory usage of the 2 instances is larger than what is available on the card, then it will crash. Otherwise it should be ok (I guess... I assume 2 instances running on the same algo... never tried mixing stuff)
it use 1gb of memory for every instance, approximately, maybe it's not a good idea with petit card like 750ti lol, but with a 970-980 should work
someone tested it on scrypt, how many khs for the 970 and 980? cryptoblog reports 600khs for the 980, which seems too low
)Is Feather Coin the only one using the Neoscrypt algo?
I think there are a couple of other coins using it
Guncoin is now using it.
October 23, 2014, 04:16:33 PM
are you sure all those amd gpu were doing only 545? seems too low to me
You forget - I'm running my own OpenCL.
Here's my numbers with the new 290X:
Hashrates (X11 in MH/s): 270X: 3.58, 280X: 5.71, 290X: 7.79, 7950: 4.99 - total: 22.13
Power @ wall: 610W
Screenshot (NSFW): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/x11localrigwolf-lowpower-10232014.png
So, 22,130kh/s / 610W = 36.27kh/s per W. Hm... I need to turn it down a little.
I should check hash/watt at max performance - just for shits and giggles.
this mean that an "own optimization" for nvidia can make things even better for 970 and 980
i mean amd can't reach new nvidia card ever, no matter the optimization, if it does, then nvidia isn't optimized
October 23, 2014, 03:33:54 PM
are you sure all those amd gpu were doing only 545? seems too low to me
October 23, 2014, 03:26:41 PM
my old rig with asrock h81 pro btc was doing 2600-2700 x 6 at 380-390w total(including cpu/mobo/ram)
so 16mh/s at 390w, 41kh/s per w, but this with the whole system, it's more like 45 kh/s per w
also your math is missing one zero, 20mega are 20k kh/s, therefore 20k/545, 37kh/s per w
so 16mh/s at 390w, 41kh/s per w, but this with the whole system, it's more like 45 kh/s per w
also your math is missing one zero, 20mega are 20k kh/s, therefore 20k/545, 37kh/s per w
October 23, 2014, 01:34:52 PM
What coin is best for 750ti ??
Now , I can make 0.001 per card per day.
no matter what this coin is, if it makes its way to this thread, it won't be anymore the best coin for the 750ti Now , I can make 0.001 per card per day.
^ So don't tell anyone about flappycoin!
October 23, 2014, 01:12:28 PM
What coin is best for 750ti ??
Now , I can make 0.001 per card per day.
no matter what this coin is, if it makes its way to this thread, it won't be anymore the best coin for the 750ti Now , I can make 0.001 per card per day.
^ So don't tell anyone about flappycoin!
Wow Flappycoin. But I can't open website Flappycoin Pool.
October 23, 2014, 01:02:29 PM
What coin is best for 750ti ??
Now , I can make 0.001 per card per day.
no matter what this coin is, if it makes its way to this thread, it won't be anymore the best coin for the 750ti Now , I can make 0.001 per card per day.
^ So don't tell anyone about flappycoin!
Jump to: