[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 653.

lumberinvestments

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: lumberinvestments on March 25, 2014, 11:44:06 AM

BitLeu has just been listed on first exchange.

https://bittrex.com/Market/?MarketName=BTC-BTL

Let's see the pricing going up. Mine it while you still can, hehe.
Whoever screamed scam and that the dev will sell the premined on the exchange will cry now.

Welcome to Bitcoin 2.0

Christian Buchner and ThirtyBird will have my donation of 20 000 BTL each from me for the services they did to the crypto-community.

lumberinvestments

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

BitLeu has just been listed on first exchange.

https://bittrex.com/Market/?MarketName=BTC-BTL

Let's see the pricing going up. Mine it while you still can, hehe.
Whoever screamed scam and that the dev will sell the premined on the exchange will cry now.

Welcome to Bitcoin 2.0

Dotcommie

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

http://www.gputechconf.com/page/home.html

Surprised this NVIDIA event wasn't posted here. Watching it now while working

**Just announced, next gen Nvidia GPU (after Maxwell) is Pascal**

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: djm34 on March 25, 2014, 09:48:40 AM

8mh/s for the 780ti (non shared memory, the one with shared memory gives 9.5mh)
Did you recompile with compute 3.5, it may-be a little faster.
Actually, this coin is really a cpu coin, my 3770 gets around 1.1mh/s (6 threads)

groestl, as implemented now, does a massive amount of random access lookups in S-box tables derived from AES.

CPUs have a bit of an advantage due to their big data caches. So the absolute speed-up of a GPU isn't
that great. Maybe factor 10.

By the way, according to some information I got an AMD R9 290X only does around 6.5 MHash/s. Can anyone confirm this? If so, we've got another nVidia coin here.

Christian

Rasdisputin

newbie

Activity: 39

Merit: 0

Within the last day or so, cudaminer has been "hanging" after mining some time. The time between accepts always varies a bit, but now it's 1,2,3, or even 10 minutes. Sometimes it resumes sometimes it doesn't Not getting any invalids, but there does seem to be some sort of error?

I'm running a 750ti factory OC + a little more. Reducing it to stock clock doesn't seem to fix the issue.

https://i.imgur.com/umIc791.jpg

6 minutes later it's trucking along just fine, still slower, but no errors. Runs for a minute.. same thing again for a few minutes. Huh

Odeyin

member

Activity: 86

Merit: 10

CBuchner:

For all. Please forgive my ignorance, but I know they have done Bayesian calculation in the BTC world; do you believe that this could be done in the Scrypt world? If so, would this: http://sourceforge.net/projects/bayesclasses/?source=dlp help?

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

8mh/s for the 780ti (non shared memory, the one with shared memory gives 9.5mh)
Did you recompile with compute 3.5, it may-be a little faster.
Actually, this coin is really a cpu coin, my 3770 gets around 1.1mh/s (6 threads)

ivanlabrie

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

How much are you guys getting with groestl?

10mh/s between my 780 and 750ti seems kinda low.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: shadypepe on March 25, 2014, 09:17:21 AM

Populace coin, I love how sophisticated their pr strategy is:

Quote from: truckythin on March 25, 2014, 02:42:50 AM

Quote from: a98879887 on March 25, 2014, 01:49:19 AM

PopulaceCoin is very good! Look forward to the future！

Quote from: baiyunfei on March 25, 2014, 02:40:15 AM

POC, we are optimistic about him, a lot of potential for currency

Quote from: ?? on ??

This is very good coin

Quote from: caideguang on March 24, 2014, 09:48:30 PM

This very good, I support POC

Quote from: 410226470 on March 24, 2014, 08:29:18 PM

PopulaceCoin is very good coin!

QfjPfSj4ovFzRgVKoH24Lu5noN6WUBGyB1

Those posts have same common things, lol lol lol

All these algorithms are already done for gpu for other coins, right? Should be simple..

apparently, I didn't pay attention to that, but it already exists for gpu, as it seems to be "just" the quark algo...

shadypepe

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Populace coin, I love how sophisticated their pr strategy is:

Quote from: truckythin on March 25, 2014, 02:42:50 AM

Quote from: a98879887 on March 25, 2014, 01:49:19 AM

PopulaceCoin is very good! Look forward to the future！

Quote from: baiyunfei on March 25, 2014, 02:40:15 AM

POC, we are optimistic about him, a lot of potential for currency

Quote from: ?? on ??

This is very good coin

Quote from: caideguang on March 24, 2014, 09:48:30 PM

This very good, I support POC

Quote from: 410226470 on March 24, 2014, 08:29:18 PM

PopulaceCoin is very good coin!

QfjPfSj4ovFzRgVKoH24Lu5noN6WUBGyB1

Those posts have same common things, lol lol lol

All these algorithms are already done for gpu for other coins, right? Should be simple..

ivanlabrie

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Quote from: djm34 on March 25, 2014, 09:02:19 AM

may-be of interest: populace coin
"Based on super secure Hash which includes six kind of Encryption Algorithm (blake, bmw, groestl, jh, keccak, skein）and nine round of operation, POC can be only extracted by CPU, not by Asic or Gpu, to avoid operation monopoly, Which keeps high participatory and strong security."

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annpocpopulacecoin-v11-no-premine-ultra-secure-fairness-and-justice-502135

lol, the Christian duo will crack that in two days.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

may-be of interest: populace coin
"Based on super secure Hash which includes six kind of Encryption Algorithm (blake, bmw, groestl, jh, keccak, skein）and nine round of operation, POC can be only extracted by CPU, not by Asic or Gpu, to avoid operation monopoly, Which keeps high participatory and strong security."

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annpocpopulacecoin-v11-no-premine-ultra-secure-fairness-and-justice-502135

liomojo1

hero member

Activity: 676

Merit: 500

ok lets write the core clock then , not the + ovrclock , cause it is different for all cards.
I get stable overclock of core for minig 1280-1300 and memory 3150. Grin

But this card cant make it that much , so i keep it at 1200 and mem 2750.

binhpx

newbie

Activity: 40

Merit: 0

Quote from: liomojo1 on March 25, 2014, 07:01:38 AM

Quote from: binhpx on March 25, 2014, 06:20:08 AM

Quote from: terrapinflyer on March 25, 2014, 06:03:21 AM

So I have one GeForce MSI 750 ti that just does not want to work with cudaminer. It crashes the drivers immediately after starting up cudaminer. The card displays just fine and is running stock. I have isolated and started the system with just the card in question in several different slots. I have removed and reinstalled the drivers several times as well. At this point Im out of ideas, so Im wondering if anyone else has experienced this issue?

System:
ASRock H81 Pro BTC
ntel Celeron G1830
G.SKILL 4GB Model F3-12800CL9D-4GBNQ
Windows 7
Running the newest Nvidia drivers
6 GeForce MSI 750 ti's

Do you overlock it ? If yes,return to default then start again.I'm mining with 750Ti good

I have the same rig , same cpu, same board only 8gb ram and 6 evga oc 750ti. First trouble was that i couldnt get all cards up but it turned out , a bad riser . and now i am minig with no trouble. I had some crashes when i used the onboard video. I suggest you to disable it in the bios , set primary vga to pci-e and disable multiple monitors option.
Open a new cudaminer for every card , cause if one crashes, only this cudaminer crashes not the whole 6 crads. I have one card that has max memory overclock +300 and it crashed the whole system . So i keep it not overclocked. Others +80 core +400 mem.

Core 220-250 and mem 500 would be okay for mining stable with hashrate arround 297

liomojo1

hero member

Activity: 676

Merit: 500

Quote from: binhpx on March 25, 2014, 06:20:08 AM

Quote from: terrapinflyer on March 25, 2014, 06:03:21 AM

So I have one GeForce MSI 750 ti that just does not want to work with cudaminer. It crashes the drivers immediately after starting up cudaminer. The card displays just fine and is running stock. I have isolated and started the system with just the card in question in several different slots. I have removed and reinstalled the drivers several times as well. At this point Im out of ideas, so Im wondering if anyone else has experienced this issue?

System:
ASRock H81 Pro BTC
ntel Celeron G1830
G.SKILL 4GB Model F3-12800CL9D-4GBNQ
Windows 7
Running the newest Nvidia drivers
6 GeForce MSI 750 ti's

Do you overlock it ? If yes,return to default then start again.I'm mining with 750Ti good

I have the same rig , same cpu, same board only 8gb ram and 6 evga oc 750ti. First trouble was that i couldnt get all cards up but it turned out , a bad riser . and now i am minig with no trouble. I had some crashes when i used the onboard video. I suggest you to disable it in the bios , set primary vga to pci-e and disable multiple monitors option.
Open a new cudaminer for every card , cause if one crashes, only this cudaminer crashes not the whole 6 crads. I have one card that has max memory overclock +300 and it crashed the whole system . So i keep it not overclocked. Others +80 core +400 mem.

hellgast

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Hello
I cannot compile cudaminer against cuda6..

Quote

/usr/bin/ld: wrapnvml.o: undefined reference to symbol 'dlclose@@GLIBC_2.2.5'
/usr/lib/libdl.so.2: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

binhpx

newbie

Activity: 40

Merit: 0

Quote from: terrapinflyer on March 25, 2014, 06:03:21 AM

So I have one GeForce MSI 750 ti that just does not want to work with cudaminer. It crashes the drivers immediately after starting up cudaminer. The card displays just fine and is running stock. I have isolated and started the system with just the card in question in several different slots. I have removed and reinstalled the drivers several times as well. At this point Im out of ideas, so Im wondering if anyone else has experienced this issue?

System:
ASRock H81 Pro BTC
ntel Celeron G1830
G.SKILL 4GB Model F3-12800CL9D-4GBNQ
Windows 7
Running the newest Nvidia drivers
6 GeForce MSI 750 ti's

Do you overlock it ? If yes,return to default then start again.I'm mining with 750Ti good

terrapinflyer

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

So I have one GeForce MSI 750 ti that just does not want to work with cudaminer. It crashes the drivers immediately after starting up cudaminer. The card displays just fine and is running stock. I have isolated and started the system with just the card in question in several different slots. I have removed and reinstalled the drivers several times as well. At this point Im out of ideas, so Im wondering if anyone else has experienced this issue?

System:
ASRock H81 Pro BTC
ntel Celeron G1830
G.SKILL 4GB Model F3-12800CL9D-4GBNQ
Windows 7
Running the newest Nvidia drivers
6 GeForce MSI 750 ti's

vlax352

member

Activity: 95

Merit: 10

Christian, is it posible to implement X11 algo into cc miner?
from my point of view it seems simpler than it was to do it into cudaminer ...?

christian1980

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Dotcommie on March 25, 2014, 01:25:20 AM

Quote from: reznor on March 25, 2014, 12:52:21 AM

Quote from: cvax on March 24, 2014, 11:32:11 PM

Quote from: Dotcommie on March 24, 2014, 09:34:10 PM

Here are my results with risers:

ASRock H81 BTC mobo with 4gb of ram on Win7 x64= only 5 EVGA FTW 750ti cards run stable
ASRock H81 BTC mobo with 8gb of ram on Win7 x64= all 6 EVGA FTW 750ti cards run stable

I get consistent 295-300khs on all cards with +20 core and +410 mem. I think if I go too much more than that it crashes. Since they're FTW cards, that comes out to 1209(1288 boost) clock and 1555 mem. I can probably go higher if tweaking them separately since I probably have at least 1 card that's a weak overclocker, but that is stable so I left it. I'm thinking I will get more without risers, but I have no way to test more than 1 on this board since it's only got 1 16x slot. **Just an FYI, but GPU-Z is saying boost is 1288 but Precision X is actually reporting 1330-1350 for clocks**

On my other rig with Gigabyte 750ti's, I should have researched more instead of jumping on the cheapest board simply because it came with a freebie mpcie ssd, but that one seems to experience the degradation people are talking about when adding more cards.

That mobo is an ECS Z77H2-A4 with a Celeron G1620. Adding 4 cards is fine, but it seems to choose PCI-E 1.1 1x mode for every card on the 1x slots and only PCI-E 2.0 for the one plugged in to the first x16 slot. It boots with the 5th plugged in but only detects 3 cards then. I've tried the x16 slot with x1 and x16 risers and it still only did PCI-E 2.0, which is the only card getting full speed. ***I just checked the processor specs while I was typing this and realized the problem.... "PCI Express Revision 2.0 / Supports up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4"

I wonder how many other people cheaped out on processors and are getting similar declines in hashrate or incompatibilities with multiple cards. I surely can't be the only one. The ASRock board is running a socket 1150 i3 4130, so I'm guessing that's why I don't see a decline in khs. (Only 1155 cpus i5 and up supported PCIE v3)

I have an ASRock 970 Extreme 4 and some shit 170u CPUs. I have 4x Zotac 750Tis in my rigs and they don't slow down except for thermal slow downs. But then again my cards average around 280-295 to begin with.

So if that's the case then the issues of slow hashrates using pcie/usb riser depends on the hardware. So make sure your processor supports PCI-E ver. 3.0 but of course more hardware testing should support this claim. One thing if youre motherboard supports the PCI-E 3.0 then a graphics card supporting that bus speeds should be use when using risers.

Tech Specs: quick comparison)

PCI-E 2.0 5.0GT/s (raw bitrate) - 500MB/s (bandwidth per lane direction)
PCI-E 3.0 8.0GT/s (raw bitrate) - 1Gb/s (bandwidth per lane direction)

Wink

If you're running AMD I don't think the CPU bit applies, but it would be great if we could confirm the drastic slowdowns are only on Intel rigs running CPUs that don't support PCI-E 3.0.

I still don't know how people are getting 330khs out of their cards though. Anything close to 310 on my gigabyte and evga cards crashes cudaminer or the driver in a few minutes. I might be able to get it stable at 310 with lots of trial and error but haven't had the time or patience lately.

What are your settings for 310khs? I have got 2xZotac 750tiOC and 4xGigabyte 750tiOC in Asrock H81 Pro BTC and i was not able to break 300khs with risers.

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 653. (Read 3426976 times)