Author

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 952. (Read 3426921 times)

newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Does memory clock speed mater with this release ? I used to have mine under clocked by -500, i bumped it up to 0 and i gained 20khs.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
I missed the scenes for a few days. Now vertcoin is very profitable. VTC/BTC is almost 0.001 now.
Could you tell me some tips to configure Fermi cards for Vertcoin ?

I was thinking about VTC, but the difficulty is up in the skies and with my hashrate (126 khashes) it would take roughly 12 days on average to solo a block and pool mining is not that exciting (with a single card I'm more about fun than profitability).

MRC is fun though, especially if/when the price will pick up.

On another note, if anyone still has autotune crashing in the middle, just revert overclocking to stock speeds. You can change it back once you're hashing.

I you want fun try out ccoin, youll see some blocks an hour with your card/speed. Smiley
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annscrypt0-premineccoin-launched-earn-some-ccoins-now-404084
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
If you increase the power target to 120-130% you should get around 720khash

I've been feeling the need for better then Stock OC speed, where is the Skyn3t Bios located? I've found several sketchy DL's available but none form the source. Is there a host that is best to get this from?

It's on the overclock.net forum http://www.overclock.net/t/1438886/official-nvidia-gtx-780-ti-owners-club
I used it during a couple of day, and finally I did a bios mod myself to just change the TDP limit. However, I am thinking to try it again...
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
coming from previous version, my gtx 560 ti goes down from ~168kh to ~144kh using the same settings: -H 1 -i 0 -l F8x16 -C 1

autotune is even worse (i redownloaded the hotfix!), choosing F16x13 for ~130kh

anyone else here with gtx 560 ti?

yes, experiencing drop in performance too.  I only get around 105-110kh with the new version.

apart from scrypt-jane support there really are no goodies for Fermi owners in this release. The scrypt miners might want to stick to one of the December releases...
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
If you increase the power target to 120-130% you should get around 720khash

I've been feeling the need for better then Stock OC speed, where is the Skyn3t Bios located? I've found several sketchy DL's available but none form the source. Is there a host that is best to get this from?

For 780 TI only: http://www.overclock.net/t/1438886/official-nvidia-gtx-780-ti-owners-club

He has a bios for 780, Titan as well
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
coming from previous version, my gtx 560 ti goes down from ~168kh to ~144kh using the same settings: -H 1 -i 0 -l F8x16 -C 1

autotune is even worse (i redownloaded the hotfix!), choosing F16x13 for ~130kh

anyone else here with gtx 560 ti?

yes, experiencing drop in performance too.  I only get around 105-110kh with the new version.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
If you increase the power target to 120-130% you should get around 720khash

I've been feeling the need for better then Stock OC speed, where is the Skyn3t Bios located? I've found several sketchy DL's available but none form the source. Is there a host that is best to get this from?
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
I missed the scenes for a few days. Now vertcoin is very profitable. VTC/BTC is almost 0.001 now.
Could you tell me some tips to configure Fermi cards for Vertcoin ?

I was thinking about VTC, but the difficulty is up in the skies and with my hashrate (126 khashes) it would take roughly 12 days on average to solo a block and pool mining is not that exciting (with a single card I'm more about fun than profitability).

MRC is fun though, especially if/when the price will pick up.

On another note, if anyone still has autotune crashing in the middle, just revert overclocking to stock speeds. You can change it back once you're hashing.
hero member
Activity: 676
Merit: 500
Please share and what are you minig , How did you get these 305-330khs/s on scrypt or scrypt jane Huh?
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
GTX 760 speed went from 305 oc to 331 oc. Very nice! But the best part is that the temperature dropped down amazing 6-7°C. Nice job! Smiley

Any news on Cuda 6.0? You think it will boost mining speeds more than it is now?



Fellow 760 g x owner, share your config plz Smiley only getting 306kh/s
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
coming from previous version, my gtx 560 ti goes down from ~168kh to ~144kh using the same settings: -H 1 -i 0 -l F8x16 -C 1

autotune is even worse (i redownloaded the hotfix!), choosing F16x13 for ~130kh

anyone else here with gtx 560 ti?

Same issues.
Autotune is worse with 2-2 and the hotfix version. The F16x13 does not even rank top 5compared  in the 12-18 version.
Tried manually doing many settings. Cannot get the performance i had before.
12-18 Had 211 warps , 2-2 has 208 Warps ? Is this why?

If anyone is able to get more or equal performance from a 560 ti let us know, thanks.!
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
2 EVGA 780TI reference models with Skyn3t's bios. Per the other posts on this thread, iv tried many combos of C/H/m with T at 15x24 with no luck

-C 2 -H 1 -m 1 -l T15x24 runs at 20khs no matter what C/H/m is at

Best auto was T480x1 at 620khs

This new version doesn't work so well for me Sad

Try progressively lowering it from x24 down to 20 and maybe even lower, see if you get the best results with x20 as some of us do

Thank you sir, very kind of you to help. T15x16 is running at 685khs! Cheesy

cards running at 1188mhz, +105% Power Target, default voltage
x16 gave you the best results? Or did you lower it to that at once instead of testing each 15x24-16? Would just like to know since it's so strange that people are getting extremely different results with the new kernel, with the old one it was very similar for everyone with the same settings if you had the same card and clockspeeds etc.
you have to display the autotune values and search for "bumps".
However the 15x24 problem is kind of funny. It works apparently for certain 780ti (EVGA sc) and not for other (EVGA ref.). may-be the driver version but 15x24 was not working for me with the previous driver version either


Yeah it is weird, i went progressively from x24 all the way to x1 and x16 gave the best results.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
2 EVGA 780TI reference models with Skyn3t's bios. Per the other posts on this thread, iv tried many combos of C/H/m with T at 15x24 with no luck

-C 2 -H 1 -m 1 -l T15x24 runs at 20khs no matter what C/H/m is at

Best auto was T480x1 at 620khs

This new version doesn't work so well for me Sad

Try progressively lowering it from x24 down to 20 and maybe even lower, see if you get the best results with x20 as some of us do

Thank you sir, very kind of you to help. T15x16 is running at 685khs! Cheesy

cards running at 1188mhz, +105% Power Target, default voltage

So x16 gave you the best results? Or did you lower it to that at once instead of testing each 15x24-16? Would just like to know since it's so strange that people are getting extremely different results with the new kernel, with the old one it was very similar for everyone with the same settings if you had the same card and clockspeeds etc.
you have to display the autotune values and search for "bumps".
However the 15x24 problem is kind of funny. It works apparently for certain 780ti (EVGA sc) and not for other (EVGA ref.). may-be the driver version but 15x24 was not working for me with the previous driver version either
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
2 EVGA 780TI reference models with Skyn3t's bios. Per the other posts on this thread, iv tried many combos of C/H/m with T at 15x24 with no luck

-C 2 -H 1 -m 1 -l T15x24 runs at 20khs no matter what C/H/m is at

Best auto was T480x1 at 620khs

This new version doesn't work so well for me Sad

Try progressively lowering it from x24 down to 20 and maybe even lower, see if you get the best results with x20 as some of us do

Thank you sir, very kind of you to help. T15x16 is running at 685khs! Cheesy

cards running at 1188mhz, +105% Power Target, default voltage
If you increase the power target to 120-130% you should get around 720khash


Yeah i had it down that far because im runnig on stock coolers, and they were running at 82c.. they seem to be running much cooler with this new release so i'll be pumping up the overclocks.

Im going to be water cooling some time next week, just waiting on UPS to deliver my parts Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
2 EVGA 780TI reference models with Skyn3t's bios. Per the other posts on this thread, iv tried many combos of C/H/m with T at 15x24 with no luck

-C 2 -H 1 -m 1 -l T15x24 runs at 20khs no matter what C/H/m is at

Best auto was T480x1 at 620khs

This new version doesn't work so well for me Sad

Try progressively lowering it from x24 down to 20 and maybe even lower, see if you get the best results with x20 as some of us do

Thank you sir, very kind of you to help. T15x16 is running at 685khs! Cheesy

cards running at 1188mhz, +105% Power Target, default voltage
If you increase the power target to 120-130% you should get around 720khash
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
I have a pause command.

The command prompt closes anyways.

And the -O command works with 12-18, but not the newer ones, and every config, even the ones in this thread show to use it. So explain to me.

I have never seen a more rude author of a program. Abit peeved, infact.

-O requires an argument. If you don't give that, the programm will terminate.

If you really have an -O option at the end of the line without giving worker and password, then you're wasting my time.

the program arguments are explained with --help or in the README.txt
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
2 EVGA 780TI reference models with Skyn3t's bios. Per the other posts on this thread, iv tried many combos of C/H/m with T at 15x24 with no luck

-C 2 -H 1 -m 1 -l T15x24 runs at 20khs no matter what C/H/m is at

Best auto was T480x1 at 620khs

This new version doesn't work so well for me Sad

Try progressively lowering it from x24 down to 20 and maybe even lower, see if you get the best results with x20 as some of us do

Thank you sir, very kind of you to help. T15x16 is running at 685khs! Cheesy

cards running at 1188mhz, +105% Power Target, default voltage

So x16 gave you the best results? Or did you lower it to that at once instead of testing each 15x24-16? Would just like to know since it's so strange that people are getting extremely different results with the new kernel, with the old one it was very similar for everyone with the same settings if you had the same card and clockspeeds etc.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
2 EVGA 780TI reference models with Skyn3t's bios. Per the other posts on this thread, iv tried many combos of C/H/m with T at 15x24 with no luck

-C 2 -H 1 -m 1 -l T15x24 runs at 20khs no matter what C/H/m is at

Best auto was T480x1 at 620khs

This new version doesn't work so well for me Sad

Try progressively lowering it from x24 down to 20 and maybe even lower, see if you get the best results with x20 as some of us do

Thank you sir, very kind of you to help. T15x16 is running at 685khs! Cheesy

cards running at 1188mhz, +105% Power Target, default voltage
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
2 EVGA 780TI reference models with Skyn3t's bios. Per the other posts on this thread, iv tried many combos of C/H/m with T at 15x24 with no luck

-C 2 -H 1 -m 1 -l T15x24 runs at 20khs no matter what C/H/m is at

Best auto was T480x1 at 620khs

This new version doesn't work so well for me Sad

Try progressively lowering it from x24 down to 20 and maybe even lower, see if you get the best results with x20 as some of us do
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
2 EVGA 780TI reference models with Skyn3t's bios. Per the other posts on this thread, iv tried many combos of C/H/m with T at 15x24 with no luck

-C 2 -H 1 -m 1 -l T15x24 runs at 20khs no matter what C/H/m is at

Best auto was T480x1 at 620khs

This new version doesn't work so well for me Sad

Try T15x16 (in script) it should work better
Jump to: