Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Decentralized Machine Learning - page 59. (Read 6229 times)

member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 08:34:44 PM
I agree with previous comments. They are working so hard. I hope society will understand big advantages of this project and help it to become stronger.
It will happen someday. But now I have question. Tell me please about Proof of Ecosystem program.
I am not sure that I understand it correctly, but it is certain actions that will prove the importance and value of DML ecosystem.
Thanks. It become clearer to me now. Can you tell me about one action that you’ve meant? I want to understand it completely.
Recently developers have launched a contest for talented people, who want to try the system first. You just need to offer to the team some interesting thoughts about the platform.
Wow. It is a great opportunity. Does anyone can try to participate in this contest?
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 08:28:06 PM
I agree with previous comments. They are working so hard. I hope society will understand big advantages of this project and help it to become stronger.
It will happen someday. But now I have question. Tell me please about Proof of Ecosystem program.
I am not sure that I understand it correctly, but it is certain actions that will prove the importance and value of DML ecosystem.
Thanks. It become clearer to me now. Can you tell me about one action that you’ve meant? I want to understand it completely.
Recently developers have launched a contest for talented people, who want to try the system first. You just need to offer to the team some interesting thoughts about the platform.
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 08:21:14 PM
I agree with previous comments. They are working so hard. I hope society will understand big advantages of this project and help it to become stronger.
It will happen someday. But now I have question. Tell me please about Proof of Ecosystem program.
I am not sure that I understand it correctly, but it is certain actions that will prove the importance and value of DML ecosystem.
Thanks. It become clearer to me now. Can you tell me about one action that you’ve meant? I want to understand it completely.
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 08:16:34 PM
I agree with previous comments. They are working so hard. I hope society will understand big advantages of this project and help it to become stronger.
It will happen someday. But now I have question. Tell me please about Proof of Ecosystem program.
I am not sure that I understand it correctly, but it is certain actions that will prove the importance and value of DML ecosystem.
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 08:11:29 PM
I agree with previous comments. They are working so hard. I hope society will understand big advantages of this project and help it to become stronger.
It will happen someday. But now I have question. Tell me please about Proof of Ecosystem program.
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 08:00:17 PM
I agree with previous comments. They are working so hard. I hope society will understand big advantages of this project and help it to become stronger.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 07:54:45 PM
It is great to see that this project is growing fast. I hope they will go on like this.
I agree with you. But I’m kinda disappointed about the change of token generation date. I hoped it will be sooner.
Don’t worry about it. I think this decision is very correct for current situations. Besides, devs just fulfilled community requires. That’s all. If you have something more to say you can wright to devs
What do you mean?
I just wanted to say, that in case of some interesting proposal you can contact with developers.
Ok. But I’m not a developer of algorithms. How I can I help with in this case.
I think the team will be happy to hear some new ideas. They will even give rewards for best thoughts. You need to read more accurately the white paper and go for it.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 07:50:19 PM
It is great to see that this project is growing fast. I hope they will go on like this.
I agree with you. But I’m kinda disappointed about the change of token generation date. I hoped it will be sooner.
Don’t worry about it. I think this decision is very correct for current situations. Besides, devs just fulfilled community requires. That’s all. If you have something more to say you can wright to devs
What do you mean?
I just wanted to say, that in case of some interesting proposal you can contact with developers.
Ok. But I’m not a developer of algorithms. How I can I help with in this case.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 07:43:52 PM
It is great to see that this project is growing fast. I hope they will go on like this.
I agree with you. But I’m kinda disappointed about the change of token generation date. I hoped it will be sooner.
Don’t worry about it. I think this decision is very correct for current situations. Besides, devs just fulfilled community requires. That’s all. If you have something more to say you can wright to devs
What do you mean?
I just wanted to say, that in case of some interesting proposal you can contact with developers.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 07:38:54 PM
It is great to see that this project is growing fast. I hope they will go on like this.
I agree with you. But I’m kinda disappointed about the change of token generation date. I hoped it will be sooner.
Don’t worry about it. I think this decision is very correct for current situations. Besides, devs just fulfilled community requires. That’s all. If you have something more to say you can wright to devs
What do you mean?
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 07:30:41 PM
It is great to see that this project is growing fast. I hope they will go on like this.
I agree with you. But I’m kinda disappointed about the change of token generation date. I hoped it will be sooner.
Don’t worry about it. I think this decision is very correct for current situations. Besides, devs just fulfilled community requires. That’s all. If you have something more to say you can wright to devs
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 07:23:36 PM
It is great to see that this project is growing fast. I hope they will go on like this.
I agree with you. But I’m kinda disappointed about the change of token generation date. I hoped it will be sooner.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 07:17:58 PM
It is great to see that this project is growing fast. I hope they will go on like this.
hero member
Activity: 1708
Merit: 749
Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com
April 01, 2018, 04:16:44 PM
I see they have a prototype or prototype of the future system for the github. Someone already watched it? Someone already tried to figure this out somehow?
Yes it really is, they have a ready-made prototype. And for what you ask?
I'm just trying to figure out at which stage this project is currently located. Also it would be desirable to know what exactly this model represents, which is in public access.
Well, if you look at the road map, at the moment the project is at the stage Token Generation Event and Launch of DML Protocol Gen 0 (DML Algo Marketplace) Beta. so what exactly are you asking about the prototype?
I'm just wondering, maybe there are people understanding in programming and who look at this prototype and analyzed it. I'm interested in knowing the opinions of people who understand something about this area.
I doubt that there is a person here who understands something in this area. I mean machine learning and neural networks. This is a rather complicated technology and I do not think there will be specialists in this field who could answer your questions.

That's quite a pessimistic view on the abilities of the audience here Wink I think there might be someone who could audit the code and I think it would be very helpful for all who can't do that.

Machine learning is a tough topic and there might be some people who know a little bit, but real experts are rare in the industry.
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 508
Bisq Market Day - March 20th 2023
April 01, 2018, 03:33:09 AM
I see they have a prototype or prototype of the future system for the github. Someone already watched it? Someone already tried to figure this out somehow?
Yes it really is, they have a ready-made prototype. And for what you ask?
I'm just trying to figure out at which stage this project is currently located. Also it would be desirable to know what exactly this model represents, which is in public access.
Well, if you look at the road map, at the moment the project is at the stage Token Generation Event and Launch of DML Protocol Gen 0 (DML Algo Marketplace) Beta. so what exactly are you asking about the prototype?
I'm just wondering, maybe there are people understanding in programming and who look at this prototype and analyzed it. I'm interested in knowing the opinions of people who understand something about this area.
I doubt that there is a person here who understands something in this area. I mean machine learning and neural networks. This is a rather complicated technology and I do not think there will be specialists in this field who could answer your questions.

That's quite a pessimistic view on the abilities of the audience here Wink I think there might be someone who could audit the code and I think it would be very helpful for all who can't do that.
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
March 31, 2018, 09:09:36 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm...   Huh
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.
But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?
Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as githab. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.
In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.
I hope that this will also be encouraged by the system in the form of additional tokens, as far as I know, so it will be.
By the way, I did not think about it at once. Yes, such work should be encouraged, otherwise what's the point of doing this. For the sake of enthusiasm? Somehow it looks dubious. So the promotion in the form of tokens looks very nice!
Yes, I totally agree, it remains only to find out exactly what amounts of promotion can be discussed  Cheesy
member
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
March 31, 2018, 09:09:21 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm...   Huh
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.
But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?
Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as githab. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.
In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.
I hope that this will also be encouraged by the system in the form of additional tokens, as far as I know, so it will be.
By the way, I did not think about it at once. Yes, such work should be encouraged, otherwise what's the point of doing this. For the sake of enthusiasm? Somehow it looks dubious. So the promotion in the form of tokens looks very nice!
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
March 31, 2018, 09:09:05 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm...   Huh
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.
But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?
Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as githab. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.
In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.
I hope that this will also be encouraged by the system in the form of additional tokens, as far as I know, so it will be.
member
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
March 31, 2018, 09:08:48 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm...   Huh
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.
But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?
Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as githab. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.
In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
March 31, 2018, 09:07:43 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm...   Huh
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.
But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?
Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as githab. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.
Pages:
Jump to: