crypto-rainbow
It can be seen that the amount taken into account before the start of the fourth round was 1841.6080694
Which is more than 90% of the received in three rounds 2041.6110694 (90% = 1837.44996246)
So I participated in the fourth round.
All coins were moved to one address inside the wallet with this transaction before the start of the fourth round: -0.001
444887d58490731987a6abab021ff7cb20c8d127ee2289435ca0af2e5c83a7fd-000
Sums
71.66746297
8.90698034
Are surcharges for the first and second rounds, because due to distribution errors, they transferred smaller amounts. 71.66746297 was translating to me a crypto-rainbow when I wrote to him at PM about the surcharge. If your algorithm did not take into account these amounts, why did I participate in the fourth round? Why did not your algorithm take them into account?
I want to understand where the excess of the limit is 90%? As for the splitting of the amounts, I transferred everything to the main address before the start of the fourth round. And in general about such a probability it was necessary to write a long time ago, not everyone is well versed in the mechanism of transactions. Or it was necessary to prohibit spending from the balance. But it was allowed to spend up to 10%.
I do not think that I have broken even one condition. Therefore, blacklisting is an error.
It can be seen that the amount taken into account before the start of the fourth round was 1841.6080694
Which is more than 90% of the received in three rounds 2041.6110694 (90% = 1837.44996246)
So I participated in the fourth round.
All coins were moved to one address inside the wallet with this transaction before the start of the fourth round: -0.001
444887d58490731987a6abab021ff7cb20c8d127ee2289435ca0af2e5c83a7fd-000
Sums
71.66746297
8.90698034
Are surcharges for the first and second rounds, because due to distribution errors, they transferred smaller amounts. 71.66746297 was translating to me a crypto-rainbow when I wrote to him at PM about the surcharge. If your algorithm did not take into account these amounts, why did I participate in the fourth round? Why did not your algorithm take them into account?
I want to understand where the excess of the limit is 90%? As for the splitting of the amounts, I transferred everything to the main address before the start of the fourth round. And in general about such a probability it was necessary to write a long time ago, not everyone is well versed in the mechanism of transactions. Or it was necessary to prohibit spending from the balance. But it was allowed to spend up to 10%.
I do not think that I have broken even one condition. Therefore, blacklisting is an error.
lol, when dev blacklist you, they are 100% sure you did some fraud, there's no guessing there. You of course know the best, just check the OP rules, do you have multiple accounts? did you dump more than 10%? did you fud, etc.
Thanks to SSowellSVT 
