the airdrop amount HAS to be tied to one wallet to stop the account farmers. the airdropped amount is fixed in the coins structure. so, how do we come up with a fair distribution? just throw out coins to whoever is in line?
I might have a proposition.
I think the new weight system is a good idea, but just not set on the right people.
lets say they everything in the airdrop has a factor or 1x (for EVERYONE). Then we do a table like this for all the coins that were not received in a airdrop:
- 0-10k (1.2x)
- 10k-20k (2x)
- 20k-30k (3x)
- 30k-50k (4x)
- 50k+ (5x)
That way every one that buys ALOT would receives more airdrop (increasing their weight).
MODs are the one that have the biggest airdrop (because of their support) so even with a factor of 1x (every airdrop balance) they would still do quite a lot, like 3-5k per week even if they dont buy any.
Of course those numbers could be different and i would even say they should be voted by the community. The main purpose of this is to provide a buying support, every coins that were bought will provide a support and it will also make the price go higher since people will have to buy more in order to get more. That way even if everyone receives less coins, those buyers will make the price rise and everyone will be happy.
If you check carefully every large balance have ground by 300% in the last 3 months but their total value is worth less than 3 months ago, this is because theres no buyers. Check all the 400 airdrop members and only a dozen have more than the airdrop amount!
At the end if all the coins get distributed and we dont have more buyers, we will all have alot of coins with no value. I rather have less coins with buyers backing the price under me!
Community could even provide different scenarios and they could be voted. Right now people complains because of the rules because they decided by the team, but if they rules were picked by the community wouldn't it be better? (By the way bitcore team did that to pick their distribution model for their airdrop)
What do you think?
I rather have 10k coins at 5$ than 30k at 1$What do you think about this guys?
I think that there are some really interesting ideas in your post and I appreciate that you have this constructive approach. I personally do not complain about my airdrop amount, even though it is a bit lower than it would be according to the old rules.
But what I am really worried about is the impact of the new rules on our community. I saw a lot of flames and negativity connected to this topic. Whatever the airdrop rules are, they should rather put our community together and make it stronger, instead of splitting it (I know, there is nothing like ideal rules and it is not possible to make everyone satisfied, but I believe that there are things which could and should be improved).
I have no objections when the main contributors or investors get more than the other, the problem is that the gap between the "rich" and the "poor" is being increased too much by the new rules. And the situations when such gap is becoming too big often do not end well. Therefore I believe that the rules need some change, maybe just a simple adjustment of the "factors" would be sufficient.
We should show to the cryptoworld that we are able to effectively solve our disputes. This would make our project stronger and I believe that the new investors and supporters would appreciate it.
And to your last question:
"What do you think?
I rather have 10k coins at 5$ than 30k at 1$"
This is exactly the point, I am definitely for the first option
Therefore I also believe that some adjustment of the rules would be a win-win situation for all as the smaller hodlers would get more Onions and the bigger hodlers would be more than enough compensated by the increase of price.
