I guess I'm holding my coins for now.
Deposit/ withdraw is still disabled on Poloniex which is a little concerning to me.
Topic: [ANN] DigitalNote |XDN| - ICCO Announce - NEWS - page 106. (Read 450276 times)
Think many people here are focused on Crypto-Fiat gains... as exciting as that sounds. I have not forgotten why I got into crypto and don't intend to sell for fiat. Sure this has been said before, but dont lose your focus. I understand it's part of the trading game, but think of it as a long term investment and try to contribute and protect all of advances being made, in all cryptocurrency. At some point I think we will see big players back innovative tech (perhaps they already are), but until that information becomes public, be patient and let a strong foundation of technology and supporters be built. I hope to see markets and applications to emerge out of all the different blockchains, XDN stands apart as having great potential in both of these areas, as long as enthusiasts don't tear it down before it's built. Know it feels like markets are moving slow compared to the breakneck speed of others, but maybe we are watching a strong foundation coming together. If someone can give me evidence why i shouldn't trust the development team I'd be interested to hear it, speculation doesn't interest me.
XEM/NEM pumped because of their supposed use by financial institutions in Japan.
XDN does not have that as far as I know......
Hi!
Just wait for it. Nobody has said the XDN would rise from now on equal.
But where XMR goes, you can see.
I have nothing against the XMR, only I would buy me now no more.
Just wait for it. Nobody has said the XDN would rise from now on equal.
But where XMR goes, you can see.
I have nothing against the XMR, only I would buy me now no more.
C'mon... XDN can do the same as XEM did a few month ago
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/nem/
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/nem/
Hi!
If i still hold XMRs, i would also worry!
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/monero/
But if someone want to sell his XDNs, just PM to me!
Thanks dNote!
If i still hold XMRs, i would also worry!
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/monero/
But if someone want to sell his XDNs, just PM to me!
Thanks dNote!
those day xdn has drop alot,I am very sick becaus i buy on the hill 
...
I can tell you XDN-project has no connection with minergate = bytecoin = hitbtc = freewallet = changelly = cointelegraph = chainradar etc and never had. We are only using bytecoin/cryptonote source code (and you know, we made lots of new stuff).
And another thing - we need much more XDN and FCN mining pools based on open source software.
I can tell you XDN-project has no connection with minergate = bytecoin = hitbtc = freewallet = changelly = cointelegraph = chainradar etc and never had. We are only using bytecoin/cryptonote source code (and you know, we made lots of new stuff).
And another thing - we need much more XDN and FCN mining pools based on open source software.
Was mostly interested in the bolded part, but your response re: more pools made me think of a more specific question - why is it that only minergate is going to support merge mining? There is no open source software for merge-mining is there? How can you ask for more mining pools based on open source software if none exists? Are you planning to release open source merge mining pool software?
as far as i know, currently, there is no open source pool that can do mm.
there is a pool with FCN support (not mm, single FCN mining) https://github.com/fancoder/cryptonote-universal-pool and i believe this pool can be updated to mm.
Also there is a software called SoloMiner for CryptoNote mm https://github.com/amphibia/SoloMiner but it should be updated to FCN 2.0.
So now you can do a common FCN mining on both pool or solo.
After all HF and updates, we are planning to update cryptonote-universal-pool to mm support
Also we may touch SoloMiner and update it too.
...
I can tell you XDN-project has no connection with minergate = bytecoin = hitbtc = freewallet = changelly = cointelegraph = chainradar etc and never had. We are only using bytecoin/cryptonote source code (and you know, we made lots of new stuff).
And another thing - we need much more XDN and FCN mining pools based on open source software.
I can tell you XDN-project has no connection with minergate = bytecoin = hitbtc = freewallet = changelly = cointelegraph = chainradar etc and never had. We are only using bytecoin/cryptonote source code (and you know, we made lots of new stuff).
And another thing - we need much more XDN and FCN mining pools based on open source software.
Was mostly interested in the bolded part, but your response re: more pools made me think of a more specific question - why is it that only minergate is going to support merge mining? There is no open source software for merge-mining is there? How can you ask for more mining pools based on open source software if none exists? Are you planning to release open source merge mining pool software?
Quote
In my opinion the merge mining announcement of FCN by the XDN devs may be by the same people who once pushed for XMR merge mined with BCN (and thankfully failed). FCN was merged mined with BCN but largely abandoned. FCN and XDN (almost all mined just like BCN) mining rewards will be tiny but that is not the point. The point is that (besides an attempt to pump FCN and later XDN) this may be an attempt to increase Minergate hash rate (since only that pool offers this FCN merge mining). Dont use Minergate or fall for this obvious ploy to increase their hashrate: Don't fall for it. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16765740
It seems minergate = bytecoin = hitbtc = freewallet = changelly = cointelegraph = chainradar etc
https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/5b6a5t/dont_user_minergate/It seems minergate = bytecoin = hitbtc = freewallet = changelly = cointelegraph = chainradar etc
Is it true?
True about what?
We are making mm to protect XDN network, mm was not a very simple thing to implement (we were working on mm for the whole summer). That is why we took FCN! Also because FCN has a slow emission and some people don't like XDN fast emission (the idea of real Free Market Economy).
So for us the ONLY reason to start XDN mm and take FCN was to empower blockchain and make it more secure.
Minergate is the first mining pool implemented mm for FCN long time ago, i think it is obvious that they are implementing it now when FCN updated.
We can't comment minergate = bytecoin = hitbtc = freewallet = changelly = cointelegraph = chainradar etc connection, because we simply don't know. We have contacted minergate about upcoming hf few times.
I can tell you XDN-project has no connection with minergate = bytecoin = hitbtc = freewallet = changelly = cointelegraph = chainradar etc and never had. We are only using bytecoin/cryptonote source code (and you know, we made lots of new stuff).
And another thing - we need much more XDN and FCN mining pools based on open source software.
Quote
In my opinion the merge mining announcement of FCN by the XDN devs may be by the same people who once pushed for XMR merge mined with BCN (and thankfully failed). FCN was merged mined with BCN but largely abandoned. FCN and XDN (almost all mined just like BCN) mining rewards will be tiny but that is not the point. The point is that (besides an attempt to pump FCN and later XDN) this may be an attempt to increase Minergate hash rate (since only that pool offers this FCN merge mining). Dont use Minergate or fall for this obvious ploy to increase their hashrate: Don't fall for it. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16765740
It seems minergate = bytecoin = hitbtc = freewallet = changelly = cointelegraph = chainradar etc
https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/5b6a5t/dont_user_minergate/It seems minergate = bytecoin = hitbtc = freewallet = changelly = cointelegraph = chainradar etc
Is it true?
They hold this coin not on conviction, so it is better they go. It seems they missed the opportunity to sell on the last hype (or even bought more). Indeed not worth to talk about it.
i think im done with xdn.. im going to hold a couple thou just in case but after 2 years of waiting very little has come out of it.
I'm in a similar position and I think i have to agree.i think im done with xdn.. im going to hold a couple thou just in case but after 2 years of waiting very little has come out of it.
I'm in a similar position and I think i have to agree. i think im done with xdn.. im going to hold a couple thou just in case but after 2 years of waiting very little has come out of it.
And why exactly do you need to shared this with the world?
to mildly upset you. why do you feel the need to ask me why i feel the need?
i think im done with xdn.. im going to hold a couple thou just in case but after 2 years of waiting very little has come out of it.
And why exactly do you need to shared this with the world?
i think im done with xdn.. im going to hold a couple thou just in case but after 2 years of waiting very little has come out of it.
how long till merge mining?
Hello,
We are observing FCN 2.0.
It is a very important hardfork and everything should be great, but we must be prepared. Merged mining in XDN will be implemented as soon as we will verify all possible issues by observing a real FCN blockchain and making local XDN tests.
Our attention is with FCN this week, while we are testing XDN.
I think we will release source code of XDN MM update on Monday, and HF will be next week too.
Pools will need to update their daemons and possibly update their pool software.
Exchanges will only need to update to the latest XDN version.
FCN hashrate before HF: 200 kh/s
FCN hashrate now: 700 kh/s - x3 times.
Stay tuned.
I'm tired so much 
Please dump more on me
Please dump more on me
Jump to: