The risks of shared masternodes are fairly obvious and undeniable, a strong warning notice from the developers about their significantly elevated risk relative to other services is fine. But the risk is only significantly elevated, it's not on a different planet to the sh!t exchanges you're depending on and regularly recommending to new users.
I fail to see how developers are really making Dinero any better by attempting to dictate the method of usage and access to masternodes. Better to let the people decide on the risk/return profile they are willing to accept. Developers have no obligation to provide guarantees for 3rd party services, everyone knows that.
Blanket banning all discussion of shared mn's on your Discord channel obviously isn't legitimate spam filtering BTW. It is just suppression of free speech justified by protectionism, you are well within your right to do that despite it being strongly against the original crypto currency movement, but calling it spam filtering is bs.
@joku In no way are we suppressing free speech, we are not banning discussion or and we are certainly not dictating the methods of usage. Please actually read the notice before making such comments.I fail to see how developers are really making Dinero any better by attempting to dictate the method of usage and access to masternodes. Better to let the people decide on the risk/return profile they are willing to accept. Developers have no obligation to provide guarantees for 3rd party services, everyone knows that.
Blanket banning all discussion of shared mn's on your Discord channel obviously isn't legitimate spam filtering BTW. It is just suppression of free speech justified by protectionism, you are well within your right to do that despite it being strongly against the original crypto currency movement, but calling it spam filtering is bs.
We have legitimate concerns about an issue where many users face financial exposure.
We have in fact gone over and above to try and protect our users and in the first instance we are simply highlighting our concerns.
We never said, and we never have limited discussions on the topic, we have simply stated that any service providers advertising such services will be treated as spam.
Do you believe it is responsible to allow anyone / everyone to advertise such services?
For reference, we do not allow other advertising on our Discord either, you can call it bs if you want, I call it trying to do the right thing for users, and if you did read all the way to the end of the notice, you might have read the part where we invited proposals for solutions.
