one thing to discuss
how about with DMD 3.0 we have a 10:1 coin supply reduction
just something to think about
technical we can do it
all balance are reduced by 90% and all total coin related mechanics adapted
max 438k DMD (below a half million after 30+ years!)
maybe that amount of total coins would suite a coin with the name Diamond better?
opinions?
how about with DMD 3.0 we have a 10:1 coin supply reduction
just something to think about
technical we can do it
all balance are reduced by 90% and all total coin related mechanics adapted
max 438k DMD (below a half million after 30+ years!)
maybe that amount of total coins would suite a coin with the name Diamond better?
opinions?
@cryptonit - this equates to a 10:1 reverse split in the equity world. I am not sure that I understand the point of it other than just making the coin appear to be worth more.
agree with pokeytex
it's just a manipulation with the cost of the coin.
what's the point for holders of coin?
cryptonit you once wrote that the coins can cost through 2 years $5.
This is the magical option of increasing the cost?
and if you reduce the number of coins in 100 times, then 1 coin will cost a few Bitcoins?
this is some perverted version Zcash?
Zcash: Total coin supply: 21,000,000 (same as Bitcoin) the rate is currently at bittrex 1 Zcash more than 7 bitcoins.
you talk about some improvements in DMD 3.0, but at the same time offering a very strange version of the increase in the value of the coin.
I don't understand why this is reducing the amount of coins, so I oppose this.
the feedback is clear there wont be a change in amount of total coins
even if i think u misunderstand the intention
we start such discussions when we seek community feedback
and i say thx to everyone who gave his feedback
so what is the essence of this proposal?
Maybe it is better at once explain the logic of the proposed changes, then there was no misunderstanding?
