25k wall is not here anymore 
Weird - the order book was open all the way into .00120 range. It was interesting with over 25k being available for sale at .0009
Are you sure it was DMD? Missed that one, nothing above 0.00069 here.
Topic: [ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65% - page 565. (Read 1260677 times)
March 05, 2015, 12:57:17 PM
Weird - the order book was open all the way into .00120 range. It was interesting with over 25k being available for sale at .0009
Are you sure it was DMD? Missed that one, nothing above 0.00069 here.
March 05, 2015, 11:30:57 AM
25k wall is not here anymore
Weird - the order book was open all the way into .00120 range. It was interesting with over 25k being available for sale at .0009
March 05, 2015, 09:43:43 AM
Could we pls have the sig codes pls ? I would like to use it !
Sure,
this s why I made them for. Whoever needs them, PM me.
March 05, 2015, 06:37:35 AM
Hehe - has anyone taken a look at the sell walls on Cryptsy? 25,055 DMD's at .0009! Anyone want to take that one out? LOL
March 05, 2015, 02:00:37 AM
a few nice entries for sig contest
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10622422
express ur opinions there to make it easyer for us to decide
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10622422
express ur opinions there to make it easyer for us to decide
I like this one the best.... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10654196
Although it uses the "coin" name I am not sure we wanted to have that in our name?
pokeytex
its a design contest
we can modify text as we want
again a great thx to crazyivan for run this
you are real a person that act and not wait for others to do something!
such people are the people who get stuff done and move projects forward
Thx Crytonit, no big deal.
As all of you, I ve also adopted this coin and do not plan to stop until we reach our goal.
BTW, DMDs are getting out in the wild big time, we are at 920k, 80k more to go.
Whoever plans to buy, I suggest to do it now, we have only a few weeks left.
March 04, 2015, 02:54:18 PM
I wish the images in this thread could be bigger
Then, you can still look at the it:
March 04, 2015, 12:58:46 PM
I wish the images in this thread could be bigger
March 04, 2015, 08:25:16 AM
good I wonder how many coins you have to have in the portfolio to earn some decent mined in the portfolio.
March 04, 2015, 08:21:31 AM
we have no hurry
i think the promotion is to early now
more info about DMD v3 to be released
would add up and create lot additional effect
we should not sacrifice that synergies and promote to early
i think the promotion is to early now
more info about DMD v3 to be released
would add up and create lot additional effect
we should not sacrifice that synergies and promote to early
March 04, 2015, 07:14:29 AM
@TheMightyKnight
So what is the final tally for all of the press release contributions? Has anyone else stepped up with additional donations? I still pledge .1 BTC if others will come together and give a little more. -pokeytex
With the price of BTC rising are we any better off hitting the number?
So what is the final tally for all of the press release contributions? Has anyone else stepped up with additional donations? I still pledge .1 BTC if others will come together and give a little more. -pokeytex
With the price of BTC rising are we any better off hitting the number?
March 04, 2015, 06:54:51 AM
a few nice entries for sig contest
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10622422
express ur opinions there to make it easyer for us to decide
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10622422
express ur opinions there to make it easyer for us to decide
I like this one the best.... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10654196
Although it uses the "coin" name I am not sure we wanted to have that in our name?
pokeytex
its a design contest
we can modify text as we want
again a great thx to crazyivan for run this
you are real a person that act and not wait for others to do something!
such people are the people who get stuff done and move projects forward
March 04, 2015, 06:45:42 AM
a few nice entries for sig contest
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10622422
express ur opinions there to make it easyer for us to decide
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10622422
express ur opinions there to make it easyer for us to decide
I like this one the best.... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10654196
Although it uses the "coin" name I am not sure we wanted to have that in our name?
pokeytex
March 04, 2015, 03:13:04 AM
a few nice entries for sig contest
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10622422
express ur opinions there to make it easyer for us to decide
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10622422
express ur opinions there to make it easyer for us to decide
March 03, 2015, 10:01:27 PM
I would like the Reactor to be split into several staking wallets. Just seems more logical that way.
Edit: Are investors still receiving monthly account re investments? Is there a way to track this?
hi mate feel free to have a look at my dmd wallet address. its for cloud mining. and shows the reinvested numbersEdit: Are investors still receiving monthly account re investments? Is there a way to track this?
dGQr9GzEyvyLAW63NiH5oKXsr8VtLFhX5B
March 03, 2015, 07:09:44 PM
I would like the Reactor to be split into several staking wallets. Just seems more logical that way.
Edit: Are investors still receiving monthly account re investments? Is there a way to track this?
Edit: Are investors still receiving monthly account re investments? Is there a way to track this?
March 03, 2015, 04:39:42 PM
Why answer to FUD spread by Argon 
Why not simply ignore him as we did with other trolls ?
Answering their hate brings nothing.
Why not simply ignore him as we did with other trolls ?Answering their hate brings nothing.
Honestly, I was just wondering what the 2.0.4.1 update was about and why it was running on a main node without the source online. I wasn't trying to accuse anyone of anything. And cryptonit gave a reasonable response, so I'm not going to complain.
(Especially not when I'm running a non-standard wallet build, myself.)
March 03, 2015, 06:01:19 AM
Why answer to FUD spread by Argon Why not simply ignore him as we did with other trolls ?
Answering their hate brings nothing.
Why not simply ignore him as we did with other trolls ?Answering their hate brings nothing.
its not easy become troll state here
we try hard no to do
argon is still on trial even if in my opinion he is close to achieve it (in a negative way)
it hard to see if someone just have a talent for missunderstanding how things linked together
or he just want to create his alternative reality and spread it as facts
if u dont give him a few postings
final decision is made by thread moderator
March 03, 2015, 04:26:18 AM
what are the updates to 2.0.4.1?
this daniel can answer
i forward to him
its long ago i really cant remember
it was basical created just a day (or a few) after 2.0.4.0 and the change
was not relevant for wallet ruleset so it was combatible and not mandatory and we decided to not release it
so close after 2.0.4.0 because that days we had to release a few wallets close after each other
and we didnt want to bother people again with another wallet
March 03, 2015, 04:07:59 AM
Check you own block explorer https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/#!network
You have 3 different sub versions running at once , they are not all the same code (each is different yet they work on the same network.)
And you have the newest subversion /Diamond:2.0.4.1/
IP 193.68.21.19 in Varna , Bulgaria
You have 3 different sub versions running at once , they are not all the same code (each is different yet they work on the same network.)
And you have the newest subversion /Diamond:2.0.4.1/
IP 193.68.21.19 in Varna , Bulgaria
This actually brings up an interesting point, though not the one that Argon was making: why is an officially suggested node (193.68.21.19, the first "connect=" suggestion for the solo mining config file) running a wallet version (2.0.4.1) that's more up-to-date than the source on GitHub (2.0.4.0)? I don't know much about coins server-side, but running bleeding-edge software on stuff that users interact with is usually a bad idea unless its stable. But if it's stable, why is it not on GitHub?
Just curious. Also, what are the updates to 2.0.4.1?
March 03, 2015, 03:56:22 AM
Why does all of the coins have to be in 1 wallet instead of 10 separate ones.
Please show the math , it is harder for you to lie.
Please show the math , it is harder for you to lie.
its easyer to handle it
if value of reactor content raise we might split over multiple wallets
this was stated already by me in this thread already
u asking over and over for "unanswered" stuff but the answer was already given
why u dont cut ur car in 2 parts and 10 parts and store it at different places
this way u can protect the 10000$ value of it better from beeing attacked or stolen
i guess because it is more comfortable to use it in one place
and once u drive a more expensive car u can think about a better protected garage to park it at the evening?
Jump to: