Author

Topic: [ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65% - page 578. (Read 1260677 times)

hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 520
I'm just throwing this out there but has anyone looked at the saffron coin wallet. Just amazing IMHO.
Fully fledged Internal block explorer.*
Fully fledged twitter feed.
Fully fledged IRC
Fully fledged internal  exchanges (bittrex and Cryptsy)*
Displays market cap and fiat price of coin. *
Anonoymous send by just an Alias 2ways. Wallet to wallet.*
A wallet that allows you to buy coins directly with fiat.
First coin to make use of webkit technology for qt wallets to display fully fledged web content.*
Just some amazing features.
If we had half of those features I think it would make these diamonds shine brighter.
Just a suggestion. No sense reinventing the wheel. Wink
Multi tasking wallet. Smiley i can see it now.
With all this wallet talk going on. I'm not suggesting all the features but its a pretty nice lookin wallet.
My picks* (maybe its not doable or wanted)
i'm not trying to promo Saffron.
Take a boo if your inclined.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-sfr-saffroncoin-latest-version-142262-mandatory-wallet-update-586320

legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
even easier for the people would be selling the hardware with preinstalled software, or selling a bootable sdcard to be put into the device.
also a web interface would be killer.

thats the plan
but this should be community project

but basical everything that is done for dmd diamond is done by  community

the dmd foundation is nothing else than a organisation of community people
who deep envolve themself and commit a lot dedication for dmd diamond related projects

but there is no rule that say dmd related projects are only done by foundation members
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
even easier for the people would be selling the hardware with preinstalled software, or selling a bootable sdcard to be put into the device.
also a web interface would be killer.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
i hope we soon can provide the community with a raspery pi 2 hardware wallet solution
that would be around 50$ and be a 5watt 24/7 hardware wallet solution which u can easy administarte via VNC or RDP from ur main PC

pallas' ARM building suggestion works for building the wallet on an RPi2, so the work is already done... it's just not in the official repo for some reason: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8380165. The diff to the official repo is pretty much the same one in my Github fork, if you want a side-by-side comparison, but pallas' solution is more thorough.

i see the goal as a zero linux knowledge solution

what we have now is a compiled wallet that can be run on arm based linux
thats nice but still require "nerds" to get is running (less nerd than required to compile by urself but still)

what i want to achieve is a hardware wallet with preinstalled OS and preinstalled wallet
a easy to follow guilde to move ur wallet.dat into it

very good out of the box security concept

and ideal would be based on ubuntu snappy so that the dmd wallet can be a snapp (the apps avaiable at ubunto snappy appstore) that can be very easy updated by easy automated comparision of binaries and update of them (all non securiry relevant data no wallet.dat no peers.dat no diamond.conf)

we need to get this stuff out to non nerds

people where the highest of nerd skills is to be able plug in a power and a network cable
and start a VNC or remotedesktop connection to the hardware and there follow a easy howto that is placed on the desktop

diamondOS that we have already was a step in this direction a wallet on a stick

but still it block a whole PC and it isnt power efficent

a 5w power efficent small device that dont block ur PC is way better solution and can run 24/7

sr. member
Activity: 527
Merit: 251
Quality Crypto Collector
i tested few month ago,i got thousands of small pieces,staking for 2 months,it was very unlucky to find a minted block,and not got theoretical POS rewards.
then i gathered over 10K dmd for one piece,the POS worked fine.
so,if you wanna get a minted block easily,you'd better get more coins in one piece.
this is unfair for small amount,but the reactor  is very helpful for these small amount holders.


You should make sure your change address is also your main "minting" address as well.

we will reduce pos block time in one of upcoming wallet releases
so small coin pile get easyer included into a group stake

it work now too but it can require to have wallet in minting state for long time to get lucky



This will be true if the owners are constantly running wallets will have more income than those users who sometimes starting its wallets.

thats already happening its like 1-2% more a month if u have wallet always open compared to only open it once a month

if possible i suggest everyone to have hiw wallet minting 24/7

it not only increase his POS earnings a bit

it make sure even his small coin piles get minted

and it give our network a lot stability because if lot wallets

u know what is true is decided by majority of wallets

lot wallets online means lot more security of the truth

i hope we soon can provide the community with a raspery pi 2 hardware wallet solution

that would be around 50$ and be a 5watt 24/7 hardware wallet solution which u can easy administarte via VNC or RDP from ur main PC



That would be a truly fantastic development, Cryptonit!  I, for one, would acquire one immediately and would definitely be staking 24/7.   Cheesy

full member
Activity: 206
Merit: 100
i hope we soon can provide the community with a raspery pi 2 hardware wallet solution
that would be around 50$ and be a 5watt 24/7 hardware wallet solution which u can easy administarte via VNC or RDP from ur main PC

pallas' ARM building suggestion works for building the wallet on an RPi2, so the work is already done... it's just not in the official repo for some reason: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8380165. The diff to the official repo is pretty much the same one in my Github fork, if you want a side-by-side comparison, but pallas' solution is more thorough.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
i tested few month ago,i got thousands of small pieces,staking for 2 months,it was very unlucky to find a minted block,and not got theoretical POS rewards.
then i gathered over 10K dmd for one piece,the POS worked fine.
so,if you wanna get a minted block easily,you'd better get more coins in one piece.
this is unfair for small amount,but the reactor  is very helpful for these small amount holders.


You should make sure your change address is also your main "minting" address as well.

we will reduce pos block time in one of upcoming wallet releases
so small coin pile get easyer included into a group stake

it work now too but it can require to have wallet in minting state for long time to get lucky



This will be true if the owners are constantly running wallets will have more income than those users who sometimes starting its wallets.

thats already happening its like 1-2% more a month if u have wallet always open compared to only open it once a month

if possible i suggest everyone to have hiw wallet minting 24/7

it not only increase his POS earnings a bit

it make sure even his small coin piles get minted

and it give our network a lot stability because if lot wallets

u know what is true is decided by majority of wallets

lot wallets online means lot more security of the truth

i hope we soon can provide the community with a raspery pi 2 hardware wallet solution

that would be around 50$ and be a 5watt 24/7 hardware wallet solution which u can easy administarte via VNC or RDP from ur main PC

legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1013
DMD info: https://diamond-info.github.io/
i tested few month ago,i got thousands of small pieces,staking for 2 months,it was very unlucky to find a minted block,and not got theoretical POS rewards.
then i gathered over 10K dmd for one piece,the POS worked fine.
so,if you wanna get a minted block easily,you'd better get more coins in one piece.
this is unfair for small amount,but the reactor  is very helpful for these small amount holders.


You should make sure your change address is also your main "minting" address as well.

we will reduce pos block time in one of upcoming wallet releases
so small coin pile get easyer included into a group stake

it work now too but it can require to have wallet in minting state for long time to get lucky



This will be true if the owners are constantly running wallets will have more income than those users who sometimes starting its wallets.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
i tested few month ago,i got thousands of small pieces,staking for 2 months,it was very unlucky to find a minted block,and not got theoretical POS rewards.
then i gathered over 10K dmd for one piece,the POS worked fine.
so,if you wanna get a minted block easily,you'd better get more coins in one piece.
this is unfair for small amount,but the reactor  is very helpful for these small amount holders.


You should make sure your change address is also your main "minting" address as well.

we will reduce pos block time in one of upcoming wallet releases
so small coin pile get easyer included into a group stake

it work now too but it can require to have wallet in minting state for long time to get lucky

sr. member
Activity: 302
Merit: 250
Never before 11 P.M.
i tested few month ago,i got thousands of small pieces,staking for 2 months,it was very unlucky to find a minted block,and not got theoretical POS rewards.
then i gathered over 10K dmd for one piece,the POS worked fine.
so,if you wanna get a minted block easily,you'd better get more coins in one piece.
this is unfair for small amount,but the reactor  is very helpful for these small amount holders.


You should make sure your change address is also your main "minting" address as well.
sr. member
Activity: 393
Merit: 250
Just curious.  About a week or two ago I mentioned if anyone looked into adding masternodes or instant x to DMD?  What is everyone's thoughts on that?  I think a masternode might be a great way to decentralize the coin more and also create lot's of demand on the coin.  The coin will be even more rare.  It doesn't have to take a lot of DMD to run a mn.  Say 250 to activate one.  But this will allow us to help decentralize the network.  We could do either a wallet based MN like Spreadcoins or a vpn based mn like Darkcoins?  Any thoughts as to why or why not this would or wouldn't work?  Do we have the programmers able to implement this?  Just food for thought.

Seems like a really great idea if implemented the right way. I strongly disagree with what Charlie Lee said for Litecoin, that LTC does not need new fancy gimmicks. Look at where LTC is now.

Each and every project, including DMD, need constant improvement and innovations which make it stand out from other similar projects. I feel DMD has already got a bunch of nice traits but that does not mean we cannot introduce more and make it even more attractive.

Introducing nodes would at one side generate additional demand for the coin to set up a node, thus making it even more rare and consequently pushing the price up. On the other hand, it would bring profit to the node owner. I would only raise the limit for the node, maybe to at least 500 coins per node. That s under $100 and I think it would be acceptable for everyone.

Agreed.  I just threw out an arbitrary number.  The reason I bring it up is that anyone with longevity mindset can open a masternode and invest long term in addition to the POS staking wallet.  If someone wants to rent a VPN they are going to be more committed to the success of the coin.  It will give a short term and long term investor multiple ways into DMD.  And I believe we would be the first POW, POS, MN wallet?  Correct me if I am wrong.  Liquidity would come in daily POS and MN payments.  I am also sure that with the cloudmining buy pressure the value of DMD would go nuts.

Having POW, POS and MN wallet at the same time would definitely bring attention of the press. I would put that among top DMD priorities. Let us know what community can do to help.

Hehe I think we need a good programmer to implement it!  LOL - I just come up with the ideas.

one could look at the work the spreadcoin dev has done and also the darkcoin dev:
https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=spreadcoin

Not sure if Danbi can implement?

Everything can be implemented, especially things that have been tested already by others (which makes the risks less).

However, as cryptonit mentioned, our current priority is currently elsewhere. As part of it, we need to make the current wallet more stable and secure -- which is mandatory if we are to build on top of it. We can add more features later, when known deficiencies are fixed (there are few already in my list .. and they are not very trivial to fix).

But, if anyone from the community can work to add this to Diamond in mean time, you are more than welcome Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 393
Merit: 250
@Danbi
@popshot
I see the problem with huge amount of miniscule transactions in wallet, I really feel this problem on admin fee wallet, same as you do on foundation wallet.  Hope Danbi is finding a way to fix this problem.  I have made several suggestions to davembg about how we can handle this at pool end by moving admin/donation fees to payouts code with a threshold to minimize transaction rather than in rewardrecipents on NOMP.  This IS a BIG problem at pool end, consolidating a large amount of tiny transactions the transaction fee is just too much!  Add to that there is no way these tiny amounts can stake ...  Hope Danbi has a solution in the works Smiley  This transaction fee problem for pool fees/foundation fees will only become worse when reward reduction to 1/10 as reward will be less than transaction fee Sad  Solution: zero transaction fee, who does this serve anyway?  I don't see any difference in transaction time whether I pay an extra fee anyway ROFL.
We have had changeaddress= in config from beginning so no prob there at least Smiley

There are two questions here, as far as I understand.

1. The large number of transactions in the wallet. This of course bloats the wallet. The changeaddress= code reduces only part of the bloat, that deals with auto creating new addresses. However, the other bloat is not yet resolved. danbi's pool has suffered from this few times already, due to the very high transaction load it has. I am contemplating few possible fixes, but nothing definitive yet.

2. The transaction fee. We could in theory decide to remove the transaction fee, which so far is "useless" - except it goes to the miners, thus encouraging them to mine. This incentive will increase much more when the mining reward is reduced. This is not a coding issue. Smiley

There is at least one more bug, that relates to wallet bloat, which I had not resolved yet as well -- it manifests itself in the inability of the wallet to send it's transactions to others, effectively requiring an manual repair --- I have observed it few times at danbi's pool, but it might be also related to specific wallet corruption. I am still investigating this -- sa it is potentially more serious for our future plans.

You are however not correct that the tiny amounts can't stake. Not only they can stake, but once staking happens, these tiny amounts will take with them other small amounts to form later piles. I am now sorry I did not pay more attention to crypton's ideas of making them stake faster. Mea Culpa. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
pokeytex what we have to do to achive dmd v3
go far beyond the difficulty to add masternodes or a similar system

we add it to our wishlist in fact we had always a plan to add something beside POS that rewards active wallets

please give us some time we have big projects to work on
bigger than anything that was ever done for DMD Diamond


Absolutely and I understand.  I just wanted to discuss it with the community to see if it was viable or made sense.  No pressure.  Keep up the good work.
hero member
Activity: 774
Merit: 554
CEO Diamond Foundation


Thank you Community for all the contributions so far.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
pokeytex what we have to do to achive dmd v3
go far beyond the difficulty to add masternodes or a similar system

we add it to our wishlist in fact we had always a plan to add something beside POS that rewards active wallets

please give us some time we have big projects to work on
bigger than anything that was ever done for DMD Diamond
legendary
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
Just curious.  About a week or two ago I mentioned if anyone looked into adding masternodes or instant x to DMD?  What is everyone's thoughts on that?  I think a masternode might be a great way to decentralize the coin more and also create lot's of demand on the coin.  The coin will be even more rare.  It doesn't have to take a lot of DMD to run a mn.  Say 250 to activate one.  But this will allow us to help decentralize the network.  We could do either a wallet based MN like Spreadcoins or a vpn based mn like Darkcoins?  Any thoughts as to why or why not this would or wouldn't work?  Do we have the programmers able to implement this?  Just food for thought.

Seems like a really great idea if implemented the right way. I strongly disagree with what Charlie Lee said for Litecoin, that LTC does not need new fancy gimmicks. Look at where LTC is now.

Each and every project, including DMD, need constant improvement and innovations which make it stand out from other similar projects. I feel DMD has already got a bunch of nice traits but that does not mean we cannot introduce more and make it even more attractive.

Introducing nodes would at one side generate additional demand for the coin to set up a node, thus making it even more rare and consequently pushing the price up. On the other hand, it would bring profit to the node owner. I would only raise the limit for the node, maybe to at least 500 coins per node. That s under $100 and I think it would be acceptable for everyone.

Agreed.  I just threw out an arbitrary number.  The reason I bring it up is that anyone with longevity mindset can open a masternode and invest long term in addition to the POS staking wallet.  If someone wants to rent a VPN they are going to be more committed to the success of the coin.  It will give a short term and long term investor multiple ways into DMD.  And I believe we would be the first POW, POS, MN wallet?  Correct me if I am wrong.  Liquidity would come in daily POS and MN payments.  I am also sure that with the cloudmining buy pressure the value of DMD would go nuts.

Having POW, POS and MN wallet at the same time would definitely bring attention of the press. I would put that among top DMD priorities. Let us know what community can do to help.

Hehe I think we need a good programmer to implement it!  LOL - I just come up with the ideas.

one could look at the work the spreadcoin dev has done and also the darkcoin dev:
https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=spreadcoin

Not sure if Danbi can implement?
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
DMD Diamond Making Money 4+ years! Join us!
Just curious.  About a week or two ago I mentioned if anyone looked into adding masternodes or instant x to DMD?  What is everyone's thoughts on that?  I think a masternode might be a great way to decentralize the coin more and also create lot's of demand on the coin.  The coin will be even more rare.  It doesn't have to take a lot of DMD to run a mn.  Say 250 to activate one.  But this will allow us to help decentralize the network.  We could do either a wallet based MN like Spreadcoins or a vpn based mn like Darkcoins?  Any thoughts as to why or why not this would or wouldn't work?  Do we have the programmers able to implement this?  Just food for thought.

Seems like a really great idea if implemented the right way. I strongly disagree with what Charlie Lee said for Litecoin, that LTC does not need new fancy gimmicks. Look at where LTC is now.

Each and every project, including DMD, need constant improvement and innovations which make it stand out from other similar projects. I feel DMD has already got a bunch of nice traits but that does not mean we cannot introduce more and make it even more attractive.

Introducing nodes would at one side generate additional demand for the coin to set up a node, thus making it even more rare and consequently pushing the price up. On the other hand, it would bring profit to the node owner. I would only raise the limit for the node, maybe to at least 500 coins per node. That s under $100 and I think it would be acceptable for everyone.

Agreed.  I just threw out an arbitrary number.  The reason I bring it up is that anyone with longevity mindset can open a masternode and invest long term in addition to the POS staking wallet.  If someone wants to rent a VPN they are going to be more committed to the success of the coin.  It will give a short term and long term investor multiple ways into DMD.  And I believe we would be the first POW, POS, MN wallet?  Correct me if I am wrong.  Liquidity would come in daily POS and MN payments.  I am also sure that with the cloudmining buy pressure the value of DMD would go nuts.

Having POW, POS and MN wallet at the same time would definitely bring attention of the press. I would put that among top DMD priorities. Let us know what community can do to help.
legendary
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
Just curious.  About a week or two ago I mentioned if anyone looked into adding masternodes or instant x to DMD?  What is everyone's thoughts on that?  I think a masternode might be a great way to decentralize the coin more and also create lot's of demand on the coin.  The coin will be even more rare.  It doesn't have to take a lot of DMD to run a mn.  Say 250 to activate one.  But this will allow us to help decentralize the network.  We could do either a wallet based MN like Spreadcoins or a vpn based mn like Darkcoins?  Any thoughts as to why or why not this would or wouldn't work?  Do we have the programmers able to implement this?  Just food for thought.

Seems like a really great idea if implemented the right way. I strongly disagree with what Charlie Lee said for Litecoin, that LTC does not need new fancy gimmicks. Look at where LTC is now.

Each and every project, including DMD, need constant improvement and innovations which make it stand out from other similar projects. I feel DMD has already got a bunch of nice traits but that does not mean we cannot introduce more and make it even more attractive.

Introducing nodes would at one side generate additional demand for the coin to set up a node, thus making it even more rare and consequently pushing the price up. On the other hand, it would bring profit to the node owner. I would only raise the limit for the node, maybe to at least 500 coins per node. That s under $100 and I think it would be acceptable for everyone.

Agreed.  I just threw out an arbitrary number.  The reason I bring it up is that anyone with longevity mindset can open a masternode and invest long term in addition to the POS staking wallet.  If someone wants to rent a VPN they are going to be more committed to the success of the coin.  It will give a short term and long term investor multiple ways into DMD.  And I believe we would be the first POW, POS, MN wallet?  Correct me if I am wrong.  Liquidity would come in daily POS and MN payments.  I am also sure that with the cloudmining buy pressure the value of DMD would go nuts.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
DMD Diamond Making Money 4+ years! Join us!
Just curious.  About a week or two ago I mentioned if anyone looked into adding masternodes or instant x to DMD?  What is everyone's thoughts on that?  I think a masternode might be a great way to decentralize the coin more and also create lot's of demand on the coin.  The coin will be even more rare.  It doesn't have to take a lot of DMD to run a mn.  Say 250 to activate one.  But this will allow us to help decentralize the network.  We could do either a wallet based MN like Spreadcoins or a vpn based mn like Darkcoins?  Any thoughts as to why or why not this would or wouldn't work?  Do we have the programmers able to implement this?  Just food for thought.

Seems like a really great idea if implemented the right way. I strongly disagree with what Charlie Lee said for Litecoin, that LTC does not need new fancy gimmicks. Look at where LTC is now.

Each and every project, including DMD, need constant improvement and innovations which make it stand out from other similar projects. I feel DMD has already got a bunch of nice traits but that does not mean we cannot introduce more and make it even more attractive.

Introducing nodes would at one side generate additional demand for the coin to set up a node, thus making it even more rare and consequently pushing the price up. On the other hand, it would bring profit to the node owner. I would only raise the limit for the node, maybe to at least 500 coins per node. That s under $100 and I think it would be acceptable for everyone.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
I already compiled the arm binary. You can find it, along with building instructions, if you search this thread.

Found the ARM building instructions - they really do look similar to what I did, so I'm glad I didn't take a path that was totally ludicrous.

For people that might be looking at this down the line, pallas' Diamond wallet ARM build instructions and headless binary are linked in his post here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8380165 ! It even has a nifty donation address for his work.

Is there any chance you know the reason your additions (and the boost scopes that I missed, though it looks like the file just uses the namespace, so maybe they're no longer necessary?) haven't been picked up in the official repo? It didn't look like danbi was being too responsive on the matter and I got tired of flipping through the thread to look for the conversation really quickly (and just looked through your past posts to find your instructions/build).

Also, do you have a Git/SVN/Mercurial/whatever repo that you maintain for your builds? If you do, I'm going to delete my fork and follow yours, even if it's not linked to the DMDcoin GitHub.

And, finally, sorry for stepping on your toes if you were affronted.

EDIT: clarification of boost scope/namespace usage

No problem! :-)
I do not plan to keep the arm build updated as I'm not using it any longer and there is no interest in it.
I don't know why danbi didn't want to apply my modifications to the main tree, maybe he didn't want to risk modifying a stable source for very few users...
Jump to: