after long tests and usage my opinion about dstm for GTX1080ti is here - it is the same as ewbf
why? here is why :
hashrate for one gtx 1080ti aprox 770sol, so 4 x 760 = 3040 sol/s
while with same settings it is 2960 sol on ewbf.
so you it is 2.7% win for dstm. but, there is a dev fee 2% and ewbf we can use without devfee - that means that actual difference is less then 1%
and taking into account, that ewbf is more stable for my rig, the choice is obvious
however! for 2 x gtx1070 on dstm i'm getting 960 sol/s and 920 sol/s with ewbf
so it is 4.3% difference, minus 2% dev fee and we comes to 2.3% benefit.
I can accept that bonus for gtx1070
I second that, I see exactly the same production difference.
Only my numbers are different because you are pushing the cards hard in power limit, and I am aiming at top efficiency, but regardless the result is the same, my numbers says 2.2 % difference bettween EWBF and DSTM miner, so taking into the account the 2% fee the production is the same.
at least on the 1080Ti's i am testing on the 1080s (non-Tis) I'll post back tomorrow with results, but it seems that production is the same, i'm also don't notice much CPU usage right now, it looks lower than previous versions.
BTW: zm miner tends to spike power usage (it's not constant, it goes up and down) the average endup being the same as EWBF but EWBF miner uses constant power, no spikes of any kind (i have an AC current meter bar graph (vu-meter like) to measure this behavior)
so in the end no much difference, but as someone said here dstm is active developing it, so I'm more inclined towards using ZM miner for the time being.
cheers
Indkt.
